Newly released satellite data shows NO global warming for 18 years and 6 months

WVPATX

Member
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
Satellite Data Shows No Global Warming For Nearly 19 Years

Michael Bastasch
3:47 PM 06/04/2015



Scientists with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration released a study Thursday claiming there’s no hiatus in global warming. But new satellite-derived temperature measurements show there’s been no global warming for 18 years and six months.
“For 222 months, since December 1996, there has been no global warming at all,” writes climate expert Lord Christopher Monckton, the third viscount Monckton of Brenchley
“This month’s [satellite] temperature – still unaffected by a slowly strengthening el Niño, which will eventually cause temporary warming – passes another six-month milestone, and establishes a new record length for the Pause: 18 years 6 months,” Monckton adds.
Monckton’s data comes as NOAA scientists release updated data purporting to show there’s actually been no hiatus in global warming. NOAA scientists made adjustments to temperature records to show more than twice as much warming as the old analysis at the global scale from 1998 to 2012.

“Newly corrected and updated global surface temperature data from NOAA’s [National Centers for Environmental Information] do not support the notion of a global warming ‘hiatus,’” wrote NOAA scientists in a new study.
The difference between Monckton’s data and NOAA’s data is that satellites measure the lowest few miles of the atmosphere, temperature measurements from government scientists rely on thousands of weather stations, buoys and ships across the world’s surface.
Both satellites and surface temperature readings, however, showed prolonged periods without statistically significant warming trends — 15 years for surface temperatures and more than 18 years for satellites.
Scientists have already pushed back against NOAA’s new study. The news site Mashable interviewed about a dozen climate scientists not involved in the study, and nearly all of them said “the study does not support the authors’ conclusion that the so-called warming pause never happened.”
“Instead, they said it simply proves that changing the start and end dates used for analyzing temperature trends has a big influence on those measurements, a fact that was already widely known,” Mashable reported.
“The main claim by the authors that they have uncovered a significant recent warming trend is dubious,” scientists with the libertarian Cato Institute wrote in an open letter on the NOAA study.
“The significance level they report on their findings (.10) is hardly normative, and the use of it should prompt members of the scientific community to question the reasoning behind the use of such a lax standard,” they wrote.
Follow Michael on Twitter and Facebook
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected].
Tags: Cato Institute, Christopher Monckton, Mashable, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration


Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2015/06/04/satellite-data-shows-no-global-warming-for-nearly-19-years/#ixzz3cCYyxHHR
 

Keyser76

New member
Apr 7, 2010
11,912
58
0
Found one ya agree with did ya? Bet the rejected article pile is a lot taller! Only people debating whether it is real or whether we contribute to it are in the bubble. Ill go with the Pope , the majority of scientists and the U.S. Navy when evaluating the threat.
 

WVPATX

Member
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
Found one ya agree with did ya? Bet the rejected article pile is a lot taller! Only people debating whether it is real or whether we contribute to it are in the bubble. Ill go with the Pope , the majority of scientists and the U.S. Navy when evaluating the threat.

I'll go with ACTUAL satellite data since the scientific models of global warming have all be WRONG. If the most intelligent scientist on the planet doesn't believe in man made global warming, why should I?

LOL, you cite the Pope. The Pope also opposes gay marriage and abortion. How do you feel about those two issues?
 

TarHeelEer

New member
Dec 15, 2002
89,280
37
0
Found one ya agree with did ya? Bet the rejected article pile is a lot taller! Only people debating whether it is real or whether we contribute to it are in the bubble. Ill go with the Pope , the majority of scientists and the U.S. Navy when evaluating the threat.

So the Pope is now a climatologist? Who knew?!?!
 

DvlDog4WVU

Well-known member
Feb 2, 2008
46,600
1,462
113
Found one ya agree with did ya? Bet the rejected article pile is a lot taller! Only people debating whether it is real or whether we contribute to it are in the bubble. Ill go with the Pope , the majority of scientists and the U.S. Navy when evaluating the threat.
Did you take the time to read the article he posted?
 

mule_eer

Member
May 6, 2002
20,438
58
48
I think people are cherry picking that date. If you know much about data analysis and stochastic processes, that 1998 data is out of character for the data set. People are focusing on that point because it is a nice peak. No one is cherry picking the valley of 1993 though.
 

TarHeelEer

New member
Dec 15, 2002
89,280
37
0
So the opinions of climatologists are the ones that ought to matter most? Good, glad to see you've finally come around.

No I was making fun of his saying he's on the Pope's side. Anyone getting funding from governments, particularly our's, are not objective. True statement.
 

WVPATX

Member
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
Did you take the time to read the article he posted?

Satellite measurements are much more accurate than surface measurements. THe NOAA only uses surface measurements and they are currently being investigated for the adjustments made to actual readings. Those adjustments almost always make historical temps colder and recent temperatures warmer. One would think that on average, adjustments would go both ways, but not for the NOAA. Thus the investigation.