OJ: Made in America

Deeeefense

Well-known member
Staff member
Aug 22, 2001
43,644
4,676
113
Simpson was declared guilty in the subsequent civil, wrongful death trial and the plaintiffs were awarded a bunch of cash. I seem to recall he fled to Florida at that point to avoid forking up the damage awards to the victims families. I lost track as to if they ever collected or not.
 

Violent Cuts

New member
Jun 22, 2001
26,917
1,192
0
They were awarded $33 million. The Goldman's fought for every penny, not really for the money but wanting him to know that they would never stop. He hid a lot of his assets in various storage facilities, funneled money through other fake organizations, moved to Florida so his income couldn't be collected there, and did everything he could to not pay them anything. The Goldmans even got the rights to his book.

Some of his creditors took nearly everything including his Heisman. It drove him so crazy that it is what inevitably got him in jail. I'm sure the Goldmans and Browns got quite a bit but they'll obviously never get everything. In the documentary they theorize that he got 33 years in jail as a reminder that they were awarded $33 million.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deeeefense

Mojocat_rivals48469

New member
Jan 29, 2003
18,120
3,074
0
Watching episode 3 right now. Here's a direct quote from the jury consultant, right after the jury was seated:

"75% of the actual jurors believed he could not have committed these murders because he excelled at football at USC."

At that point, it didn't matter whether the prosecution and police were world class or the Keystone Cops - fate was sealed.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Violent Cuts

Mojocat_rivals48469

New member
Jan 29, 2003
18,120
3,074
0
It's funny and ironic listening to the anger coming from Cochran and Douglas and others when Darden said if you let Fuhrmans use of the N word into court, the jury will not be able to unhear it - they'll fixate on race. Obviously that was true, and yet here is Douglas 20 years later still incredulous.......There are good reasons why people hate lawyers, and defense lawyers in particular.
 

legalbeagle123

New member
Jun 16, 2001
28,376
1,171
0
Another good point made about jury selection was that there are people who can afford to put their lives on hold for 6 months and go into sequestration and people who cannot. The former has a higher percentage of dumbasses.

Also, not that I feel any sympathy for him at all, but that sentence in Nevada is complete horseshit. If that's anyone else but OJ, it's probably felony probation at worst, and more likely amended to a misdemeanor. Karma is a ***** though.
 

Mojocat_rivals48469

New member
Jan 29, 2003
18,120
3,074
0
Another good point made about jury selection was that there are people who can afford to put their lives on hold for 6 months and go into sequestration and people who cannot. The former has a higher percentage of dumbasses.
.
Yep. That's when Douglas said "people from lower socio-economic status" would be able to miss work for 6 months, and he said those were "our kind of jurors." I'm imagining someone from another country seeing this and being exposed to the American justice system for the first time. They'd have to be thinking its a farce and a circus....
 

Deeeefense

Well-known member
Staff member
Aug 22, 2001
43,644
4,676
113
Yep. That's when Douglas said "people from lower socio-economic status" would be able to miss work for 6 months, and he said those were "our kind of jurors." I'm imagining someone from another country seeing this and being exposed to the American justice system for the first time. They'd have to be thinking its a farce and a circus....

Yea, I know lawyers will probably disagree but it just seems like jury trials are like a football game, and the team that has the best coaches (lawyers), the best players (experts, witnesses, consultants) and the most resources (money for research and investigation) will ultimately win the contest. An OJ Simpson with a dream team can get away with murder - literally, but some poor black guy falsely accused of a robbery with court appointed attorney and a $4000 defense budget is probably doomed from the get go. I would like to see some stats or a chart that show the amount of money spent on criminal defense cases, compared to the number of convictions. I would be shocked if there isn't a direct relation to money spent and acquittals.

So is a contest really the best way to seek truth and justice?
 

College#19

Active member
Feb 2, 2011
41,373
185
63
My only question in regards to OJ will be if he ever admits it. I could see him getting out of Prison at some point and writing a book on his admission. OJ is messed up in the head
 
  • Like
Reactions: mashburned

musrat59

New member
Feb 6, 2004
30,961
1,047
0
I watched a good portion of the trial from the very beginning and they mountains of evidence to convict OJ, but all the evidence in the world wouldn't have convinced this particular jury to convict him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chuckinden

AlbanyWildCat

New member
Mar 18, 2009
6,895
440
0
You left out reasonable under your description of the burden of proof.

