IU-Murray would actually be a nice play-in game.Originally posted by The_Answer1313:
IU shouldnt be in either but they are much better than Murray St.
You clearly didn't watch the game...Originally posted by Seth C:
Sucks for them but they had their chance and they blew it, hard. On the other hand, if Indiana deserves to get in then maybe we should seriously consider lowering the number of teams that make the tournament.
Make. It. Happen.Originally posted by Smashcat:
IU-Murray would actually be a nice play-in game.Originally posted by The_Answer1313:
IU shouldnt be in either but they are much better than Murray St.
I understand that viewpoint, but I also understand the reason this is a topic on this board.Originally posted by CATSrock:
ymmot31 - the OVC has had quite a few upsets over the years and has been very respectable. Murray and Morehead most recently pulled early upsets. I still would rather see Murray get the nod over a 5/6/7 place finisher in a big conference. i.e. Indiana or TxAM
Because it's a Kentucky School and we generally root for our brethren... except for UL.Originally posted by ymmot31:
I understand that viewpoint, but I also understand the reason this is a topic on this board.Originally posted by CATSrock:
ymmot31 - the OVC has had quite a few upsets over the years and has been very respectable. Murray and Morehead most recently pulled early upsets. I still would rather see Murray get the nod over a 5/6/7 place finisher in a big conference. i.e. Indiana or TxAM
I watched the game. Despite Belmont's best efforts, at the end of the game Murray had their ticket punched and completely BLEW IT. No further rationale needed. This was their playoff game. They failed the test. They aren't dancing.Originally posted by UKCatsFan10:
You clearly didn't watch the game...Originally posted by Seth C:
Sucks for them but they had their chance and they blew it, hard. On the other hand, if Indiana deserves to get in then maybe we should seriously consider lowering the number of teams that make the tournament.
Anyone that did knows Murray didn't blow anything. Belmont hit 15 threes, they played great. Belmont WON that game, don't take that away from them by saying Murray blew it. If you want to say that late turnover cost Murray their bid then fine, I'll agree with that. But that would mean that you actually watched the game and therefore saw that Belmont won it far more than Murray blew it. I'm a huge Murray fan, live near the campus and while I attended UK for college, most of my friends went to MSU. I hated to see the Racers get eliminated, but you have to credit Belmont for the way they played... Both teams would have waxed the floor with Indiana on that given night.
I totally agree with you on this.Originally posted by KentuckyRLD:
Indiana is going to lose again. If they are in and Murray is out there should be a revolt.
Originally posted by Lra1:
I feel bad for them as well: They did beat Eastern KY by +8 who beat Miami by +26 who beat Duke by +6 which makes Murray State 40 points better than Duke a one seed. They also beat Illinois State +12 who beat Wichita State +3 which makes Murray State 15 points better than Wichita State another tournament team. They also beat Belmont +6 another tournament team.
All 4 regular season losses came within the first 6 games of the season.
And anyone who goes on a 25 game winning streak plus undefeated in conference and gets beat by a team shooting shots out of their tail, did you see the threes they were making from half court banks and flying to the left and throw it up and it goes in, some of Murrays victims in NCAA have been Vanderbilt, NC State(Valvano) Alabama scared the pants off of Butler when they went to final game and came within a layup against Danny Manning and Kansas took numbey 1 rated Michigan State to wire, also had UNC down 10 at half and played Duke within a whisker, don't tell me they don't deserve to be in.Originally posted by UK till Death:
A sub 200 SoS with no signature wins isn't entitled to anything.
Bull, Muray St. would beat Indiana.....Originally posted by The_Answer1313:
IU shouldnt be in either but they are much better than Murray St.
Waitaminute! I forgot that Wisconsin lost by 10 to Duke, so that means... !!!Originally posted by dezyDeco:
Originally posted by Lra1:
I feel bad for them as well: They did beat Eastern KY by +8 who beat Miami by +26 who beat Duke by +6 which makes Murray State 40 points better than Duke a one seed. They also beat Illinois State +12 who beat Wichita State +3 which makes Murray State 15 points better than Wichita State another tournament team. They also beat Belmont +6 another tournament team.
All 4 regular season losses came within the first 6 games of the season.
Yeah, 40 better than Duke... and 15 better than the Shockers...
Man, I sure hope we get somebody like Wisconsin in our bracket, instead of Murray State!![]()
Agree with everything you said except for MSU "blowing it, hard." If blowing it was that one of their ten turnovers, then sure. They blew it. Williams should have held onto the ball and went to the FT line. He's a 65% shooter so maybe he hits both and the game is basically over, or maybe he makes 1 of 2, Belmont forces OT, then who knows... However, to insinuate Belmont was undeserving of that win is not accurate IMO. They made contested shots all night long and I think they deserve some credit for that. Granted, one of their biggest threes was a prayer that banked in, but they put themselves in a spot to win and then executed perfectly.Originally posted by Seth C:
I watched the game. Despite Belmont's best efforts, at the end of the game Murray had their ticket punched and completely BLEW IT. No further rationale needed. This was their playoff game. They failed the test. They aren't dancing.Originally posted by UKCatsFan10:
You clearly didn't watch the game...Originally posted by Seth C:
Sucks for them but they had their chance and they blew it, hard. On the other hand, if Indiana deserves to get in then maybe we should seriously consider lowering the number of teams that make the tournament.
Anyone that did knows Murray didn't blow anything. Belmont hit 15 threes, they played great. Belmont WON that game, don't take that away from them by saying Murray blew it. If you want to say that late turnover cost Murray their bid then fine, I'll agree with that. But that would mean that you actually watched the game and therefore saw that Belmont won it far more than Murray blew it. I'm a huge Murray fan, live near the campus and while I attended UK for college, most of my friends went to MSU. I hated to see the Racers get eliminated, but you have to credit Belmont for the way they played... Both teams would have waxed the floor with Indiana on that given night.
I agree........Murray St should be in.Originally posted by CATSrock:
Not so sure IU is better at all. Murray has excellent guards and unlike the Hoosiers they are well coached.
Originally posted by crawfords corner:
Lost to a team who finished the regular season at 12-18. Another loss came against a Portland team who finished the regular season at 17-14. The same Portland team that lost to 8-23 LMU and 12-19 Pacific. Two best opponents they played in non conference beat them by an average margin of 31 points(Xavier-27, Valpo-35). Best win was against Illinois State who finished 3rd in the 12th best conference. They had 2 chances to get that signature win for themselves and got blown out both times.
I feel bad for them, but there are other teams with better resumes.