Oregon Week. Why do we win?

Headlock

Senior
Dec 28, 2023
397
699
93
Because the PSU players are absolutely committed to prove that they are winners. They were so close last year. They love their team and coaches and are determined to win. Oregon is merely a step on the ladder to the top.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LionJim

leinbacker

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
2,404
3,836
113
Because the PSU players are absolutely committed to prove that they are winners. They were so close last year. They love their team and coaches and are determined to win. Oregon is merely a step on the ladder to the top.

I hope you are right. Last year the players (and a coach that doesn't understand discipline) gave Oregon the early lead with penalties.
 

TheWizardofCamelot

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2015
990
1,291
93
Based on what’s “on tape” I’d lean towards Oregon winning this one.

But I can’t tell if PSU put who they really are “on tape” yet or it was truly just some garbage preseason approach.
 

WaffleShopper

Senior
Sep 20, 2023
425
794
93
Have you witnessed anything during the first 3 games to suggest that this year is different?

I haven’t.

1) dumb / unnecessary offsides penalties by the DE’s

2) false starts

3) really poor tackling
I actually disagree with all 3 of those. I have noticed a definite improvement in tackling from last year, and as DeLuca gets less playing time our tackling should continue to improve. I also think we’ve been better with penalties as well. So far this year we are:

T11th fewest penalties per game
T7th fewest penalty yards per game

Both of those are much better than previous years. We’ll see if things change starting this week.
 

NittPicker

Heisman
Jun 30, 2001
5,729
11,848
113
The combined record of Oregon's FBS opponents is 2-8. They also blew out FCS Montana State. The Ducks certainly have some talented players but their three OOC opponents were weak. I know Okie State looked good on paper but they've been garbage this year. If someone wants to slam Penn State for their SOS thus far, they'll need to do the same for Oregon. So why do we win?? The home crowd will tip the scales. And I think Allar will put up much bigger numbers than many expect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LilWashLion

DaytonRickster

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
2,342
2,774
113
Based on what’s “on tape” I’d lean towards Oregon winning this one.

But I can’t tell if PSU put who they really are “on tape” yet or it was truly just some garbage preseason approach.
PSU's OOC play makes me nervous about this game. Is there another version of the PSU offense that can consistently execute, move the chains, and has QB play improved enough to beat Oregon?
I think the 1st team defense can help win games. Still concerned about reliable LBer & DL depth.
 

PSUFTG

All-Conference
Nov 1, 2021
2,077
3,285
113
Three key items (and a wildcard), IMO

Oregon does not play good defense against the run - didn't last year, have not this year thus far (given their level of competition).
Last year, PSU's line and RBs absolutely manhandled them. Truly, it was impressive. Can PSU do that again? What we saw PSU run game most of last year, and in the scrimmages thus far this year, would say "no", but you never know and they did it last year.

Last year, Oregon absolutely shredded PSU's D - curb stomped them. PSU was completely lost and outplayed by Oregon's offense. PSU was lucky that there were so many long drives, by both teams (leading to relatively few possessions in the game) which was the only thing that kept Oregon from hanging 1/2 a hundred or more on them.
What has changed there? Well - Tom Allen is gone, and that should/could more than make up for PSU's loss of Abdul Carter (I think it will. Allen was that bad)

Gabriel was really good. Moore looks like he can be even better - but he has not yet been tested. Will the inexperienced kid rise to the occasion, or spit the bit? You never know till you know.

The wildcard? Travelling cross country has been hell on the visitors in the Big Ten (either east to west or west to east). Oregon having to travel to PA? Should be worth at least 3-4 points, IMO Playing in Beaver Stadium in a night white-out, with an inexperienced QB - should be worth another 3-4 points, IMO. That's a lot to overcome against a quality team.
I think that gives PSU the edge.
 

johnmpsu

Senior
Nov 29, 2001
282
478
63
Have an imaginative running game and then...
Run the ball. Run the ball. Run the ball.
 

rudedude

Heisman
Sep 28, 2002
7,957
15,661
113
Three key items (and a wildcard), IMO

Oregon does not play good defense against the run - didn't last year, have not this year thus far (given their level of competition).
Last year, PSU's line and RBs absolutely manhandled them. Truly, it was impressive. Can PSU do that again? What we saw PSU run game most of last year, and in the scrimmages thus far this year, would say "no", but you never know and they did it last year.

