Maybe it's just me, but recruiting rankings don't really do it for me when a team looks poorly coached and there is almost zero player development happening. I know the recruiting rankings (which are good, not great) were exciting for the first couple years, but I'm struggling to understand how those rankings (which still place us almost dead last in the SEC) are giving some of you so much excitement about this staff's ability to win games.
At the end of the day, even with 5 more years of Stoops recruiting we're going to be less talented than Florida, Georgia, Tennessee and South Carolina. With that being the case, are we going to beat those teams with superior coaching from Stoops and Co? Where is the optimism coming from? At least with Brooks we could out-coach other teams at times and develop under the radar talent. With Stoops we have virtually zero chance of climbing the ladder because he struggles not only to hire a competent coaching staff but he struggles to make competent in game decisions. He struggles not to let his emotions override his thinking. He struggles to develop the talent he has. He struggles to make in game adjustments, with his teams routinely getting out-performed in the second half of games. He even struggles to beat the few teams on the schedule where he does have a talent/depth advantage, blatantly showing which team has the superior coaching staff.
Are you really going to tie your support to him based on so-so recruiting rankings? Come on. Are we just throwing logic out the window at this point or have we just said oh well, let's go all in on drinking the blue Kool Aid? I know we have some really supportive fans, but I think some of you are confusing being supportive with being an enabler that supports a coaching staff like Joker, Stoops, Gillispie, etc., simply because they're the coach of "our team".
What most fans don't seem to realize is what a deep hole the UK Athletic Dept headed by mitch dug us into with TEN YEARS (decades with other losers in charge) of minimum support (ridiculous, really) that allowed recruits that were told that UK was not just a basketball school to be brought in and be exposed to the "recruiting room". which immediately made a liar out of all our coaches. Along with the other subpar facilities and jokes for a football operating budget and recruiting budget.
Repeating myself, but it needs to be repeated, Brooks and Joker never had a chance in the SEC.
Joker's first team in 2010 had its senior class (with very few decent redshirts, they had to play if they were any good) a group from 07 (after only our fourth SEC break even season since the SEVENTIES) that had NINETEEN two stars (only one a 5.4, Lendl, that had to quit) that averaged a LOFTY (LOL) 5.1 plus on Rival's recruiting Richter Scale. The team had TWO JC four stars playing, and when they played Florida that year Florida AVERAGED higher than a 5.9 (Higher than Boom's rating, for FORTY FOUR players) for their TWO DEEP on both offense and defense-------while UK started more two stars than three stars AND two walkons. Florida aided the seven SEC opponents that year (excluding Vandy but including the two Misses) to AVERAGE 38 four star commits over the past four years.
Right, coaching can make up that kind of difference, talent doesn't matter that much.
But that gap is closing, talent PLUS experience hasn't that much yet, but we should expect a couple of games a year where the players (and coaches) exceed their talent level, after all a truly incompetent coach according to most posters (Joker) upset top ten USC (with a HOF coach) and lost to Cam and the NC by only 39-36.
And in a couple more years the talent level won't be such a tremendous mismatch, and we will have a lot of senior leaders. If we can manage to win a few more games this staff will be able to show people what kind of recruiters they really are, they have already shown me that they are great.
And TALENT with experience is still UK's greatest problem.
By for now.