Not so good for Charlie Hustle

BBdK

New member
Sep 21, 2003
90,950
15,048
0
RIP E40 We hardly knew you [laughing][roll]

Loser (nope)
Winner (yep)
Starvin (nope)
Dinner (yep)

[laughing]


 

Deeeefense

Well-known member
Staff member
Aug 22, 2001
43,638
4,637
113
It seems to me that betting as a manger is a lot worse then betting as a player, so this doesn't seem to be any earthshaking news.

I still think the man deserves to be in the Hall.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 55wildcat

MegaBlue05

New member
Mar 8, 2014
10,039
2,684
0
I might be naive, but I still don't see the big deal.

Didn't he only bet on the Reds to win? That, to me, is nothing. Now, if he were betting on the Reds to lose and throwing games with his poor play/managerial decisions, then we have a problem.

As it stands, the only thing he's guilty of is being an idiot who likes to gamble who was confident in his own abilities.
 

Bill@ModernThirst

New member
May 12, 2014
504
67
0
I think it shows a couple things...

1.) he is STILL lying about his gambling, so it makes any case for reinstatement unlikely
2.) he was hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt to the mob from gambling. Kinda raises some real questions about those games he didn't bet.
 

funKYcat75

Well-known member
Apr 10, 2008
32,246
14,789
112
Nancy hope at reinstatement is gone now, for sure. He and a chance to 'fess up to all of this in the 80s ... and 90s ... and 00s ... and 10s ... but continued to stick to his lie(s). He's done.

He's still one of my favorite all time players, but it's over. They'll probably try to un-invite him to the all star stuff too.
 

ZZBlueComet

New member
Feb 4, 2009
46,205
654
0
(d) BETTING ON BALL GAMES. Any player, umpire, or club official or
employee, who shall bet any sum whatsoever upon any baseball game in
connection with which the bettor has no duty to perform shall be declared
ineligible for one year.

Any player, umpire, or club or league official or employee, who shall
bet any sum whatsoever upon any baseball game in connection with which
the bettor has a duty to perform shall be declared permanently ineligible.

It says nowhere "unless the player is a great player" and the rule is posted in every clubhouse, and has been for decades before Rose even started playing. Pete is the one who violated the golden rule - so, Pete has to pay.
Not hard to understand - he was my favorite player (with Bench), but I have to be honest.
 

krazykats

New member
Nov 6, 2006
23,768
2,330
0
Damn, I loved Rose too and his stubborn denials, but you had to know if he didn't care as a coach he sure as hell wouldn't have minded as a player either!

Wish I knew the guy personally he wasn't very good at betting.
 

Beavis606

Well-known member
May 29, 2001
293,150
667
113
As a life long baseball fan (never really a Pete Rose fan) I'm more offended by a Mark McGwire or a Barry Bonds any day than I am Pete Rose -- until you show me evidence that he did something to intentionally lose a game.

Just being a degenerate gambler while giving it his best effort to win on the field or in the dugout doesn't bother me. Taking banned substances to cheat the game bothers me quite a bit. Baseball's record book is tainted forever by the unethical activities of the McGwires, Bonds and Sosas. That is far more damaging to the sport than one addicted moron blowing his money betting on his team to win. All of Pete Rose's hits stand up to history's measure. It makes me sick to think of Barry Bonds holding the career HR record instead of Hank Aaron, and Bonds and McGwire holding the single season mark instead of Maris and Ruth.

There is only one single unpardonable sin in MLB = Do Not Bet On Baseball Games. Every player knows it is the death penalty to do so. There has been a sign saying so posted in every single clubhouse for nearly 100 years.

0% of players, managers, owners and umpires who have been placed on the permanently ineligible list for betting on baseball have been reinstated. 100% of players, managers, owners and umpires who have been placed on the permanently ineligible list for anything else have been reinstated.
 

Beavis606

Well-known member
May 29, 2001
293,150
667
113
^ I guess you missed when Jordan "retired" (lmao) from the association and went off to suck at minor league baseball. I guess you also missed what happened to his father. Baseball is just more open about its punishments than basketball, apparently.
 

rmattox

New member
Nov 26, 2014
6,786
886
0
His performance on the field is the reason he deserves to be in the Hall. Fine if he's banned from participation for the rest of his life. I agree that the drug takers are the real villians. Their behavior had a definite impact on the outcome of games.
 

Beavis606

Well-known member
May 29, 2001
293,150
667
113
His performance on the field is the reason he deserves to be in the Hall. Fine if he's banned from participation for the rest of his life. I agree that the drug takers are the real villians. Their behavior had a definite impact on the outcome of games.

Rule 21 (d) trumps performance on the field.
 
