Re: Maybe instead of going with the right-wing media hysteria ...
Originally posted by Popeer:
Originally posted by DvlDog4WVU:
Wonder if the gun control people realize Obama is responsible for more purchases and distribution of ammo than anytime since the ludicrous "assault weapons ban" was lifted. Maybe more than then, I haven't seen the numbers.
I'm not sure what your point is. The first assault weapons ban was pushed through by Ronald Reagan, who said he didn't see why the Bloods and Crips should be armed better than the LAPD. He didn't stop buying M-16s or .45s or 9mm Berettas for the military and Federal law enforcement agencies.
Maybe we are talking about different AWBs. The one I am talking about was the one in 94 under Clinton. The one under Reagan regulated the sale of very selective and small list of imported weapons.
The classifications selected to classify an assault weapon in the 94 AWB were what was ludicrous. They were all cosmetic and did nothing but cause the manufacturers to change the cosmetics. It did nothing to truly curb the weapons operation and lethality. In studies post AWB they determined the ban did not create any meaningful statistical data on its effect which was why Bush allowed it to expire.
Here is what it encompassed for media portrayed "assault weapons" such as AR-15s.
Telescoping Stock: Cosmetic (went with a fixed stock)
Pistol Grip: Cosmetic (re-engineered the stocks to have a built in pistol grip)
Bayonet Mount: Cosmetic (removed)
Grenade Launcher: Attachment. You couldn't get "grenades" for them to begin with without a Class III Weapons License (possession requires you to voluntarily give up your 4th amendment right), you could buy smoke and flares. You could still buy a standalone launcher for those rounds.
Flash Suppressor: Cosmetic (Removed)