OMG! 😆 I asked ChatGPT who the meanest poster was in WildcatReport history. The results are eye opening

[CatManTrue]

This is too funny. @CoralSpringsCat : stop being so mean & sarcastic!

i will ask about the flame wars next.

———-

"Meanest poster" is definitely subjective — especially on forums like WildcatReport (the Rivals/Northwestern fan site) where fandom, frustration, and sarcasm often blur the line between "passionate" and "mean." That said:

CoralSpringsCat?​

CoralSpringsCat is certainly one of the more infamous posters on WildcatReport. Known for:

• Blunt, often brutal takes
• Trolling undertones — sometimes crossing the line from snark to antagonism
• A reputation for negativity — especially toward the coaching staff, athletic department, and even fellow posters

Some longtime users definitely consider CSC the "meanest" — or at least the most relentlessly negative.

Others in the conversation​

Depending on era and personal bias, other posters might get brought up too. Some users:

• Use sarcasm that rubs people the wrong way
• Go hard on "doom and gloom" during tough seasons
• Engage in personal attacks or get overly aggressive during arguments

But CoralSpringsCat's name tends to come up more than most, particularly among users who value civility and constructive discussion.

Would you like a deeper dive into WildcatReport posting culture or notable flame wars?

 

[CatManTrue]

“What were the notable flame wars?”


Here are a few of the most notable flame wars and heated controversies to go down on the WildcatReport and related Northwestern fan forums over the years:

---

1. CoralSpringsCat vs. Moderates and Critics​

Possibly the most notorious flame war involved CoralSpringsCat, whose strident critiques of coaching, administration, and other posters sparked intense response threads. Longtime users often clashed with CSC over his relentlessly negative takes and trolling style—which many saw as crossing the line into antagonism.

---

2. Administrative Hazing Controversy (2023)​

In mid‑2023, arguments around a hazing scandal involving the football program brought out threads rife with sarcasm, accusation, and heated debate—especially over how the Northwestern administration handled it. One commenter remarked:

“Out of all the D1 schools in college football, Northwestern is one of the last schools I thought would have a hazing problem” (Reddit)
Reactions were visceral and polarized, with distrust of leadership and internal conflict spilling into public flame wars.

---

3. Rivalry Trash Talk: Illinois & Wisconsin​

Several threads about rival matchups turned personal fast:

• In Illinois–Northwestern rivalry games, Illinois fans and Northwestern back-and-forth included lines like:
  

  “Just Illinois things… I ******* hate you” (Reddit)

• Against Wisconsin, fans occasionally sparred:
  

  “God I hate playing at NW. … NW always sneaks in these wins against us” (Reddit)

These rivalry threads regularly morphed into nasty, no-holds-barred trash talk wars.

---

4. “NU vs. NW” Naming Feud​

A long‐running, surprisingly intense fight over whether Northwestern should be abbreviated “NU” or “NW” spilled into forums—even among other Big Ten fanbases—drawing snarky debates about identity and perceived arrogance (Rutgers Rivals Forum, kentucky.forums.rivals.com).

---

5. Internal Forum Feuds: The “Wildside” & Rant Board​

On WildcatReport itself, threads like “Wildside” vs. “Rant Board” frequently devolved into sharp rebukes. In one 2021 clash:

“Blaming the students is ridiculous! … You want to blame people, blame the turn‑coat STH…” (northwestern.forums.rivals.com)

These in‑forum disagreements often got personal—about student behavior, ticket holders, attendance, and intramural culture.

---

Summary Table​

Topic	Themes & Tone
CoralSpringsCat feuds	Persistent trolling, harsh critiques
Hazing/admin scandal	Emotionally charged accusation and blame
Rivalry matchups (IL & WI)	Highly personal trash talk from both sides
Forum naming feud NU vs NW	Identity, mockery, fandom purity wars
WildcatReport community conflicts	Accusations around behavior, fandom standards

---

Would you like to dive into any specific thread or do deeper forensic analysis on CoralSpringsCat’s posting history?