Last year, Oregon absolutely shredded PSU's D - curb stomped them. PSU was completely lost and outplayed by Oregon's offense. PSU was lucky that there were so many long drives, by both teams (leading to relatively few possessions in the game) which was the only thing that kept Oregon from hanging 1/2 a hundred or more on them.
What has changed there? Well - Tom Allen is gone, and that should/could more than make up for PSU's loss of Abdul Carter (I think it will. Allen was that bad)

Gabriel was really good. Moore looks like he can be even better - but he has not yet been tested. Will the inexperienced kid rise to the occasion, or spit the bit? You never know till you know.

The wildcard? Travelling cross country has been hell on the visitors in the Big Ten (either east to west or west to east). Oregon having to travel to PA? Should be worth at least 3-4 points, IMO Playing in Beaver Stadium in a night white-out, with an inexperienced QB - should be worth another 3-4 points, IMO. That's a lot to overcome against a quality team.
I think that gives PSU the edge.
Curbed stomped, eh? Gee, I was at that game and last I remember, we out gained them and due to an unfortunate interception, lost by 8, 45-37. 🤔🤔🤔
 

leinbacker

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
2,404
3,836
113
Have you witnessed anything during the first 3 games to suggest that this year is different?

I haven’t.

1) dumb / unnecessary offsides penalties by the DE’s

2) false starts

3) really poor tackling

No, but lets have something more than games that are glorified scrimmages. This could be Jim Knowles' impact too. The defense looks improved... And Clemson's looks worst, hmm
 

TheBigUglies

All-Conference
Oct 26, 2021
1,279
2,046
113
PSU defense keeps them in the game and possibly scores points off turnovers because offense will sputter. However, if Oregon's run defense is weak then the running game will help PSU win because defense will give them short field to work with. Also, home field advantage with White Out. Lastly, Oregon having to make the cross country trip.
 

razpsu

Heisman
Jan 13, 2004
13,498
13,297
113
We keep it close with the lead in the first half then in the 3rd oline and running backs start taking over. We did it vs their good team last year. Why wouldn’t we do it vs their new starters this year. They only return 5 total starters from last year!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nits74

ApexLion

All-American
Nov 1, 2021
5,504
9,334
113
I say because it’s Whiteout time.
Beacause Angry James and staff showed up immediately after the last game. You know what you do when you have talent? You beat on them till they are chewing copper and spitting pennies. The time for we love you is over. Hopefully, that's the vibe the last two weeks. Some long-time coach who won plenty of big games taught me that.
 

djmccaslin

Sophomore
Nov 30, 2016
108
149
43
I heard a lot through the first 3 games about they were holding back playbook. Not wanting to put anything on film, etc. I can recall this being said over and over. throughout the years (regardless of the coaching staff) when first few games, prior to a P4 opponent and there were clear concerns with the offense and/or defense. Can anyone actually point to an example where PSU was kinda middling/inconsistent won the opening game(s) and then really opened up the playbook like we are all expecting this week?

The only example I could come up with was 2002 with Nebraska but that was only one game (UCF) before Nebraska and a bye between UCF and Nebraska. It also was a completely different coaching staff.

My point is sure, we may see a few weird formations that create confusion or a timeout from Oregon but that what we saw in the first 3 games may be what we have until they sort out their issues (if they can) and Saturday may be messy--mistakes from both sides and struggles from the Singleton and Allar like we've seen in the first 3 games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Psu00 and Ram20

TheWizardofCamelot

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2015
990
1,291
93
Curbed stomped, eh? Gee, I was at that game and last I remember, we out gained them and due to an unfortunate interception, lost by 8, 45-37. 🤔🤔🤔
I tend to agree with this sentiment. Their offense did whatever they wanted against our defense. But I came away from that game thinking we were the better team if it were not for the TOs and penalties. Less disciplined team? Yep, I think we were the less disciplined team.

Another big factor, IMO, this game will be played on grass NOT turf.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nits74 and rudedude

troutrus

All-Conference
Oct 7, 2021
813
1,091
93
Because defense wins big games and we have what it takes.
Our guys on both sides will welcome the challenge of playing a decent opponent.
The cream rises to the top when talented players are tested.
At least I hope so. 🤞