Ok, we know ul will score big on us but....

Dallas-Wild

Heisman
Feb 1, 2005
20,859
31,141
112
Technically it is never over until it is over.
Technically that is true.

We will have to play a perfect game to keep it close, and to have any chance to be in the game at the end.

Is it possible? Yea, but we have seen so many times how we beat ourselves.

Hope on that day it changes, but we know our history.

I will be wearing my blue and cheering my *** off, and I will wake up that day thinking ...HEY we might do this!

Win or lose I am a BBN UK Wildcat fan till the day the Lord calls me home!
 

BMo643

Senior
Sep 4, 2016
537
793
92
I would hope/assume that UL doesn't come out sleepwalking/sloppy like they did against Duke/UVA and Wake but you never know. To me it seems like if that first drive doesn't go as planned the team mopes and then that gives the defense confidence. UL has looked like they could beat Bama at times and almost lost to Virginia and allowed Wake to hang for 3 quarters so a UK win isn't impossible especially with UKs running game.

Key to UK staying in the game will be getting positive yards on 1st and 2nd down and keeping the 3rd down yardage at 4 or less. Putting Johnson in an obvious passing situation would fall right in to the ULs hands.

Rushing yards allowed vs Power 5 teams.
Cuse - 121 Season avg - 117
FSU - 171 Season avg - 189
Clemson - 201 Season avg - 156
Duke - 110 Season avg - 174
NC State - 14 Season avg - 151
Virginia - 84 Season avg - 107
Boston College - 57 Season avg - 151
Wake - 73 Season avg - 155

Avg - 104 ypg but they've not really face a great rushing attack all year either aside from Clemson and FSU.

The defense seems to be getting better against the run as the season goes on. But they've also not face any "great" running teams aside from FSU and Clemson and UK would be the best rushing they've faced all season from a statistical standpoint. So like always the game will be won in the trenches...if UKs oline opens up holes for UKs dynamic RBs then UK will move the ball. It will be up to the UK defense to slow down Lamar...who is coming off his statistical worse game of the year against Wake where he only accumulated 298 total yards and only 1 TD.

It will also come down to holding onto the ball...UK sits at 127th and UL sits at 128th out of 128 D1 teams in fumbles lost and actually UK and UL sit tied at 123rd at total turnovers lost both losing an insane 24 turnovers in 10 games. So turnovers will loom large and could keep UK in the game.
 

CardHack

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
120,002
4,975
113
How good is Louisville's defense? I have been trying to quantify that for months.

* It's good enough to be 2nd in the nation behind Alabama in yards per carry allowing only 2.8 ypc.

* It's good enough to only allow three rushing touchdowns on the season (one against Marshall, one against Syracuse and one to Wayne Galliman against Clemson). Louisville has gone five games without allowing a rushing touchdown.

* It's good enough to only allow 28+% on third down.

but...I have pressed my mind to try to remember a single mobile QB (maybe Dungey at Syracuse, but that's not really their game) and the running backs have been sort of serviceable; the UVA running back Mizell was a good all purpose back and obviously we made Dalvin Cook our focus in limiting him successfully against FSU and I think FSU's rushing yardage total is really deceiving because the bulk of it came when the score was 63-10 (from Jacque Patrick), the running back for NC State was supposed to be pretty good but was negated. Otherwise the running games faced have been pretty average. Even in the UVA and Duke games the problems for Louisville weren't running games, they were turnovers coupled with secondary breakdowns and it's secondary breakdowns that have been a recurring theme. It's what lost the Clemson game and it's what kept Duke and UVA closer than it should have been.

On a personnel level we have talent and no real weak links; but we are vulnerable to the Playoff and New Year's Day caliber teams because I think we're a little thin by comparison in numbers in the front seven. I was listening to color man Alex Kupper this morning and he thinks Deangelo Brown is the best NT in college football; it's hard to argue to the contrary for me because I can't think of a better one (because in part there are still more teams playing 4 man fronts than 3-4s). Fields returned Saturday and was a monster but to that point Louisville's pass rush had largely gone AWOL since the Marshall game with the exception of the NC State game. Hearns is a very good DE. The linebackers Thomas and Kelsey are outstanding as a tandem. I think we're a little vulnerable in the Red Zone because teams pick on Trumaine Washington to mixed results. When healthy Wiggins starts over him but hasn't been since FSU.

I guess the statistical jury would say one thing, but my observations say something else. Maybe it's a matter of your weaknesses in the Red Zone due to a lack of quality passing lining up with our weakness of being able to cover routes when teams are forced to the air. So many of our scores given up in the Red Zone through the air are on third down which is even odder given our quality third down percentage defensively.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wsel2672