Toggle sidebar

Need More Proof.....

bornaneer

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
30,950
1,667
113
that this was never about justice. The leftest nuts in congress and their *** lickers on this board will NEVER allow President Trump to be acquitted in the Senate:

WASHINGTON — The future of the House’s impeachment case against President Trump is in doubt on Thursday, after the third-ranking House Democrat raised the possibility that the chamber would permanently withhold the articles from the Senate.
 
bornaneer

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
30,950
1,667
113
LOL......Wonder what she would call Pencil Neck?

Nancy Pelosi on Thursday defended her decision to hold off on sending impeachment articles to the Senate, calling Mitch McConnell a "rogue leader" in an unusual press conference where she repeatedly tried to shut down questions about the impeachment process.
 
M

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
284
83
bornaneer said:
that this was never about justice. The leftest nuts in congress and their *** lickers on this board will NEVER allow President Trump to be acquitted in the Senate:

WASHINGTON — The future of the House’s impeachment case against President Trump is in doubt on Thursday, after the third-ranking House Democrat raised the possibility that the chamber would permanently withhold the articles from the Senate.
Click to expand...
lol oh cry me a river. It's not a terrible idea. Why send the articles to the Senate for a sham "trial" where he can be "acquitted"? Senate Repubs have already made it clear that they have zero intention of taking their role seriously.
 
Airport

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,342
7,097
113
moe said:
lol oh cry me a river. It's not a terrible idea. Why send the articles to the Senate for a sham "trial" where he can be "acquitted"? Senate Repubs have already made it clear that they have zero intention of taking their role seriously.
Click to expand...
Cause he didn't break any law, you idiot.
 
M

muthed

All-Conference
Aug 25, 2018
3,273
1,886
0
moe said:
lol oh cry me a river. It's not a terrible idea. Why send the articles to the Senate for a sham "trial" where he can be "acquitted"? Senate Repubs have already made it clear that they have zero intention of taking their role seriously.
Click to expand...
Just following the lead of the House in not taking their role seriously.
 
bornaneer

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
30,950
1,667
113
moe said:
lol oh cry me a river. It's not a terrible idea. Why send the articles to the Senate for a sham "trial" where he can be "acquitted"? Senate Repubs have already made it clear that they have zero intention of taking their role seriously.
Click to expand...
I couldn't care less.....looks like your tribe is doing all the "crying"........yep.......let's impeach the "mother *****".
 
M

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
284
83
muthed said:
Just following the lead of the House in not taking their role seriously.
Click to expand...
The House started the impeachment process, held hearings and impeached Trump. Why would you say the House was not serious? it's not fake news.
 
DvlDog4WVU

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,248
3,314
113
moe said:
The House started the impeachment process, held hearings and impeached Trump. Why would you say the House was not serious? it's not fake news.
Click to expand...
Cool, until they send it to the Senate, they did the equivalent of drafting a very stern resolution. Hahahahha and this too shall backfire on her.

#PelosisWaterloo
 
J

JWG66

All-Conference
Dec 31, 2013
13,074
1,604
113
bornaneer said:
I couldn't care less.....looks like your tribe is doing all the "crying"........yep.......let's impeach the "mother *****".
Click to expand...

Wow this is going to play out super on the campaign trail. A permanent indictment that the defendant never gets a speedy trial. Average Americans will relate well to that. Think that’s how Iran & North Korea run their system of justice.
 
bornaneer

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
30,950
1,667
113
moe said:
Yeah, you've only started 2 threads on it today. got it.
Click to expand...
Only pointing out the obvious.....I had already figured out that they might go this route. If they withhold the articles it will only bolster my points about this entire sham.
 
DvlDog4WVU

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,248
3,314
113
bornaneer said:
Only pointing out the obvious.....I had already figured out that they might go this route. If they withhold the articles it will only bolster my points about this entire sham.
Click to expand...
Schumer is ineffective as an orator. All McConnell has to say is that “We’ll evaluate the process and articles once the House delivers them. We have no idea why they’re withholding them”

Considering the urgency Pelosi proclaimed in the lead up, every day that passes works against her and their credibility, as if there was any to begin with.
 
E

eerdoc

Redshirt
May 29, 2001
24,014
26
48
bornaneer said:
LOL......Wonder what she would call Pencil Neck?

Nancy Pelosi on Thursday defended her decision to hold off on sending impeachment articles to the Senate, calling Mitch McConnell a "rogue leader" in an unusual press conference where she repeatedly tried to shut down questions about the impeachment process.
Click to expand...
Poor little Nancy! She be pissed because she not get her way in Senate.She allowed a totally unfair process in the House and now wants to direct the Senate on how to be fair. Unbelievable!!!
Maybe the Senate could create a Senate Rule, similar to what Shiff, Pelosi, et. al. did in the House that eliminated the Republicans from practicing. equal justice for Trump, wherein they state that, since they are obligated, by law, to begin the impeachment trial within a stated time frame they require that the documents from the House be in their hands within 96 hours after approval by the House or a verdict of ‘not guilty’ shall be automatically assigned to the case and these articles of impeachment shall never be again available for subsequent actions against this defendant.
Something needs to be done to bring the lying low lives in the House back to governing in a Constitutional fashion. Take note folks and vote this mob of Socialist/Communists out of office in Nov 2020.
 
Last edited:
C

cam_blev

Senior
Oct 7, 2005
6,467
690
113
moe said:
lol oh cry me a river. It's not a terrible idea. Why send the articles to the Senate for a sham "trial" where he can be "acquitted"? Senate Repubs have already made it clear that they have zero intention of taking their role seriously.
Click to expand...
Ok then I would ask why impeach him in the first place? Was it all for validation and to stroke egos?
 
