NFL Draft

mikewebb68

Senior
Oct 24, 2009
9,811
501
113
Daniel Jones taken #6 overall and 2nd QB in the top 6 (Murray) in what was supposed to be the year of the defense. Have to believe this bodes well for CT...

3 BIG players taken in the top-10 as well including one on offense (Hocekenson)
 

DaCat

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
25,587
1,998
113
NYG fans in shocked disbelief that they took Jones that early.
 

mikewebb68

Senior
Oct 24, 2009
9,811
501
113
NYG fans in shocked disbelief that they took Jones that early.

Had a feeling it could happen though-- they wanted a successor to Eli that badly, and it did not appear Jones would last until their second pick.
 

NJCat

All-Conference
Mar 7, 2016
21,375
1,540
113
Had a feeling it could happen though-- they wanted a successor to Eli that badly, and it did not appear Jones would last until their second pick.
I think the Cutcliffe connection with the Mannings is a factor. Jones will sit patiently behind Eli for one or two years and not make waves.
 

corbi2961

Senior
Sep 9, 2005
30,524
786
0
Jones will be a very good starter for them sooner rather than later. Accurate and mobile. I doubt he would have been on the board past the #10 or 11 pick if the Giants had passed.
 

Fanaticat98

Senior
May 29, 2001
9,068
684
113
Crazy, Iowa gets TWO tight ends drafted in the top 20 picks in the same year. Tough to compete with that track record for TE/SB recruits.
 

DaCat

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
25,587
1,998
113
Crazy, Iowa gets TWO tight ends drafted in the top 20 picks in the same year. Tough to compete with that track record for TE/SB recruits.

As long as we keep beating them on the field and make them watch us in the B1G Championship game, I'm okay with that. It is crazy though.
 

torque-cat

Redshirt
Dec 11, 2018
1,234
0
0
As long as we keep beating them on the field and make them watch us in the B1G Championship game, I'm okay with that. It is crazy though.

All the more reason I can never understand why they didn’t throw more to their TEs against us this year. Seemed like they outsmarted themselves.
 

DaCat

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
25,587
1,998
113
Michigan has two players drafted in the first 12 picks. Still haven't played in the B1G championship yet.
 

scru

Redshirt
Sep 4, 2005
2,388
8
0
Mississippi State has 3 picked in 1st round from an 8-5 team that lost to Iowa...
#1 ranked defense in the country last season. Their record was more a function of offensive challenges and difficulty of their schedule.
 

CatManTrue

All-American
Oct 4, 2008
16,541
5,697
97
Jones will be a very good starter for them sooner rather than later. Accurate and mobile. I doubt he would have been on the board past the #10 or 11 pick if the Giants had passed.
That’s an unusual take: I never thought he was particularly good and was surprised by all the hype. He strikes me as a player that needs a lot of development, and the Giants have been a hot mess lately.

At least they didn’t trade up to draft an underwhelming QB, like the Bills or Bears have done recently. It’s surprising how many bad QBs are still selected in the top 10.
 

phatcat_rivals223240

All-Conference
Nov 5, 2001
18,910
1,060
113
#1 ranked defense in the country last season. Their record was more a function of offensive challenges and difficulty of their schedule.
I didn't watch a single play of theirs, but they look like they got bloated on cupcakes, with a couple of impressive wins in there too. More directly, I'd be a little worried if I was their fan base, losing 3 top picks from a mediocre team

Plus they gave up 27 to Ioa :):)
 

TejasCat

Sophomore
Apr 5, 2010
3,032
124
63
I didn't watch a single play of theirs, but they look like they got bloated on cupcakes, with a couple of impressive wins in there too. More directly, I'd be a little worried if I was their fan base, losing 3 top picks from a mediocre team

Plus they gave up 27 to Ioa :):)
I'm guessing you didn't watch that game. Iowa had <200 yds total offense (-15 rushing), 75 (passing TD) came on one play. It was total domination by the Miss St defense. I have no idea how they lost that game (and lost me $$).
 

klemman

Junior
Jan 31, 2002
35,550
225
0
That’s an unusual take: I never thought he was particularly good and was surprised by all the hype. He strikes me as a player that needs a lot of development, and the Giants have been a hot mess lately.

At least they didn’t trade up to draft an underwhelming QB, like the Bills or Bears have done recently. It’s surprising how many bad QBs are still selected in the top 10.

It’s such a crap shot. Get the franchise QB and barring injury, your team is a contender for a decade. Get the wrong QB in the top 10, and as a general manager or coach, you should be updating your resume. Same with if you don’t get a franchise QB via lower draft picks, free agency, or trade.

It makes not taking a potential franchise QB if you’re bad enough to be a top 10 pick team, difficult to pass.
 

