N.O.B.
- Thread starter mashburned
- Start date
Is it bad to say that after reviewing the evidence, I'm closing in on both #teamLinchTheSnitch and #TeamFireSpear?
You cannot use your name as your handle and say things like he did regarding women on a public message board. Even if your alias is the worst secret since I don't know what, at least have an out with an alias.
If he had an alias he could have simply said, "that's not me and I don't know wtf you are talking about", and then worked with the mods to get it all deleted.
You cannot use your name as your handle and say things like he did regarding women on a public message board. Even if your alias is the worst secret since I don't know what, at least have an out with an alias.
If he had an alias he could have simply said, "that's not me and I don't know wtf you are talking about", and then worked with the mods to get it all deleted.
Spears is gone. Mav is gone. Our pets heads are fallin off.....
Just what I've gathered. This board has so many b****** so I'm not surprised. I've known Jason through the boards for years. I hate it for him. God help the snitch when he's found.
Well guys I'm about to start a Reddit thread for us. To hell with the system
Him and rachel madow are reaching perry Ellis status. They have been at Wisconsin since 1950
People need to take that "at will" employment clause a little more seriously if they don't have a collective bargaining agreement.
Especially if they are using company resources or time....
Especially if they are using company resources or time....
I'm gonna step in and say some of his posts in the wrestling thread about women wrestlers were off color and could make corporate *** cheeks tighten if they read them. I don't think they were quite fireable, but they wouldn't help his case. I will ask if this is what Wayne is referencing, how he knew that, as he doesn't post in the wrestling thread.
Someone quoted a post from him referencing his "man meat" and smacking that against a woman who claimed she had fibromyalgia.
Yeah, he said it in jest, but damn, if you're the hospital it puts them in a bad spot, especially if you have a guy who puts his hands on your patients. If anyone ever filed a complaint against him, patient or fellow staff, they have evidence on file that would hurt his and their case.
So with that one piece of evidence I read, I'd argue the hospital had justification to fire him. I vaguely remember reading posts from him, and I certainly have nothing against him, but it is a cautionary tale about taking precautions when you post crude messages on an open forum.
And still, the guy who turned him in is the pos in this story. He's the real villain here.
Yeah, he said it in jest, but damn, if you're the hospital it puts them in a bad spot, especially if you have a guy who puts his hands on your patients. If anyone ever filed a complaint against him, patient or fellow staff, they have evidence on file that would hurt his and their case.
So with that one piece of evidence I read, I'd argue the hospital had justification to fire him. I vaguely remember reading posts from him, and I certainly have nothing against him, but it is a cautionary tale about taking precautions when you post crude messages on an open forum.
And still, the guy who turned him in is the pos in this story. He's the real villain here.
Some places have a morality clause that can take into account your online activity. Don't know if this was the case or not.
Yes, indeed.
My workplace monitors net usage. Hence the primary reason for posting only during lunch breaks.
The problem is, Jason should only be able to hang Jason by a noose. Instead, a person asked Jason to delete offensive posts ((and he complied)--and still someone took it upon themselves to take the matter into their own hands. I'd love to think he has grounds for a lawsuit.
I agree, but I doubt that Jason has grounds for a law suit against anybody. aybe he could claim defamation of character by the person that turned in the email, but it was stuff that he wrote so I don't think it would get anywhere.
WIth his employer, much like the rest of us, you can be fired at any time for any reason that isn't illegal (age, race, sex, religion). You can be fired because the boss doesn't like the color of your shirt. Unless you work under a contract that calls for cause. Even then, they can create something. Once your fired, you have no money & income to put up a fight. I'm not advocating unions, but management is gets to play with a stacked deck.
He's gonna be fine and land on his feet. Too smart and good of a guy to do otherwise.
Doesn't mean the offender shouldn't burn in Internet hell.
Doesn't mean the offender shouldn't burn in Internet hell.
Or receive a severe beaten in real life.
No link posted. Send it privately to people we trust. Otherwise the POS can just lurk there too.
I'm not a labor lawyer, but I don't think this is 100% true in practice. I know at my work that HR requires us to build up a big case against someone to get them fired. If we could fire someone because, as you say, "we don't like the color of their shirt", we'd move much faster whenever we had a problem. Instead, we always give multiple chances, put together a ton of evidence, and have to go beyond what I'd consider reasonable effort on our end before we finally pull the trigger. We do this to prevent any issue of that employee coming back after us.
Pleas lawd baby Jesus in big blue heaven, please let us win this game today against these heathen shockers. Amen.
Ps - let us find out who did this to Jason so that we may smite him.
Ps - let us find out who did this to Jason so that we may smite him.
From what I have read, it can depend on the employee handbook. You have to follow your stated procedure. The key is that there are always some things that can be immediately fired, like dishonesty. Just have to trap the employee in a small white lie. I've seen it done. Hopefully what I saw is not the norm.