Kevin Ollie was fired “for cause” and UConn tried to deny his buyout. The court ruled for Ollie. There have been suggestions that UofL shouldn’t have paid Petrino. This would refute that notion.
I’m not familiar with UConn’s situation, but you can’t just walk away from a million dollar obligation. We should have tried to negotiate a reduced settlement with Petrino, not just decide an all-or-nothing outcome.@zipp thoughts?
It absolutely was a gift. Kevin Ollie just proved that again. Pitino had no serious charges leveled against him, and was fired early and without due process anyway. His decision saved U of L millions...Again, Pitino walked away from his lawsuit against us because he wasn't going to win.
It was no gift.
NCAA said Pitino had no complicity in either situation. Plausible deniability is not an issue unless the failure to know is by design. Pitino’s wasn’t. He was purposely being excluded by adidas operatives.Except for lack of institutional control in strippergate case and conspiring with Adidas to pay a player $100K, Pitino had no serious charges against him.
Pitino walked away from that case because he was guilty of all of that, and he feared what damage it would cause to his future NCAA coaching prospects to have all of his actions drug out into a court of law and examined closely.
Again, Pitino walked away from his lawsuit against us because he wasn't going to win.
It was no gift.