Obama is tears today

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
The cost of the climate deal was $3 trillion.
Trump decided to stand with the American worker and against globalist elites.

The Dow Jones Industrial also closed at a record high on the news today.


But Barack Hussein Obama wasn’t happy about this news since his goal was to destroy the U.S. He hates seeing his ‘legacy’ unravel as President Trump destroys it one day at a time.

Hussein Obama released a statement following the news about Trump pulling out of the Paris Climate Accord. Remember, Barack Hussein Obama used his power as president to join the Paris Accord WITHOUT a vote in the legislature. Similarly, Trump can use his authority to call it quits.

Here is Hussein Obama’s statement:


 

WVU82_rivals

Senior
May 29, 2001
199,095
686
0
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/448201/paris-agreement-trump-right-pull-out

American presidents have gotten into the disturbing habit of discarding constitutional process when they find it inconvenient. Barack Obama did it when he agreed to the Paris accords, when he negotiated the Iran nuclear deal, and when he launched a war against Libya without congressional approval. Trump did the same earlier this year when he launched a new military action against the Syrian regime, also without congressional approval. But just as presidents must be challenged when they violate the Constitution, they should be applauded when they respect its terms.
 

WVU82_rivals

Senior
May 29, 2001
199,095
686
0
Obama's Paris Agreement: All Cost and No Benefit for the U.S.

http://www.atr.org/obamas-paris-agreement-all-cost-and-no-benefit-us

Today the Obama Administration will sign the Paris climate agreement at a ceremony in New York, a move that is projected to severely impact the U.S. economy with ironically negligible impacts for the environment. The agreement will not only set the stage for increased regulation, but will crush U.S. economic output, reduce household income for millions, and likely lead to hundreds of thousands of lost jobs.

The agreement is a product of the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Paris, where President Obama met with world leaders to commit the U.S. to non-binding emission reduction targets. Under the agreement, Obama committed the U.S. to wholly improbable reduction goals of 26 to 28 percent by year 2025.

Through a litany of regulations stemming from the agreement, Obama has essentially offered up the U.S. economy as a sacrificial lamb to further his own legacy. Sadly, the agreement will not just hurt the country’s growth as a whole, but will trickle down to low-and-middle income Americans. As a result of the agreement, energy costs will skyrocket, in turn raising the cost of utility bills for families and increasing the costs of consumer goods.

A recent study by the Heritage Foundation projects that the Paris agreement and resulting policies will increase electricity costs for a family of four between 13 and 20 percent annually. The study also projected American families will see over $20,000 of lost income by year 2035. Such regressive policy hits the nation’s most vulnerable hardest, who ironically are the same people Obama uses to justify the deal.

The Paris deal is also slated to reduce U.S. GDP by over $2.5 trillion, and result in an average shortfall of nearly 400,000 jobs by 2035. Of the 400,000 jobs lost, an estimated 200,000 will be in the manufacturing sector. This means Americans will also see the costs of consumer goods such as electronics, paper products, and apparel increase, inevitably taking more out of household income.

With such drastic costs to the U.S., American’s would expect an equally drastic benefit on the other end, yet that is simply not the case. Policies such as those resulting from climate deal would, even with a complete elimination of U.S. carbon emissions, result in less than two-tenths of a degree Celsius reduction in global temperatures.

It is all to clear the Paris climate deal is all cost and no benefit for the U.S., and the Obama Administration is comfortable sacrificing low-and-middle income Americans, along with thousands of jobs and GDP, for an environmental benefit that is negligible, at best.
 

atlkvb

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2004
80,033
1,973
113
The cost of the climate deal was $3 trillion.
Trump decided to stand with the American worker and against globalist elites.

The Dow Jones Industrial also closed at a record high on the news today.


But Barack Hussein Obama wasn’t happy about this news since his goal was to destroy the U.S. He hates seeing his ‘legacy’ unravel as President Trump destroys it one day at a time.

Hussein Obama released a statement following the news about Trump pulling out of the Paris Climate Accord. Remember, Barack Hussein Obama used his power as president to join the Paris Accord WITHOUT a vote in the legislature. Similarly, Trump can use his authority to call it quits.