Nov 14, 2001
17,294
25,503
0
The problem with "betting on your team to win" -- unless you bet on every game and bet the same amount on every game -- is it inevitably affects your coaching decisions, which, of course, directly affects the game's integrity.

Let's say that Rose, as manager, knows the Astros are coming into Cincinnati for a three-game series the next day and decides to bet $1,000 on the first game (because of a favorable pitching match-up or whatever). He doesn't have any money on the Cubs game tonight though.

However, tonight's game turns out to be closer than expected. So, instead of bringing in his #1 closer to protect a 1-run lead (because he doesn't have any money on the Cubs game), he brings in someone else, the Reds blow the lead, and lose the game -- all because Rose was going to bet on the Reds to win tomorrow.
 

KingOfBBN

New member
Sep 14, 2013
34,436
3,278
0
Baseball is filled with so many self righteous ********. The fact that Ty Cobb is in the HOF and the fact that drug addicts got a billion chances and steroid users still get to play today while Rose is out, is comical.

He doesn't need the HOF for any validation on an amazing career. He is one of the best to ever play the game. We all know it .
 
Nov 14, 2001
17,294
25,503
0
I get that Maverick. I don't think it is what Rose did, but I get the argument. And as I said above, I'm not on a personal quest to see Rose reinstated. I just think the penalty is outsized for the crime, and I think whatever his motives as a gambler, he harmed the game much less than guys who obliterated the record books while on steroids.

No argument there, I agree about the 'roid abusers. (And I know you understood my post :D. I was directing it to the myopic but-he-only-bet-on-the-Reds-to-win crowd.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: MdWIldcat55

Beavis606

Well-known member
May 29, 2001
293,150
667
113
I just think the penalty is outsized for the crime, and I think whatever his motives as a gambler, he harmed the game much less than guys who obliterated the record books while on steroids.
MLB can define its own crimes and set punishments appropriately. Participants gambling on baseball games can and have harmed MLB financially and otherwise. PEDs (McGwire and Sosa) actually saved baseball and led to astronomical (no Houston) profits and popularity. Team ownership, managers and most of all the commissioner's office encouraged their use until their was a public outcry.
 

KingOfBBN

New member
Sep 14, 2013
34,436
3,278
0
You have to laugh at the difference in the NFL and MLB Hall of Fame.

Michael Irvin slit a guy's throat at training camp and was a coke head and gets elected into the HOF
Pete Rose bet on baseball as a manager and is banned for life.
 

Beavis606

Well-known member
May 29, 2001
293,150
667
113
Ty Cobb probably committed 10 murders that would make the Charleston Church killer blush and get him brought up on Federal hate crime charges today. Babe Ruth, Mickey Mantle, Fergie Jenkins and any number of players inducted in the 80s played all kinds of games while drunk/high. Kirby Puckett and Bobby Cox beat their wives. But, like Irvin, those offenses didn't cost MLB any $$$ or prestige. Rose and the other gamblers did.
 

ktbug

New member
May 29, 2001
8,405
626
0
He had a very long career as a player. He would have had a very long career in managing/commentating but he pissed it away. He lost 25 years of apossible career because of this. He has been punished more than enough. Time to lift the ban.
Alex Rodriguez is still plying btw.
 

Beavis606

Well-known member
May 29, 2001
293,150
667
113
He had a very long career as a player. He would have had a very long career in managing/commentating but he pissed it away. He lost 25 years of apossible career because of this. He has been punished more than enough. Time to lift the ban.
Alex Rodriguez is still plying btw.
He's made millions per year hawking autographs and memorabilia and pimping himself out to go to dinner with the highest bidder. I wish I could piss away into a career like that.
 

Beavis606

Well-known member
May 29, 2001
293,150
667
113
Pete is serving the sentence he received.
A-Roid already served the sentence he received.

If you have a problem with the sentences, blame the players themselves. Baseball wanted harsher penalties but the players' union got concessions in collective bargaining.
 

HossCat73_rivals

New member
Jan 15, 2002
11,528
367
0
Baseball is filled with so many self righteous ********. The fact that Ty Cobb is in the HOF and the fact that drug addicts got a billion chances and steroid users still get to play today while Rose is out, is comical.

He doesn't need the HOF for any validation on an amazing career. He is one of the best to ever play the game. We all know it .

Ty Cobb was a horrible human being, but his on-the-field accomplishments were too significant for him to be left out of the HOF? C'mon.

And what bookie, especially one that's "Connected", actually uses a name for betting slips? You get assigned a number as an identifying marker.
 

domino79

New member
Feb 2, 2008
46,122
582
0
It's not just the gambling, it's being associated with a criminal element who have the power to seriously undermine entire seasons.

