Let's play the comparison game.
Here's Buie's conference stats for the year ...
27.2 mpg
10.3 ppg
38% 2pt% (87 attempts)
36% 3pt% (91 attempts)
81% FT%
3.6 Assists/G
2.1 TO/G
46% eFG%
22.3 pts/100
37% FG%/100
.039 WS/40
.1 Defensive Win Shares
112.9 Defensive Rating
19 games
Here's another point guard ...
36.4 mpg
11.7 ppg
40% 2pt% (146 attempts)
28% 3pt% (76 attempts)
77% FT%
6.6 Assists/G
2.4 TO/G
41% eFG%
20.2 pts/100
36% FG%/100
.073 WS/40
.6 Defensive Win Shares
108.1 Defensive Rating
18 games
Let's guess who the second player is. Play the Jeopardy music.
The second player is the conference stats from McIntosh's sophomore year. The same McIntosh so many of you constantly reference. We can agree BMac is a top-five point guard in NU history, right? Maybe top three?
I'm not going to argue that Buie is better than BMac. There's some obvious differences. But there's plenty of similarities also. And conventional wisdom out here was EASILY and strongly positive about BMac after his sophomore season.
But Buie should be the first guy replaced ... painful to watch ... and send him to the bench on a poor team? Those of you who think Buie takes too many shots and is careless with the ball might not want to look at the relevant stats compared to McIntosh's sophomore year.
OK, that's my last speech on this topic. I understand opinions can be swayed by our own experiences. But I really find the strong opinions on Buie puzzling.
Let's hope he can shape up his decisionmaking. I think that's very coachable.
Here's Buie's conference stats for the year ...
27.2 mpg
10.3 ppg
38% 2pt% (87 attempts)
36% 3pt% (91 attempts)
81% FT%
3.6 Assists/G
2.1 TO/G
46% eFG%
22.3 pts/100
37% FG%/100
.039 WS/40
.1 Defensive Win Shares
112.9 Defensive Rating
19 games
Here's another point guard ...
36.4 mpg
11.7 ppg
40% 2pt% (146 attempts)
28% 3pt% (76 attempts)
77% FT%
6.6 Assists/G
2.4 TO/G
41% eFG%
20.2 pts/100
36% FG%/100
.073 WS/40
.6 Defensive Win Shares
108.1 Defensive Rating
18 games
Let's guess who the second player is. Play the Jeopardy music.
The second player is the conference stats from McIntosh's sophomore year. The same McIntosh so many of you constantly reference. We can agree BMac is a top-five point guard in NU history, right? Maybe top three?
I'm not going to argue that Buie is better than BMac. There's some obvious differences. But there's plenty of similarities also. And conventional wisdom out here was EASILY and strongly positive about BMac after his sophomore season.
But Buie should be the first guy replaced ... painful to watch ... and send him to the bench on a poor team? Those of you who think Buie takes too many shots and is careless with the ball might not want to look at the relevant stats compared to McIntosh's sophomore year.
OK, that's my last speech on this topic. I understand opinions can be swayed by our own experiences. But I really find the strong opinions on Buie puzzling.
Let's hope he can shape up his decisionmaking. I think that's very coachable.