I think I've got evidence that challenges the confidence we have in the 8A rankings. It's not a new thought to say that rankings are deceptive, but I put these scores out there just to question confidence in current 8A thinking:
Loyola 44 MS 43
NT 27 MS 21
NT 14 York 10
HC 35 York 7
GW 42 York 7
OP 34 York 17
I'm not suggesting by these scores alone that confidence in the rankings should be rethought. Nor am I trying to focus only on wss teams compared to Loyola/NT/MS. I'm just curious as to what explanations can save the current rankings and these scores. Maybe it's because NT and York played week 1, when most teams aren't firing on all cylinders. I'm not sure, but would like to hear any thoughts on this.
Loyola 44 MS 43
NT 27 MS 21
NT 14 York 10
HC 35 York 7
GW 42 York 7
OP 34 York 17
I'm not suggesting by these scores alone that confidence in the rankings should be rethought. Nor am I trying to focus only on wss teams compared to Loyola/NT/MS. I'm just curious as to what explanations can save the current rankings and these scores. Maybe it's because NT and York played week 1, when most teams aren't firing on all cylinders. I'm not sure, but would like to hear any thoughts on this.