Purple Pile Driver

All-Conference
May 14, 2014
27,665
2,992
113
That’s an unusual take: I never thought he was particularly good and was surprised by all the hype. He strikes me as a player that needs a lot of development, and the Giants have been a hot mess lately.

At least they didn’t trade up to draft an underwhelming QB, like the Bills or Bears have done recently. It’s surprising how many bad QBs are still selected in the top 10.
I would take Mitch way before Jones.
 

corbi2961

Senior
Sep 9, 2005
30,524
786
0
That’s an unusual take: I never thought he was particularly good and was surprised by all the hype. He strikes me as a player that needs a lot of development, and the Giants have been a hot mess lately.

At least they didn’t trade up to draft an underwhelming QB, like the Bills or Bears have done recently. It’s surprising how many bad QBs are still selected in the top 10.

Well I have to disagree pretty much across the board. Jones single handedly beat us two years in a row surrounded by a team with otherwise mediocre talent. He is accurate and mobile, the two most important traits for a QB in modern day football. Same goes for Trubisky, who by the way made a pro bowl and only showed a fraction of the talent that will be on full display next year. The draft that supposedly would get Ryan Pace fired has already generated three bowlers while the guy who supposedly “fleeced” Pace, John Lynch, has already released one of his two first round picks from that year, is reportedly looking to trade the other and pretty much has only 1 NFL player to show for the haul of picks he got from the Bears.
 
Last edited:

Purple Pile Driver

All-Conference
May 14, 2014
27,665
2,992
113
Well I have to disagree pretty much across the board. Jones single handedly beat us two years in a row surrounded by a team with otherwise mediocre talent. He is accurate and mobile, the two most important traits for a QB in modern day football. Same goes for Trubisky, who by the way made a pro bowl and only showed a fraction of the talent that will be on full display next year. The draft that supposedly would get Ryan Pace fired generated has already generated three bowlers while the guy who supposedly “fleeced” Pace, John Lynch, has already released one of his two first round picks from that year, is reportedly looking to trade the other and pretty much has only 1 NFL player to show for the haul of picks he got from the Bears.
Still think Mitch would have been there at 3. The risk was another team seeing him as a future stud because the 49ers weren’t taking him. Not sure that was probable. Lynch and teams inability to select the correct player(s) is what prevented the trade from being a fleece or at least comparable.

If you want to give credit to Pace for a fleece, look at what he did to Gruden in the Mack trade.
 

corbi2961

Senior
Sep 9, 2005
30,524
786
0
Still think Mitch would have been there at 3. The risk was another team seeing him as a future stud because the 49ers weren’t taking him. Not sure that was probable. Lynch and teams inability to select the correct player(s) is what prevented the trade from being a fleece or at least comparable.

If you want to give credit to Pace for a fleece, look at what he did to Gruden in the Mack trade.

There were several reports from insiders that Cleveland was actively trying to trade up for that pick to take Ohio boy, Mitch Trubisky.

I didn’t say Pace fleeced Lynch, he gave up fair compensation to insure he got his guy. I am just providing evidence to contest the original narrative that Pace was the one that got fleeced. That was the erroneous consensus at the time.
 
Last edited:

PURPLECAT88

Senior
Feb 4, 2003
7,759
853
113
I still think Pace got fleeced in the trade. The fact that Lynch went out and made bad picks with the haul he got is a completely separate issue.
 

NUCat320

Senior
Dec 4, 2005
19,469
495
0
Well I have to disagree pretty much across the board. Jones single handedly beat us two years in a row surrounded by a team with otherwise mediocre talent. He is accurate and mobile, the two most important traits for a QB in modern day football.
I wonder how he’ll compare, career-wise, to Bortles.
 

corbi2961

Senior
Sep 9, 2005
30,524
786
0
I still think Pace got fleeced in the trade. The fact that Lynch went out and made bad picks with the haul he got is a completely separate issue.

As a Bears fan, I wish Phil Emery had gotten “fleeced” in 2014 when instead of trading up from the 14th pick to insure he got the player he had targeted, he watched then Rams swipe future Hall of Famer Aaron Donald right under the Bears noses. Moral of the story is no amount of draft picks should prevent you from getting the player you need and target if you have conviction on that player.
 

hoosboot

All-American
Nov 7, 2001
26,893
6,534
0
As a Bears fan, I wish Phil Emery had gotten “fleeced” in 2014 when instead of trading up from the 14th pick to insure he got the player he had targeted, he watched then Rams swipe future Hall of Famer Aaron Donald right under the Bears noses. Moral of the story is no amount of draft picks should prevent you from getting the player you need and target if you have conviction on that player.