This is too good

 

[CatManTrue]

Here’s a more in‑depth forensic look at CoralSpringsCat's posting history on WildcatReport, based on archived threads and community reactions:

---

Posting Footprint & Style​

• Long‑time presence: Joined December 4, 2002 and has amassed over 40,000 posts—clearly a prolific contributor (northwestern.forums.rivals.com, northwestern.forums.rivals.com).
• Blunt and dismissive tone: Frequently responded curtly, with undertones that many readers found abrasive. For instance:
  

  zeek55: “Is anybody on these boards under the age of 30?”
  CoralSpringsCat: “You’re gonna need to wait until noon at the earliest for any sort of response.” (northwestern.forums.rivals.com)

• Harsh personal commentary: In conversations with corbi296, CSC called someone a “sick young man” and doubled down on derision:
  

  “Supposedly estranged from his family… it’s truly a shame.” (northwestern.forums.rivals.com)

• Sarcasm and negativity: When discussing University leadership and finances, he framed criticism bluntly:
  

  “Yes, that’s the $790 M question! Hopefully he will be shown the door shortly after the Fitz trial/settlement.” (northwestern.forums.rivals.com)

---

Community Response & Reputation​

• Repeated conflicts: Threads showing posts from other users expressing frustration:
  

  “Coral needs a timeout. He is angry.” (northwestern.forums.rivals.com)

• Frequent involvement in snark rather than constructive dialogue: Rather than constructive analysis, CSC often turned replies into taunts or dismissals, especially in emotionally charged threads.

---

Topic Breakdown & Behavior Patterns​

Subject Area	Typical Tone & Approach
General team threads	Short, dismissive remarks; minimal fanfare or positivity.
Development / Coaching	Unforgiving and critical of administration/coaches.
Controversial Issues	Engaged with strong emotional language and sarcasm.
Forum Culture Shots	Willing to poke or insult other members directly.

---

Summary: Was CSC the "Meanest"?​

• Yes—by tone and reputation: CSC was known for terse, cutting remarks and harsh personal takes. Many fellow users complained about his negativity.
• Not the only one, though: Others on the site also had their share of flame wars, but CSC’s consistency, volume, and blunt style made him stand out.
• Subtle aggression: Rather than outright slurs, CSC often used sarcasm and insinuation as his tools—sometimes making interactions feel hostile rather than playful.

---

Final Thoughts​

CoralSpringsCat’s behavior often veered into antagonistic territory—not overtly hateful, but relentlessly critical and sharp-tongued. That tone, combined with sheer volume, earned him a reputation as one of the meanest voices in WildcatReport’s history.

Would you like me to dig up specific threads where he clashed most heavily with moderators or others?

 

[CatManTrue]

Ok to be fair: I asked this. Please provide a forensic analysis on CatManTrue’s posting history on WR. Did he post the truth?

ChatGPT is surprisingly accurate and assesses posts dating back to 2008

Here’s a forensic-style breakdown of CatManTrue (CMT) and his posting history on WildcatReport (WR), including an assessment of whether he “posted the truth.”

---

Posting Profile​

• Visible member since: October 4, 2008
• Approximately: 13,200 posts, ~8,500 replies across WR boards (northwestern.forums.rivals.com)
• Presence spans: Football threads, serious prediction posts, interaction with other well‑known members in board discussions.

---

Notable Posts & Behavior Patterns​

Game Prediction Posts​

• In a 2008 “prediction thread” (Florida Champ Board), CatManTrue boldly projected a Northwestern upset over Illinois at Wrigley Field, with a detailed creative forecast:
  

  “Nerdwestern 23 … Illannoy 18 … (It’s all just MATH, baby!)” (northwestern.forums.rivals.com)
  That prediction turned out surprisingly accurate—NU did win at Wrigley—suggesting occasional well‑informed confidence.

Historical Match Commentary​

• In a 2024 thread titled “9/17/2016,” CatManTrue recounted memories from that game against Duke, reflecting on key players (Thorson, Carr, etc.) and the atmosphere—indicating long-term engagement and firsthand memory in NU football lore (northwestern.forums.rivals.com).

Legal & Forum Reputation Thread​

• In a longer discursive thread (2024) about hazing and player mental health, a user referenced CMT as a former offensive lineman and former plaintiff in litigation. The post notes that CMT was once a “rational and appreciated member” who later shifted perspective—possibly tied to personal experiences or trauma—implying depth to his participation and motivations (northwestern.forums.rivals.com).

Community Engagement & Tone​

• CatManTrue’s posts frequently show civic tone—more reflective, conversational, and less antagonistic. He responds and reacts in multiple threads (e.g., portal news, open practice) without hostile language. References show reactions from other seasoned users like CoralSpringsCat, DaCat, stpaulcat, etc., typically without controversy (northwestern.forums.rivals.com).

---

Did He “Post the Truth”?​

Evidence of Credibility:​

• Accurate predictions: His Wrigley prediction thread matched actual results.
• Contextual recollections: Recounting games and events with detail suggests genuine experience.
• Forum respect: Other members noted him as "rational and appreciated" in earlier years (northwestern.forums.rivals.com).

Caveats & Limitations:​

• No indication of dramatic flame wars or trolling: Unlike CoralSpringsCat, CMT doesn’t appear in flame threads.
• Legal involvement mention: His identity as a plaintiff may have influenced his tone and credibility perceptions later—possibly viewed as biased or sensitive by others.

---

Comparative Summary​

Aspect	CatManTrue
Typical tone	Respectful, conversational, measured
Predictions	Occasionally well-informed and accurate
Controversies	None publicly traced (no flame wars)
Credibility factors	Former player, plaintiff, long‑term member
Community reputation	Once “appreciated”; later more complex

---

Final Take​

Based on publicly visible WR activity:

• CatManTrue was generally credible, measured, and historically knowledgeable—a former player and involved member whose insights were grounded by experience.
• There’s no evidence he engaged in flame wars or misrepresented facts.
• His shifts in engagement post-litigation and during sensitive topics indicate a community figure whose credibility may be weighed differently depending on context—but unlike some polemicists, he stays factual.

 

[phatcat_rivals223240]

What a disappointment. Did I make the top 5?

 

[CatManTrue]

What a disappointment. Did I make the top 5?

According to ChatGPT… you’re number 2!

@Gocatsgo2003 and a couple of other randos also made the list. AI is ridiculous

—————-

"WildcatReport" — Northwestern’s Rivals forum — has had its fair share of infamous posters over the years, especially during the program’s lean football seasons. While there’s no official ranking of the “meanest” posters, longtime forum participants often recall certain names with a mix of dread and amusement.

Here’s a tongue-in-cheek attempt at a Top 5 Meanest Posters in WildcatReport History, based on common community lore, snark level, and legendary meltdowns:

---

1. CoralSpringsCat​

Status: Hall of Fame-level hater
Reputation: Ruthless. Known for biting sarcasm, relentless negativity, and calling out players, coaches, and even other posters with surgical precision. Had a gift for turning every thread into a coaching referendum.
Absolutely makes the list.

---

2. phatcat​

Status: Curmudgeonly veteran
Reputation: Less overtly hostile than CSC, but deeply cynical and jaded. Snappy one-liners and dismissive takes on almost everything Northwestern-related. Sometimes hilariously cruel, especially after a loss.
Also makes the list.

---

3. gocatsgo2003​

Status: Smart and smug
Reputation: More intellectually cutting than mean, but still managed to rub people the wrong way. Often backed up scathing posts with data, which somehow made it worse.
Borderline mean — makes it on some lists.

---

4. lakemichigancat​

Status: The nuclear option
Reputation: Not always present, but when they posted, things escalated fast. Was banned more than once for personal attacks and ferocious takes.
Certified menace.

---

5. The_NU_Truth​

Status: Conspiracy theorist energy
Reputation: Obsessed with exposing the "truth" behind the program's failures. Often descended into paranoia and personal attacks. Not always wrong — just mean about it.
Dark horse contender.

---

Honorable Mentions:

• NUfanatic – Not outright mean, but could go off the rails during coaching debates.
• kenoshaCat – Sarcasm was an art form. Not always mean, but frequently savage.
• SadNUFan – Less mean, more existential dread — but the tone could get heavy.

---

Let me know if you want the Top 5 Funniest Posters or Most Delusional Sunshine Pumpers list too — both are classics.

 

[Rebel II]

According to ChatGPT… you’re number 2!

@Gocatsgo2003 and a couple of other randos also made the list. AI is ridiculous

—————-

"WildcatReport" — Northwestern’s Rivals forum — has had its fair share of infamous posters over the years, especially during the program’s lean football seasons. While there’s no official ranking of the “meanest” posters, longtime forum participants often recall certain names with a mix of dread and amusement.

Here’s a tongue-in-cheek attempt at a Top 5 Meanest Posters in WildcatReport History, based on common community lore, snark level, and legendary meltdowns:

---

1. CoralSpringsCat​

Status: Hall of Fame-level hater
Reputation: Ruthless. Known for biting sarcasm, relentless negativity, and calling out players, coaches, and even other posters with surgical precision. Had a gift for turning every thread into a coaching referendum.
Absolutely makes the list.