M

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
284
83
bornaneer said:
Only pointing out the obvious.....I had already figured out that they might go this route. If they withhold the articles it will only bolster my points about this entire sham.
Click to expand...
Of course you have it all figured out. So here's your chance, tell us what happens next.
 
M

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
284
83
cam_blev said:
Ok then I would ask why impeach him in the first place? Was it all for validation and to stroke egos?
Click to expand...
Because the POTUS abused the power of his office and obstructed Congress during the impeachment inquiry. He shook down (bribed) a foreign president by withholding congressionally approved tax money in order to try to get the Ukraine to investigate his political rival. He did it for his own personal gain not in advancement of some broader U.S. policy.
 
bornaneer

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
30,950
1,667
113
moe said:
Of course you have it all figured out. So here's your chance, tell us what happens next.
Click to expand...
I'll let it play out........I'm in a win-win position. You hypocrites have painted yourselves into a corner.......just what you deserve.
 
M

MichiganHerd

All-American
Aug 17, 2011
44,277
9,609
0
Just when the democrats couldn't play this even dumber than they've played it already, they now try this stunt, which is only going to piss off Tulsi, Independents, and Republicans even more.

When is Tulsi announcing her switch to the GOP?
 
M

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
284
83
bornaneer said:
I'll let it play out........I'm in a win-win position. You hypocrites have painted yourselves into a corner.......just what you deserve.
Click to expand...
Yeah whatever smh. Repubs getting ready to say they are fine with POTUS inviting foreign interference in our elections, solid position by your gang. Run with it.
 
M

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
284
83
MichiganHerd said:
Just when the democrats couldn't play this even dumber than they've played it already, they now try this stunt, which is only going to piss off Tulsi, Independents, and Republicans even more.

When is Tulsi announcing her switch to the GOP?
Click to expand...
You got one thing right, Repubs mad.
 
C

cam_blev

Senior
Oct 7, 2005
6,467
690
113
moe said:
withholding congressionally approved tax money in order to try to get the Ukraine to investigate his political rival
Click to expand...
Hypothetically, if Biden as the former VP did have shady dealing in Ukraine and it appeared as if Ukraine also played a part in "meddling with out elect" do you believe that should be investigated?
 
M

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
284
83
cam_blev said:
Hypothetically, if Biden as the former VP did have shady dealing in Ukraine and it appeared as if Ukraine also played a part in "meddling with out elect" do you believe that should be investigated?
Click to expand...
Who would do either investigation? Would you not need some basis for either investigation? Repubs seem to be mad that Hunter Biden got a job in the Ukraine due to his last name, is that a crime?
 
bornaneer

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
30,950
1,667
113
moe said:
Who would do either investigation? Would you not need some basis for either investigation? Repubs seem to be mad that Hunter Biden got a job in the Ukraine due to his last name, is that a crime?
Click to expand...
I never said that Hunter Biden committed a crime....in fact.....I posted it was a "perk" of his fathers position.......BUT......what Joe admitted to on tape are the same actions that you say are a crime.......holding up aid and telling a foreign gov official to fire a prosecutor.
 
T

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,338
59
48
moe said:
Because the POTUS abused the power of his office and obstructed Congress during the impeachment inquiry. He shook down (bribed) a foreign president by withholding congressionally approved tax money in order to try to get the Ukraine to investigate his political rival. He did it for his own personal gain not in advancement of some broader U.S. policy.
Click to expand...

If a president vetos any bills going forward, is that Obstruction of Congress?
 
M

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
284
83
bornaneer said:
I never said that Hunter Biden committed a crime....in fact.....I posted it was a "perk" of his fathers position.......BUT......what Joe admitted to on tape are the same actions that you say are a crime.......holding up aid and telling a foreign gov official to fire a prosecutor.
Click to expand...
Trump was doing this for his personal political gain and Joe did that to get rid of an ineffective prosecutor and did not do it for any political or personal gain. Apparently other countries wanted that prosecutor gone as well, the one Joe got rid of.
 
E

eerdoc

Redshirt
May 29, 2001
24,014
26
48
cam_blev said:
Hypothetically, if Biden as the former VP did have shady dealing in Ukraine and it appeared as if Ukraine also played a part in "meddling with out elect" do you believe that should be investigated?
Click to expand...
Of course!
 
M

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
284
83
TarHeelEer said:
Why not? He or she is impeding their progress.
Click to expand...
So you think that vetoing legislation is the same as ignoring subpoenas and requests for documents, etc. during an impeachment or other type of congressional inquiry? :joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy:
 
C

countryroads89_rivals

Sophomore
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
moe said:
So you think that vetoing legislation is the same as ignoring subpoenas and requests for documents, etc. during an impeachment or other type of congressional inquiry? :joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy:
Click to expand...

He's a moron.
 
3

30CAT

All-American
May 29, 2001
171,226
5,156
113
moe said:
He shook down (bribed) a foreign president by withholding congressionally approved tax money in order to try to get the Ukraine to investigate his political rival.
Click to expand...

Then why did they not impeach him for that? Two articles of impeachment and bribery was NOT one of them.
 
3

30CAT

All-American
May 29, 2001
171,226
5,156
113
moe said:
Trump was doing this for his personal political gain
Click to expand...

Your assumption, but no proof. He didn't say "do me a favor" he said "do us a favor"

An allegation is not proof. Next?

moe said:
Joe did that to get rid of an ineffective prosecutor and did not do it for any political or personal gain.
Click to expand...

Joe said to fire the prosecutor or they were not getting the money. That's exactly what the left accused Trump of doing, hypocrite.

It's sad but true. The left points fingers and accuses others of what the left is actually doing.

This whole impeachment is a joke and Pelosi is proving they don't have $h!t. It was all political and it's blowing up in the left's faces.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom