What do you all think of the words between these two?
The ":" is a nice touch but you made the three punctuation errors in parens above and corrected as follows:Bo probably should rethink trying to tear down an icon for something that is commonly done: (T)hat something being( - )going after an (opponents) weakness.
As a side note, is anyone impressed with the use of the ":" in that last sentence? I always like to use them if possible.
Thanks. I was so fixated on the ":' That I did not pay attention to anything else. Thanks for the lesson and keeping me humble.The ":" is a nice touch but you made the three punctuation errors in parens above and corrected as follows:
Bo probably should rethink trying to tear down an icon for something that is commonly done: that something being... going after an opponent's weakness.
Bo is coming off like an idiot. Wrestling is a combat sport and any competitor worth his salt should identify his opponents strengths and weaknesses before the match and wrestle accordingly. Jordan said nothing inappropriate whatsoever.What do you all think of the words between these two?
O State Illustrated Football
DE Malik Charles’ bond with teammates translated to success against Oregon
On3 Football
College Football TV Ratings: Most-watched games of Week 2
O State Illustrated Football Recruiting
Oklahoma State Offers top 2028 Arkansas WR Chase Hancock
Rivals Football Recruiting
Intel and predictions for Texas, Texas A&M, LSU, Oklahoma State, SMU move into the lead for blue-chippers and visitors after Week 2
O State Illustrated Football
OSI Breakdown | Week 2: Oklahoma State 39, Oregon 31