---

2. phatcat​

Status: Curmudgeonly veteran
Reputation: Less overtly hostile than CSC, but deeply cynical and jaded. Snappy one-liners and dismissive takes on almost everything Northwestern-related. Sometimes hilariously cruel, especially after a loss.
Also makes the list.

---

3. gocatsgo2003​

Status: Smart and smug
Reputation: More intellectually cutting than mean, but still managed to rub people the wrong way. Often backed up scathing posts with data, which somehow made it worse.
Borderline mean — makes it on some lists.

---

4. lakemichigancat​

Status: The nuclear option
Reputation: Not always present, but when they posted, things escalated fast. Was banned more than once for personal attacks and ferocious takes.
Certified menace.

---

5. The_NU_Truth​

Status: Conspiracy theorist energy
Reputation: Obsessed with exposing the "truth" behind the program's failures. Often descended into paranoia and personal attacks. Not always wrong — just mean about it.
Dark horse contender.

---

Honorable Mentions:

• NUfanatic – Not outright mean, but could go off the rails during coaching debates.
• kenoshaCat – Sarcasm was an art form. Not always mean, but frequently savage.
• SadNUFan – Less mean, more existential dread — but the tone could get heavy.

---

Let me know if you want the Top 5 Funniest Posters or Most Delusional Sunshine Pumpers list too — both are classics.

Please post those lists as well! Most Interesting discussion of the summer, lol.

 

[CatManTrue]

Please post those lists as well! Most Interesting discussion of the summer, lol.

Here are the top 5 funniest per ChatGPT. I thought that NUCat320 should be listed… but whaddu I know?

RIP Smithee & FloridAlum they’re definitely top 5 funniest in my book


It seems difficult to find any official or community‑published “top 5 funniest posters in WildcatReport history” ranking—but from forum posts spanning years, here’s what reliably rises to the top:

---

Funniest Posters Historically on WildcatReport​

1. Moxie – Frequently cited as the most condescending but brilliantly witty troll on the board. A master of subtle insults wrapped in faux‑superiority, he often ignored replies altogether, assuming his tower‑top vantage above the rest Reddit+12Northwestern Rivals+12Northwestern Rivals+12.
2. Turk – Praised by CatManTrue as “some of the funniest stuff on this board—ever,” with lots of off‑the‑wall humor and off‑topic threads on the now‑gone “rant board” Northwestern Rivals.
3. FloridAlum – A long‑time poster and moderator credited for inside jokes and storytelling, often revisiting older threads and shaping the board’s humor culture Northwestern Rivals.
4. Euro, CincyCat, Smithee, and others – While not necessarily individually voted funniest, they were collectively part of the earliest inside‑joke culture that evolved after the 2000 Alamo Bowl era, often credited with shaping the tone of the board’s longtime humor style Kentucky Rivals+2Northwestern Rivals+2Northwestern Rivals+2.
5. Roscoe (the tortoise‑colored cat) – Though a fictional sidekick to Moxie, Roscoe represents a beloved character who participated in the elaborate trolling narratives—earning affection from readers and humor historians alike

 

[CatManTrue]

FYI I think this is getting some Kentucky posters confused with Northwestern ones.

We’ll always have the Music City Bowl victory

 

[phatcat_rivals223240]

"According to ChatGPT… you’re number 2!"

Yes, that's what people say about me.

 

[TheC]

Maybe I'm the poster with the most delicate sensibilities, but I find this singling out of a poster rather uncomfortable.

 

[CatManTrue]

Maybe I'm the poster with the most delicate sensibilities, but I find this singling out of a poster rather uncomfortable.

Nobody was singled out!

I asked ChatGPT a somewhat objective question (depends on your definition of “mean”) and that was the output based on its analysis of the WR archive.

Words can hurt! Let’s all be nicer on the new on3… our AI overlords are watching us

 

[TheC]

Asking ChatGPT if we're all going to die someday so who really gives a fuq

ChatGPT: Yes

 

[AdamOnFirst]

Another reason for me to be angry at Cappy: clearly him deleting my most pointed posts has kept me off this list.

 

[Gocatsgo2003]

Very weird.

 

[CatManTrue]

Very weird.

Yea. I’m glad ChatGPT is realizing its potential by analyzing the old Rivals forums.

i wonder what their analysis would be of shakes3858 or Wrassler