Here is Hussein Obama’s statement:



He's just upset someone else knows how to drive the Ferrari without wrecking it.

He's mad we (voters) took his set of keys away.
 

moe

Sophomore
May 29, 2001
32,565
152
63
The cost of the climate deal was $3 trillion.
Trump decided to stand with the American worker and against globalist elites.

The Dow Jones Industrial also closed at a record high on the news today.


But Barack Hussein Obama wasn’t happy about this news since his goal was to destroy the U.S. He hates seeing his ‘legacy’ unravel as President Trump destroys it one day at a time.

Hussein Obama released a statement following the news about Trump pulling out of the Paris Climate Accord. Remember, Barack Hussein Obama used his power as president to join the Paris Accord WITHOUT a vote in the legislature. Similarly, Trump can use his authority to call it quits.

Here is Hussein Obama’s statement:


The gang of three...the U.S., Nicaragua and Syria, sweet. American leadership is a thing of the past, it was a good run.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
What's amazing to me is that some in this nation actually believe that the entire world is either corrupt or completely duped in regards to climate change. The Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, China....195 nations have stepped up to honor this desire to protect our planets future through a collective effort to drive energy towards cleaner, renewable sources. But yet folks in "the real America" are convinced that it's all a political scheme. I'm just absolutely floored by this. There are many intelligent, passionate, and thorough men and women in these 195 NATIONS! How can you possibly believe it's all a Clinton-Obama scam?
 

EEResistable

All-American
May 29, 2001
89,439
5,690
61
The Paris accord did nothing for global warming. Or global cooling. Which is it this month? Oh we're not sure. Let's call it climate change. You sheep are such fools.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
The Paris accord did nothing for global warming. Or global cooling. Which is it this month? Oh we're not sure. Let's call it climate change. You sheep are such fools.
Even Trump's WH wasn't in agreement on this....but you're so sure you're willing to gamble with your children's future?
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
46,692
1,764
113
What's amazing to me is that some in this nation actually believe that the entire world is either corrupt or completely duped in regards to climate change. The Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, China....195 nations have stepped up to honor this desire to protect our planets future through a collective effort to drive energy towards cleaner, renewable sources. But yet folks in "the real America" are convinced that it's all a political scheme. I'm just absolutely floored by this. There are many intelligent, passionate, and thorough men and women in these 195 NATIONS! How can you possibly believe it's all a Clinton-Obama scam?
I only question the financial impacts and the end state metrics, which, weren't in our favor.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
46,692
1,764
113
It's ok, we'll be back in it soon enough.
So, I've yet to see this addressed. Why does it require us transferring money to other countries? Why can't we just concentrate on our nation?
 

bornaneer

Senior
Jan 23, 2014
30,216
844
113
American leadership is a thing of the past, it was a good run.
Glad you finally admitted it.....sorry it took you 8 years. However...we have hope since we have a new sheriff in town.
 

op2

Senior
Mar 16, 2014
11,213
594
103
What's amazing to me is that some in this nation actually believe that the entire world is either corrupt or completely duped in regards to climate change. The Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, China....195 nations have stepped up to honor this desire to protect our planets future through a collective effort to drive energy towards cleaner, renewable sources. But yet folks in "the real America" are convinced that it's all a political scheme. I'm just absolutely floored by this. There are many intelligent, passionate, and thorough men and women in these 195 NATIONS! How can you possibly believe it's all a Clinton-Obama scam?

Exactly. The whole freaking world believes it but they're all wrong and somehow a certain segment of America has some wisdom that eludes the rest of the world on this issue. It doesn't even make any sense.
 

bornaneer

Senior
Jan 23, 2014
30,216
844
113
Even Trump's WH wasn't in agreement on this....but you're so sure you're willing to gamble with your children's future?
You are gambling more with your children's future when you feed them their Pop Tarts every morning.
 

moe

Sophomore
May 29, 2001
32,565
152
63
Glad you finally admitted it.....sorry it took you 8 years. However...we have hope since we have a new sheriff in town.
lol Nope this has occurred since Trump took over and especially since yesterday. It's cool though, others will take our former leadership role on various issues. It's already begun. Fortunately Trump is working hard to make himself a one term prez so this dark chapter in U.S. history won't last long and we'll recover from it.
 

