Neil Gorsuch Disses DJT....

Dec 17, 2007
14,566
408
83
...when do you think we'll hear about Gorsuch stepping down from the nomination and the Next Man Up presented?

President Donald Trump's nominee for the Supreme Court has called the president's recent criticism of the judiciary "disheartening" and "demoralizing," a spokesman for the nomination confirmation team told NBC News on Wednesday.
 
Dec 7, 2010
20,602
120
0
...when do you think we'll hear about Gorsuch stepping down from the nomination and the Next Man Up presented?

President Donald Trump's nominee for the Supreme Court has called the president's recent criticism of the judiciary "disheartening" and "demoralizing," a spokesman for the nomination confirmation team told NBC News on Wednesday.
I'm sure Trumplethinskin won't mind that at all. [roll]The irony is that Gorsuch increased his stock with those comments among those who may haven't been supportive.
 

Airport

All-Conference
Dec 12, 2001
82,081
2,244
113
...when do you think we'll hear about Gorsuch stepping down from the nomination and the Next Man Up presented?

President Donald Trump's nominee for the Supreme Court has called the president's recent criticism of the judiciary "disheartening" and "demoralizing," a spokesman for the nomination confirmation team told NBC News on Wednesday.

Is this what was reported by Sen, I'm lying, Blumenthal?
 

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,555
40
31
There was push back on this from Fox News this morning from the Gorsuch team. They said he didn't say it and Blumenthal has been known to not be truthful in the past.
Hmmmm...

"Former GOP Sen. Kelly Ayotte, who is helping shepherd Gorsuch's nomination on the Hill said in a statement Thursday Gorsuch has told senators "he finds any criticism of a judge's integrity and independence disheartening and demoralizing."

"Gorsuch spokesman Ron Bonjean, who was tapped by the White House to head communications for Gorsuch, confirmed that Gorsuch used those words in his meeting with Blumenthal."

The only push back I can find is from our crybaby in chief.
 
Dec 17, 2007
14,566
408
83
There was push back on this from Fox News this morning from the Gorsuch team. They said he didn't say it and Blumenthal has been known to not be truthful in the past.
And the cover-up begins....

Ron Bonjean, who is leading communications for Gorsuch during the confirmation process, confirmed Gorsuch called Trump's tweet about the "so-called judge" "disheartening" and "demoralizing" in his conversation with Blumenthal.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/08/politics/gorsuch-trump-tweets/
 

lenny4wvu

Redshirt
May 17, 2009
5,290
25
35
Hmmmm...

"Former GOP Sen. Kelly Ayotte, who is helping shepherd Gorsuch's nomination on the Hill said in a statement Thursday Gorsuch has told senators "he finds any criticism of a judge's integrity and independence disheartening and demoralizing."

"Gorsuch spokesman Ron Bonjean, who was tapped by the White House to head communications for Gorsuch, confirmed that Gorsuch used those words in his meeting with Blumenthal."

The only push back I can find is from our crybaby in chief.
Blumenthal > LIAR
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,573
756
113
Yippee. Is this the libtard faux outrage story of the day, or is this just the warmup?
 

WhiteTailEER

Sophomore
Jun 17, 2005
11,534
170
0
Blumenthal > LIAR

You don't read well.
Former GOP Sen. Kelly Ayotte ... said in a statement Thursday Gorsuch has told senators "he finds any criticism of a judge's integrity and independence disheartening and demoralizing."

""Gorsuch spokesman Ron Bonjean ... confirmed that Gorsuch used those words in his meeting with Blumenthal."

Blumenthal isn't the one saying it ... 2 other people are confirming it happened during a meeting with Blumenthal
 

TarHeelEer

Redshirt
Dec 15, 2002
89,286
37
48
I agree......but I enjoy a good laugh......keep your comments coming.

 

bamaEER

Freshman
May 29, 2001
32,435
60
0
These jackasses now are on board with believing only what Trumplethinskin tells them. It's comical how stupid some people are. Of course it's sad too since stupid people put us in this mess.
There is a lot of truth to this post. Trump lies constantly. Now his lies are just white noise to his minions and they don't even hear them anymore.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,573
756
113
There is a lot of truth to this post. Trump lies constantly. Now his lies are just white noise to his minions and they don't even them anymore.
Shocked to see you speak out against Trump!!!!!
 

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
...when do you think we'll hear about Gorsuch stepping down from the nomination and the Next Man Up presented?

President Donald Trump's nominee for the Supreme Court has called the president's recent criticism of the judiciary "disheartening" and "demoralizing," a spokesman for the nomination confirmation team told NBC News on Wednesday.

Extremely smart statement. He doesn't need to impress the Donald, he needs 8 Dems.
 

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
I think there has been some push back on that. The judges team said he did not say that. Blumenthal has been known to not be truthful in the past.