Totally agree. The challenge is knowing when the player you are trading to get is transformational enough over the player you could otherwise have gotten/will play in the position to merit the cost. Aaron Donald is obviously that kind of transformational difference maker. The jury is still out on Mitch. And I don't think most talent evaluators have the kind of certainty about their convictions in projecting talent that we might hope.
 

TheC

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
19,217
1,305
62
As a Bears fan, I wish Phil Emery had gotten “fleeced” in 2014 when instead of trading up from the 14th pick to insure he got the player he had targeted, he watched then Rams swipe future Hall of Famer Aaron Donald right under the Bears noses. Moral of the story is no amount of draft picks should prevent you from getting the player you need and target if you have conviction on that player.
There's no such thing as a sure thing. That's what makes this fun/excruciating.
 

Purple Pile Driver

All-Conference
May 14, 2014
27,665
2,992
113
As a Bears fan, I wish Phil Emery had gotten “fleeced” in 2014 when instead of trading up from the 14th pick to insure he got the player he had targeted, he watched then Rams swipe future Hall of Famer Aaron Donald right under the Bears noses. Moral of the story is no amount of draft picks should prevent you from getting the player you need and target if you have conviction on that player.
That conviction better be 100% right. The Ricky Williams trade by the Saints set them back years. The Vikings deal for Hershel Walker set the Cowboys up as a dynasty and Vikings never made a SB with Walker. These are two of the worst trades in the history of the NFL.
 

scotthawk1964

Sophomore
Sep 12, 2014
166
154
0
I thought the storyline was Fant was in the doghouse.
Fant is a great athlete, but his blocking is suspect, and if your going to be a TE at Iowa you'd better be able to block. This is why Hockenson went higher because he is a complete TE kind of in the mold of George Kittle who is with the 49ers now. Fant did not play as many snaps because Hock and the other TE they had were much better blockers. For me, I would have kept Fant on the field and just split him out and let his 4.5 speed take a LB out of the middle when running the ball. You can't teach 4.5 speed to most TE's. LOL
 

DaCat

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
25,587
1,998
113
Fant is a great athlete, but his blocking is suspect, and if your going to be a TE at Iowa you'd better be able to block. This is why Hockenson went higher because he is a complete TE kind of in the mold of George Kittle who is with the 49ers now. Fant did not play as many snaps because Hock and the other TE they had were much better blockers. For me, I would have kept Fant on the field and just split him out and let his 4.5 speed take a LB out of the middle when running the ball. You can't teach 4.5 speed to most TE's. LOL

On the behalf of Kirk Ferentz and the Ioa Hawkeyes, I would like to offer you the job of Offensive Coordinator.
 

hdhntr1

All-Conference
Sep 5, 2006
37,697
1,283
113
It’s such a crap shot. Get the franchise QB and barring injury, your team is a contender for a decade. Get the wrong QB in the top 10, and as a general manager or coach, you should be updating your resume. Same with if you don’t get a franchise QB via lower draft picks, free agency, or trade.

It makes not taking a potential franchise QB if you’re bad enough to be a top 10 pick team, difficult to pass.
They should have taken Haskins. Jones injury prone. I also don't understand the Packers taking an underachiever with their first pick
 

NURoseBowl

Junior
Jun 16, 2009
8,142
320
58
That’s an unusual take: I never thought he was particularly good and was surprised by all the hype. He strikes me as a player that needs a lot of development, and the Giants have been a hot mess lately.

At least they didn’t trade up to draft an underwhelming QB, like the Bills or Bears have done recently. It’s surprising how many bad QBs are still selected in the top 10.
2006, you'll find yourself quite pleased with Trubisky this fall. Write that down - and you don't need to use pencil. :cool:
 

corbi2961

Senior
Sep 9, 2005
30,524
786
0
That conviction better be 100% right. The Ricky Williams trade by the Saints set them back years. The Vikings deal for Hershel Walker set the Cowboys up as a dynasty and Vikings never made a SB with Walker. These are two of the worst trades in the history of the NFL.

the Bears were targeting Donald. He fit a need and they correctly concluded he was a special player. If you feel that way, why take the risk that someone will take him one pick before your turn? When you feel that way, I am an advocate for making certain you get him even if you have to use an extra pick or two to go get hm.
 

scru

Redshirt
Sep 4, 2005
2,388
8
0
Zach Allen, former NU DE commit who decommitted and went to BC, goes before any NU player. Frustrating on multiple levels...
 

scru

Redshirt
Sep 4, 2005
2,388
8
0
If only we could trade places with BC’s program.
No thanks, but I'd like us to stop losing recruiting battles to them for top talent. Two players drafted in the first 65 picks... two guys who would have helped us in our talent gap vs the Buckeyes in Indy.