No crying about IHSA conspiracies this year...
MC140,
Don't you find it a little odd Sterling moved to the North this season? Could have drawn the same line this year and sent them south.
I don't know. Did they exact same teams make it in 5a this year? Hubbard is a team that routinely bounces back and forth between north and south depending on the year in 6a.
Naz fans should be ecstatic, they got a dream draw. Don't know what captain PA is complaining about.
You may be right but JCA has no one to blame but themselves. They could have beat Naz but they didn't, IHSA had no hand in that game. If Naz loses to Sterling or someone else they won't have the IHSA to blame for that. That's a losers mentality,TPF,
Not complaining about the Naz draw at all. Contrary to some people's opinion I'm not just in it for one team. When the system is rigged it's rigged against everyone in an area, was it really fair to JCA to have to play Naz in round two...was it fair to all the fans that came out to the state title game on both sides for it to be a blow out. Point is there is an agenda by some at the IHSA and why I suggested as Edgy did yesterday to go to straight 1-32 seeding in the playoffs and then there is no question how things fell out.
MC140,
If you look at the maps last year and this year they make little sense sending Morris to Marion for a game and Genessro to Troy to keep Sterling in the North and soften the south. This is gerrymandering at its definition. Last year they sent JCA north and Richards south. It's sad. It really is time to go straight 1-32 for 6A and 5 A and it takes away any question of this nonsense.
I think I seen the sprinklers are already on in Woodstock.IMO - No too young and a lot of key players will be in playoffs for first time. I can see them getting to quarters at Woodstock...that's a place that's Naz has been very unlucky. Winnable but definitely a hostile environment where mid-Nov weather could be a Huge Factor. They can make a run with the good draw...but picking them as favorites is tough
You may be right but JCA has no one to blame but themselves. They could have beat Naz but they didn't, IHSA had no hand in that game. If Naz loses to Sterling or someone else they won't have the IHSA to blame for that. That's a losers mentality,
I think I seen the sprinklers are already on in Woodstock.
Wouldn't be wise. We won by 35 in the snow last yearHeard they are getting the snow guns from Crystal Mountain for week 3 of the playoffs.
At the end of the day just play the game, the best team will prevail and losers will be find something to complain about.TPF,
My point has nothing to do about whether or not Naz or JCA or Sterling win. It's about maneuvering the lines as they wish, to shape the outcomes of any or multiple games for political reasons. If you go to straight 1-32 seeding any questions disappear.
Last year they sent JCA north and Richards south.
I'm not familiar with all the names of the posters here....
Are the Naz fans complaining about their bracket because Sterling didn't go south? Sterling is north of I-88.
I'm not familiar with all the names of the posters here....
Are the Naz fans complaining about their bracket because Sterling didn't go south? Sterling is north of I-88.
No I don't have an issue with the Naz draw. I do however have an issue with the way IHSA draws lines when they can simply go to 1-32 like they have in 7 & 8 A. Also my opinion is mine, don't lump the Naz guys in with me as I don't think anyone has pitched a *****.
Perhaps they will never seed and bracket 1-32 because there would be too many awful slaughters, massacres, total mismatches and running clocks in mass quantities and heavy doses in the first 2-3 rounds in all classes?! Imagine eight 1/32, 2/31, 3/30 and etc awful match-ups for a grand total of however many. There are plenty of blowouts now......but they can manage, minimize the quantity, minimize the degree of them, and scatter them throughout the rounds some so it isn't so obvious. Who would go see these awful match-ups and slaughters after doing so once or twice? Lol.
I don't recall any JCA fan complaining last year. Direct your vitriol elsewhere.You may be right but JCA has no one to blame but themselves. They could have beat Naz but they didn't, IHSA had no hand in that game. If Naz loses to Sterling or someone else they won't have the IHSA to blame for that. That's a losers mentality,
Richards is a different class. And if you are going to cry about Sterling, Rich Central is the team who got screwed as they are farther south than JCA.
lolI think I seen the sprinklers are already on in Woodstock.
Wasn't that PR and not MCC?I think I seen the sprinklers are already on in Woodstock.
MCC it was pouring last year. it was a jokeWasn't that PR and not MCC?
It seems that you all complain about 2 things when playing at MCC's field. The home cooking when it comes to the refs, which me being a MCC diehard I obviously don't see! LOL! Then the turf! Yeah its got peet for a base and a good rain with a couple of games on a Friday night it goes from beautiful grass to a quagmire in 4 hours! We can't complain though the land was donated to us back in 1959! I know if the rest of the ESCC would like to help us out the school would probably love a new field turf surface! Then we would all be playing on turf. We just can't afford it at this point.I think I seen the sprinklers are already on in Woodstock.
It seems that you all complain about 2 things when playing at MCC's field. The home cooking when it comes to the refs, which me being a MCC diehard I obviously don't see! LOL! Then the turf! Yeah its got peet for a base and a good rain with a couple of games on a Friday night it goes from beautiful grass to a quagmire in 4 hours! We can't complain though the land was donated to us back in 1959! I know if the rest of the ESCC would like to help us out the school would probably love a new field turf surface! Then we would all be playing on turf. We just can't afford it at this point.
Regardless of the turf...both teams play on the same surface right, let's just hope we get to see the game this year! Good luck to youIt seems that you all complain about 2 things when playing at MCC's field. The home cooking when it comes to the refs, which me being a MCC diehard I obviously don't see! LOL! Then the turf! Yeah its got peet for a base and a good rain with a couple of games on a Friday night it goes from beautiful grass to a quagmire in 4 hours! We can't complain though the land was donated to us back in 1959! I know if the rest of the ESCC would like to help us out the school would probably love a new field turf surface! Then we would all be playing on turf. We just can't afford it at this point.
I like the grass too, the problem is the peet that is under it. It goes deep! To fix it I think you would have to core out a couple of feet and bring clay in to bridge it then top soil and sod. You would also have to redo the sprinkler system! In the end you would be back to a good natural surface with its drawbacks also. So if you were doing all that you might as well put in turf.The quagmire last year was unbelievable, but it was fun to watch and if the kids gave an honest answer they would tell you how much fun playing in the mud is. I wish all fields were grass, It is not feasible for many based on the constant use. Nazareth, based on the reserve dollars put aside each year for replacement of the turf vs. maintenance and sod cost of grass is about break even with turf but gets 2-3x the usage that the old grass field got. IMO if it doesn't limit other activities and you can maintain it, Keep the Grass.
You had your chance to get turf. The administration didn't want to take a donation specifically for turf.It seems that you all complain about 2 things when playing at MCC's field. The home cooking when it comes to the refs, which me being a MCC diehard I obviously don't see! LOL! Then the turf! Yeah its got peet for a base and a good rain with a couple of games on a Friday night it goes from beautiful grass to a quagmire in 4 hours! We can't complain though the land was donated to us back in 1959! I know if the rest of the ESCC would like to help us out the school would probably love a new field turf surface! Then we would all be playing on turf. We just can't afford it at this point.
I hope it happens to! It would be great! I think Naz might have a better chance of getting there. I think MCC would play Hillcrest in the 2nd round. Hillcrest's schedule looked pretty tough this year and their 7&2 record shows that they have to be good. I don't know much about them. I hope someone chimes in on them. I seen Sterling play Friday against DeKalb. Who ever gets to play them will have a tough apponent for sure. Good speed and very well balanced! Also plays a very good, bend but not break defense. In my opinion 5A is wide open with no clear cut favorites!Regardless of the turf...both teams play on the same surface right, let's just hope we get to see the game this year! Good luck to you