The cental detective in the case was on tape saying racists statements and how the LAPD alwats plants evidence to ensure their case is solid. Maybe you have a different classification of reasonalbe...probably so...but the defense did what it was paid to do.

Rich people always find a way to beat the system...poor and middle class folks do not enjoy such comforts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Violent Cuts

UK_Is_Good

New member
Dec 7, 2005
11,735
442
0
The cental detective in the case was on tape saying racists statements and how the LAPD alwats plants evidence to ensure their case is solid. Maybe you have a different classification of reasonalbe...probably so...but the defense did what it was paid to do.

Rich people always find a way to beat the system...poor and middle class folks do not enjoy such comforts.

I thought it was interesting when Clark said if she didn't know it wasn't possible for him to plant the glove then she probably would've bought the defense.
 

Saguaro Cat

Well-known member
Apr 27, 2008
15,541
1,593
113
Finally got to watch episode 5 last night. I'm surprised more isn't being made out of his agents interview. He says Oj told Al Cowlings that he did go to Nicole's the night of the murder, but didn't do it. And when the agent asked, he says Oj told him that she would still be alive if she didn't answer the door with a knife in her hands.
 

wcc31

Well-known member
Mar 18, 2002
504,733
11,721
98
Cowlings is such an interesting figure in the entire story. You have to wonder where he stands these days. He was obviously a very loyal friend to OJ, but he was also very close to Nicole. T
 

Bill Derington

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2003
17,690
2,057
113
Cowlings is such an interesting figure in the entire story. You have to wonder where he stands these days. He was obviously a very loyal friend to OJ, but he was also very close to Nicole. T

In the book OJ said he had an accomplice, as close and loyal as Cowlings was to him could it have been him?

It was odd how he broke down in the civil trial when shown a picture of Nicole.
 

Guess Who

New member
Jul 26, 2005
20,792
3,245
0
Has anyone here read OJ's book "If I did it"? I'm curious but don't care to spend the money on it.
 

UKserialkiller

New member
Dec 13, 2009
34,297
35,841
0
Has anyone here read OJ's book "If I did it"? I'm curious but don't care to spend the money on it.


Yep. He writes the book as "IF" he was going to do it.

Surprisingly though, If OJ was going to do it, he would've have done it just like the "real killer".

Weird how OJ and the "real killer" had the exact same plan.
 

Guess Who

New member
Jul 26, 2005
20,792
3,245
0
Yep. He writes the book as "IF" he was going to do it.

Surprisingly though, If OJ was going to do it, he would've have done it just like the "real killer".

Weird how OJ and the "real killer" had the exact same plan.
Damn OJ sounds pretty smart! :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:
 
  • Like
Reactions: UKserialkiller
Mar 19, 2006
1,068
16
38
The cental detective in the case was on tape saying racists statements and how the LAPD alwats plants evidence to ensure their case is solid. Maybe you have a different classification of reasonalbe...probably so...but the defense did what it was paid to do.

Rich people always find a way to beat the system...poor and middle class folks do not enjoy such comforts.

You are correct, I do not find it reasonable. There was no evidence connecting Fuhrman to a cover up in this case.

Fuhrman could have rolled into the court room sporting a grand wizard robe, and it should not have established reasonable doubt.

You are also correct that the defense did its job. The judge, jury, and prosecution absolutely did not.

Best legal system in the world?

LOL
 

Blue63Madison

New member
May 21, 2002
35,727
388
0
In the book OJ said he had an accomplice, as close and loyal as Cowlings was to him could it have been him?
There's no way anyone could have left that horrific crime scene without leaving footprints. OJ's were the only prints at or around the scene. His book was nothing but a failed attempt to make money. I'm sure there's another book coming when he's released from prison.
 