TarHeelEer

Redshirt
Dec 15, 2002
89,286
37
48
Exactly. The whole freaking world believes it but they're all wrong and somehow a certain segment of America has some wisdom that eludes the rest of the world on this issue. It doesn't even make any sense.

How many are handing out money to other countries, and how many are on the take?
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
46,692
1,764
113
Exactly. The whole freaking world believes it but they're all wrong and somehow a certain segment of America has some wisdom that eludes the rest of the world on this issue. It doesn't even make any sense.
We didn't back out of it because a lacking of belief of occurrence. We backed out because of the financial disparities in the deal and the ceding of authority from our country to a world body. You don't even understand the motivation and rational and are criticizing this decision.
 

op2

Senior
Mar 16, 2014
11,213
594
103
We didn't back out of it because a lacking of belief of occurrence. We backed out because of the financial disparities in the deal and the ceding of authority from our country to a world body. You don't even understand the motivation and rational and are criticizing this decision.

What authority? It was voluntary. There was no authority ceded at all.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
I only question the financial impacts and the end state metrics, which, weren't in our favor.
Buddy of mine was fvcking a girlfriend of a popular football player in college, he of course found out and came to take back his pride with two fellow behemoths. I knew it wasn't going to be good for me, but I knew what I had to do.

Sometimes that's the way it goes. In a way, we asked for it.
 

atlkvb

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2004
80,033
1,973
113
The gang of three...the U.S., Nicaragua and Syria, sweet. American leadership is a thing of the past, it was a good run.

Manuel Noriega and the Sandinistas in Nicaragua were the darlings of the Left back in the 80's when Reagan was battling Communist expansion in Central America.

Syria was the aggrieved party to the Left in this country after Israel captured the Golan Heights following the '67 War, and the Left has been sympathetic to their claims against Jewish "expansionism" up until Obama allowed Assad & the Russians to cross his vaunted "Red line".

You guys need to make up your minds who's side you're on?
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
How does our backing out inhibit us from continuing to take steps towards improving our carbon emissions? Why in your mind does it require ceding control to a world body and not allowing our country to chart the path most advantageous for us?
This was a world accord, imo, it was a collective agreement to not allow any one nation from benefitting from the scaling back of emissions in other countries. Kind of like a proliferation treaty. And I agree that the US should shoulder a greater load than other nations, we've been the biggest energy user for decades.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
How does our backing out inhibit us from continuing to take steps towards improving our carbon emissions? Why in your mind does it require ceding control to a world body and not allowing our country to chart the path most advantageous for us?
There are going to have to be things that are tackled and envisioned from a global perspective going forward. Terrorism, the environment, cyberwarefare, etc.... It's time to work as a team on many issues.....this is one.
 

TarHeelEer

Redshirt
Dec 15, 2002
89,286
37
48
This was a world accord, imo, it was a collective agreement to not allow any one nation from benefitting from the scaling back of emissions in other countries. Kind of like a proliferation treaty. And I agree that the US should shoulder a greater load than other nations, we've been the biggest energy user for decades.

I know it's at least $100 billion per year. How much is it?
 

atlkvb

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2004
80,033
1,973
113
How can you possibly believe it's all a Clinton-Obama scam?

Because no one among those 195 nations can tell us when or how we actually "change" the climate?

Especially without American $$$$$$$.

So America by itself can prevent 192 other nations from "changing" our climate?

Maybe they can build a giant plastic bubble over us and let us choke on our own filth while they breathe the rest of the pristine clean air they've created or "changed"?
 

atlkvb

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2004
80,033
1,973
113
This was a world accord, imo, it was a collective agreement to not allow any one nation from benefitting from the scaling back of emissions in other countries. Kind of like a proliferation treaty. And I agree that the US should shoulder a greater load than other nations, we've been the biggest energy user for decades.

Hey boom...why don't we just sit back and let the other 192 nations show us how its done?

Then once they all figure out how to "change" our climate...they can offer us the technology to catch up, and we can all vote here on it after seeing how well it's worked?

Isn't that true "Democracy" in action?