Clearly clueless if you think him leaving for UCLA had anything to do about basketball.Yes better if Myles were the backup. I don’t deny that. But I believe Myles didn’t want the likely demotion so he transferred.
Clearly clueless if you think him leaving for UCLA had anything to do about basketball.Yes better if Myles were the backup. I don’t deny that. But I believe Myles didn’t want the likely demotion so he transferred.
says you. ask fluxxie the probability of choosing the most acclaimed program in history, fresh off a Final Four just being pure coincidence. Sure, he’s from the area and UCLA is a great school, but not the only reasonsClearly clueless if you think him leaving for UCLA had anything to do about basketball.
Lmao, Myles going to the top rated engineering school in the country was the primary reason. He was a student first then a basketball player.says you. ask fluxxie the probability of choosing the most acclaimed program in history, fresh off a Final Four just being pure coincidence. Sure, he’s from the area and UCLA is a great school, but not the only reasons
there’s a big difference bewteen ‘Primary Reason’ and ‘had nothing to do with basketball’. Reading Is Fundamental. Comprehension is not, sadly. Also, just because you say it’s the top rated doesn’t make it so. I’ll wait for your proof.
What are you talking about man?nah, ‘the idea is correct’ is not at all correct when you give a precise probability ci.
Man, I’m talking your probability model isn’t applicable. Square peg round hole.What are you talking about man?
You make an assumption (the trials are iid) and then you calculate the interval. The interval is mathematically correct. The assumption is a simplification of reality. This is literally how any statistical model of any sport works.
Also violating the assumption in this case would actually increase the variance, making the interval even wider.