Lots of folks on obamacare exchange plans getting 25% hikes. Seems to be working
Mine is going up around 10. I have no idea how much the company is eating.We're going to modify our plan to keep the hike to 10%, but it still sucks. No change in census, other than 1 more year of age, and it's the second year in a row we've had high double digit increases.
Is your plan private? Through a large group plan? Union? Has your deductible gone up? Notice I didn't say down.:flush:Our plan is going up 9.5%. Just like it has for a decade.
Then, you agree that Obamacare is a failure? The original sell was that it would insure more at a lower cost. You say the % increase is constant. The uncovered remains at 41 million without coverage. Coverage for a lot of insured is less than what they had before, and out-of-pocket cost is greater now than before. And total cost of Obamacare is to grow in the out years. Clearly a failure.Our plan is going up 9.5%. Just like it has for a decade.
Not a total failure, but not a homerun by any stretch. We could probably have something far better than present if the Republicans would work on improving the law instead of wasting time trying to void it. The law was never intended to reduce insurance costs in the near term, but we should be slowing down the rate of increase. I wish the R's would stop whining, raise the penalties and give the enforcement some teeth.Then, you agree that Obamacare is a failure? The original sell was that it would insure more at a lower cost. You say the % increase is constant. The uncovered remains at 41 million without coverage. Coverage for a lot of insured is less than what they had before, and out-of-pocket cost is greater now than before. And total cost of Obamacare is to grow in the out years. Clearly a failure.
It's not a penalty. It's a tax.Not a total failure, but not a homerun by any stretch. We could probably have something far better than present if the Republicans would work on improving the law instead of wasting time trying to void it. The law was never intended to reduce insurance costs in the near term, but we should be slowing down the rate of increase. I wish the R's would stop whining, raise the penalties and give the enforcement some teeth.
Not a total failure, but not a homerun by any stretch. We could probably have something far better than present if the Republicans would work on improving the law instead of wasting time trying to void it. The law was never intended to reduce insurance costs in the near term, but we should be slowing down the rate of increase. I wish the R's would stop whining, raise the penalties and give the enforcement some teeth.
The whole law was a lie and if the Dems had wanted to work with the r's , then there would have been something better. The dems passed it by resolution not by vote. Hopefully, the tables will be turned after next election and the law can be repealed by resolution.Not a total failure, but not a homerun by any stretch. We could probably have something far better than present if the Republicans would work on improving the law instead of wasting time trying to void it. The law was never intended to reduce insurance costs in the near term, but we should be slowing down the rate of increase. I wish the R's would stop whining, raise the penalties and give the enforcement some teeth.
Coop, are you taking a few liberties with the history of Obamacare? The original sell was the cost of medical care to be reduced and everyone was to actually be covered. "Never intended to reduce insurance costs in the near term" may be an accurate statement if you are copying "depends on what is is" Clintonian parsing . Pray tell, why would the Rs want to associate their name and reputation with the abortion created solely by Ds? Are you suggesting Rs should adopt something they fought since inception to bail out their opposition?Not a total failure, but not a homerun by any stretch. We could probably have something far better than present if the Republicans would work on improving the law instead of wasting time trying to void it. The law was never intended to reduce insurance costs in the near term, but we should be slowing down the rate of increase. I wish the R's would stop whining, raise the penalties and give the enforcement some teeth.
The GOP absolutely shares the blame for this. Not only for their ridiculous attempts to hurt Obama instead of fixing the problems, but for the years of doing nothing that precluded the law. My head is far too large to fit up my *** and I am nowhere near flexible to begin with.It's not a penalty. It's a tax.
Did you seriously just try to blame the goddamn GOP? Seriously? The whole reason they didn't want it passed to begin with was because of all the drawbacks we are seeing now. The DNC rammed this unwanted **** down our throats. We had to pass to even see what was in it. It's been a colossal goat **** from start to present, and you have the audacity to say it's the GOPs fault for not cleaning up the mess the DNC made? How far would you say your head is up your ***? Just to the ears or are you neck deep?
Sure would be nice to get more people paying in to that system. And death panels.They thought health insurance can be treated like any other free market, but it's not. So we won't even see rates drop in the long term. Much less actual care costs.
Mark it down. As ICD-10 is more widely implemented, and as more boomers hit their 70's and 80's, costs are going to skyrocket.
Very interesting concept that you "can't believe... conservatives... OK with f'n freeloaders. Your solution is for someone else pay taxes/fees to relieve the obligation of f'n freeloaders?The GOP absolutely shares the blame for this. Not only for their ridiculous attempts to hurt Obama instead of fixing the problems, but for the years of doing nothing that precluded the law. My head is far too large to fit up my *** and I am nowhere near flexible to begin with.
BTW - tax/penalty whatever you want to call it needs strengthened as does the enforcability (sp/even a word?). I can't believe all you "conservatives" are ok with all the f'n freeloaders in this country.
Well the distinction is pretty important for the ruling of SCOTUS to hold merit first of all.The GOP absolutely shares the blame for this. Not only for their ridiculous attempts to hurt Obama instead of fixing the problems, but for the years of doing nothing that precluded the law. My head is far too large to fit up my *** and I am nowhere near flexible to begin with.
BTW - tax/penalty whatever you want to call it needs strengthened as does the enforcability (sp/even a word?). I can't believe all you "conservatives" are ok with all the f'n freeloaders in this country.