Everybody's got the warm and fuzzies over Pete. That's good, good on ya, but go back and study the history of baseball before you let your emotions get the best of you. The sport was in a tailspin before Landis took over and cleaned it up. Gave it some legitimacy. Betting on baseball is unpardonable.
 

Catman100

New member
Jan 3, 2003
6,624
88
0
The problem with "betting on your team to win" -- unless you bet on every game and bet the same amount on every game -- is it inevitably affects your coaching decisions, which, of course, directly affects the game's integrity.

Let's say that Rose, as manager, knows the Astros are coming into Cincinnati for a three-game series the next day and decides to bet $1,000 on the first game (because of a favorable pitching match-up or whatever). He doesn't have any money on the Cubs game tonight though.

However, tonight's game turns out to be closer than expected. So, instead of bringing in his #1 closer to protect a 1-run lead (because he doesn't have any money on the Cubs game), he brings in someone else, the Reds blow the lead, and lose the game -- all because Rose was going to bet on the Reds to win tomorrow.



This X 1,000,000.......Toss in the fact that how many players did he keep in games longer than he should have that may have needed rest? How many pitchers pitched more innings than they should have? How many injuries did he possibly cause by over playing players to try to win bets?

And on the flip side of that, I got news for ya. If he was such a degenerate gambler that was betting every day, if you really think he would bet for the Reds when he had his number 5 starter going up against someone like Steve Carlton, Greg Maddux or Nolan Ryan, then I don't know what to tell you. I totally think he bet against the Reds.
 

Crawfords Corner

New member
Jul 9, 2004
61,343
1,197
0
Not surprising. If Pete's mouth is moving he's lying. I don't understand why anyone would be shocked by this. It's not like Manfred was going to re-instate him though. Anyone who thought that was going to happen might be a little too optimistic for their own good. It's really sad too. If he would have just admitted to this and been contrite he'd already be in the HOF.
 

musrat59

New member
Feb 6, 2004
30,961
1,047
0
He was a hall of fame type Baseball player but you just don't commit the unpardonable sin of betting on the game.
 

Bill@ModernThirst

New member
May 12, 2014
504
67
0
Ty Cobb was a horrible human being, but his on-the-field accomplishments were too significant for him to be left out of the HOF? C'mon.

99% of what people think of Ty Cobb off the field (including the claim he killed someone before a game) has been debunked as fabrication.

Regardless, the issue with gambling is the cardinal sin because it's the most egregious crime you can commit against the "sport" of baseball. Once the outcome is presumed to be predetermined (i.e. one team is trying to lose), it becomes the WWE. It loses its anti-trust exemption and Major League baseball as we know it ceases to be. Fans stop watching entirely.

Baseball has its own laws. Within that framework, gambling is the worst crime you can commit against the sport itself. Hence the ban. I don't really care about Rose one way or the other. But I certainly don't feel sorry for him, and he's certainly not "deserving" of any sort of exemption. He did the crime, now he's doing the time. If baseball wants to change their standards or rules, that's up to them. But if they make an exception just because Rose was good, they're sellouts.
 

Ron Mehico

New member
Jan 4, 2008
15,475
2,062
0
Seems to me anyone that gives a rats *** about the baseball hall of fame are white guys over the age of 50. Baseball just has a weird demographic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: drawing_dead

ktbug

New member
May 29, 2001
8,405
626
0
He's made millions per year hawking autographs and memorabilia and pimping himself out to go to dinner with the highest bidder. I wish I could piss away into a career like that.

He hasn't made millions per year, the guy is pretty much broke.
 

AlbanyWildCat

New member
Mar 18, 2009
6,895
440
0
As a life long baseball fan (never really a Pete Rose fan) I'm more offended by a Mark McGwire or a Barry Bonds any day than I am Pete Rose -- until you show me evidence that he did something to intentionally lose a game.

Just being a degenerate gambler while giving it his best effort to win on the field or in the dugout doesn't bother me. Taking banned substances to cheat the game bothers me quite a bit. Baseball's record book is tainted forever by the unethical activities of the McGwires, Bonds and Sosas. That is far more damaging to the sport than one addicted moron blowing his money betting on his team to win. All of Pete Rose's hits stand up to history's measure. It makes me sick to think of Barry Bonds holding the career HR record instead of Hank Aaron, and Bonds and McGwire holding the single season mark instead of Maris and Ruth.

Greenies...
 

AlbanyWildCat

New member
Mar 18, 2009
6,895
440
0
PEDs (McGwire and Sosa) actually saved baseball and led to astronomical (no Houston) profits and popularity. Team ownership, managers and most of all the commissioner's office encouraged their use until their was a public outcry.

This is 100% correct...nothing has changed.