Fox reported last night the judge's team confirmed the statement. But I agree, Blumenthal is a proven liar. Lied about his Viet Nam record.
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
Yippee. Is this the libtard faux outrage story of the day, or is this just the warmup?

With this President, I'm sure there will be plenty of stories to choose from.

Congratulations, you used the word libtard again. I'll bet that makes you feel so cool.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,573
756
113
With this President, I'm sure there will be plenty of stories to choose from.

Congratulations, you used the word libtard again. I'll bet that makes you feel so cool.
It is such a descriptive and appropriate term. It takes the most descriptive assessment of you and takes less time to type. It not only makes me feel cool, it obviously annoys the **** out of you which makes me laugh.
 

Airport

All-Conference
Dec 12, 2001
82,081
2,244
113
You don't read well.
Former GOP Sen. Kelly Ayotte ... said in a statement Thursday Gorsuch has told senators "he finds any criticism of a judge's integrity and independence disheartening and demoralizing."

""Gorsuch spokesman Ron Bonjean ... confirmed that Gorsuch used those words in his meeting with Blumenthal."

Blumenthal isn't the one saying it ... 2 other people are confirming it happened during a meeting with Blumenthal

Much like when Obama criticized the SC in his state of the union. Nobody on the left said a word, that I can remember. Past presidents have done it but I think I would hold my powder until after the 9th rules for the judge on Oregon. It's just crazy that the 9th doesn't look at the law and what it says. Statements made during a campaign have nothing to do with the law.
 

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,555
40
31
Who is upset over it?
Cucks ITT called it "fake news", wanted to see sources, changed subjects, reported the Judge had pushed back on the Sen's claim, called the Senator a liar, implied NBC News was bad....I mean there's quite a bit ITT. Now are they upset or merely blindly following their beloved crybaby? Hard to read intent in a message board.
 

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
But the hypocrisy on the left is astounding. Obama calls out SCOTUS during his State of the Union speech watched by millions. Alito mouthed the words, "Not True" meaning Obama lied.

And libs are concerned about Trump calling out a few district judges. BTW, I don't mind the 9th Circuit being called out, they are not follwing the law, they are the most overturned Circuit in the country. If they are not going to follow the Constitution but their hearts, they need to be called out:

Stats on how frequently they are overturned. They are not a court, they are a liberal safe space.

But in 2010, perhaps seeking to reclaim its position at the top of the heap, the Ninth Circuit was reversed a startling 19 times (79 percent), three times as many reversals as most circuits had cases before the Supreme Court. The same pattern continued in the 2011 (71 percent) and 2012 terms (86 percent), when the Ninth Circuit was reversed more than twice as many times as most circuits had cases before the Court.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/bench...cuit-leading-pack-most-reversed-jonathan-keim
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
It is such a descriptive and appropriate term. It takes the most descriptive assessment of you and takes less time to type. It not only makes me feel cool, it obviously annoys the **** out of you which makes me laugh.

Not annoying at all. It reinforces what a moron you are. You never have anything of substance to discuss, always wrong about what you are discussing...and you simply respond with fuktard or libtard.
 

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,555
40
31
Much like when Obama criticized the SC in his state of the union. Nobody on the left said a word, that I can remember. Past presidents have done it but I think I would hold my powder until after the 9th rules for the judge on Oregon. It's just crazy that the 9th doesn't look at the law and what it says. Statements made during a campaign have nothing to do with the law.
Oh good, the old the other side did it first routine!! 'Merica.
 
Dec 17, 2007
14,566
408
83
Extremely smart statement. He doesn't need to impress the Donald, he needs 8 Dems.

Aww... someone finally caught on. Well orchestrated by the WH don't you think?

PATX, Spicer used something similar in a briefing last week; not disheartening and demoralizing exactly, but something similar in response to the "so-called" remark. Maybe it was "unfortunate" or something like that. I've tried to search it and can't find it. Do you remember that?
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,573
756
113
Cucks ITT called it "fake news", wanted to see sources, changed subjects, reported the Judge had pushed back on the Sen's claim, called the Senator a liar, implied NBC News was bad....I mean there's quite a bit ITT. Now are they upset or merely blindly following their beloved crybaby? Hard to read intent in a message board.
You seem to love to determine intent. Asking for a named source now means you are upset about the content? Is it crazy to actually want to know if it is true before you start to care? Why is his opinion a big deal at all?
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,573
756
113
Not annoying at all. It reinforces what a moron you are. You never have anything of substance to discuss, always wrong about what you are discussing...and you simply respond with fuktard or libtard.
I can tell it doesn't annoy you at all because you never mention it. It is funny that YOU would suggest that anyone else is "always wrong about what you are discussing". That is laughable considering the source.
 

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
PATX, Spicer used something similar in a briefing last week; not disheartening and demoralizing exactly, but something similar in response to the "so-called" remark. Maybe it was "unfortunate" or something like that. I've tried to search it and can't find it. Do you remember that?

I honestly don't. If he did, I didn't see it reported anywhere.