  • Like
Reactions: musrat59

Bill Derington

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2003
17,690
2,057
113
There's no way anyone could have left that horrific crime scene without leaving footprints. OJ's were the only prints at or around the scene. His book was nothing but a failed attempt to make money. I'm sure there's another book coming when he's released from prison.

Maybe so, it just seemed curious that in the book he claimed the accomplice took his clothes.
 

Guess Who

New member
Jul 26, 2005
20,792
3,245
0
In the book OJ said he had an accomplice, as close and loyal as Cowlings was to him could it have been him?

It was odd how he broke down in the civil trial when shown a picture of Nicole.
Cowlings seems to be above OJ's scruples but who really knows. It didn't show which pic of Nicole it was but was probably one of them that showed her battered up. Did book say what happened to the murder weapon?
 

Bill Derington

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2003
17,690
2,057
113
Cowlings seems to be above OJ's scruples but who really knows. It didn't show which pic of Nicole it was but was probably one of them that showed her battered up. Did book say what happened to the murder weapon?

In the documentary one of their childhood friends said Cowlings love for OJ was beyond friendship, that he would do anything for the man. As a high school student he stepped between someone with a gun and OJ when they were playing a joke on them. I'm sure he loved nicole, but his love for OJ was more. He's the first guy I thought of when I read the excerpt from the book about an accomplice, and who would be so loyal to OJ as to help in a murder.
 

Guess Who

New member
Jul 26, 2005
20,792
3,245
0
In the documentary one of their childhood friends said Cowlings love for OJ was beyond friendship, that he would do anything for the man. As a high school student he stepped between someone with a gun and OJ when they were playing a joke on them. I'm sure he loved nicole, but his love for OJ was more. He's the first guy I thought of when I read the excerpt from the book about an accomplice, and who would be so loyal to OJ as to help in a murder.
True that AC was loyal and never broke ranks from OJ like "Ship" did for good reason.
 

Mojocat_rivals48469

New member
Jan 29, 2003
18,120
3,074
0
Finally got to watch episode 5 last night. I'm surprised more isn't being made out of his agents interview. He says Oj told Al Cowlings that he did go to Nicole's the night of the murder, but didn't do it. And when the agent asked, he says Oj told him that she would still be alive if she didn't answer the door with a knife in her hands.
Yeah, saw that just last night. Interesting - the idea that OJ was there but someone else - AC - did the killing. But it doesn't comport with the evidence.
 

MrLair

New member
Jan 26, 2005
6,933
2,607
0
Just out of curious, anyone that is African american really believe he is innocence today? And if you didn't watch please don't reply.
 

catillac32

New member
Jan 24, 2006
4,656
16
0
There's no way anyone could have left that horrific crime scene without leaving footprints. OJ's were the only prints at or around the scene. His book was nothing but a failed attempt to make money. I'm sure there's another book coming when he's released from prison.
At the same time, there's almost no way that OJ could have killed Ron and Nicole without transferring more blood to the Bronco.
 

catillac32

New member
Jan 24, 2006
4,656
16
0
Maybe so, it just seemed curious that in the book he claimed the accomplice took his clothes.
Jason Simpson would have been a very viable accomplice, as William Dear stated in his book. Nicole had also stood up Jason for dinner that night at the restaurant that Jason was a chef at. Jason was an emotionally disturbed person who has access to a lot of knives.
 

Violent Cuts

New member
Jun 22, 2001
26,917
1,192
0
At the same time, there's almost no way that OJ could have killed Ron and Nicole without transferring more blood to the Bronco.

What are you basing this on? There was no evidence to suggest this.

And considering this is exactly what happened, you're incorrect.
 

EdHochuli'sTriceps

New member
Nov 13, 2004
368
142
0
hesitate to mention this with some of the hooded posters here, but the scene of oj in a black church, at the pulpit, as a woman sings "oooOOOOooooo jaaaaAAAAAAY" was not a a great look for my people
 

krazykats

New member
Nov 6, 2006
23,768
2,330
0
Only because he was too good for your people until they were ready to riot over his *** then he loved your people.

It's a shame really, and maybe whites wouldn't have loved him as they did if he wasn't damn near white himself but so what! We are all different so be true to what/who you are. If it pisses people off screw them!