OT: “For Cause” Contract Buyout

zipp_rivals

Heisman
Jun 26, 2001
92,957
11,953
0
I’m not familiar with UConn’s situation, but you can’t just walk away from a million dollar obligation. We should have tried to negotiate a reduced settlement with Petrino, not just decide an all-or-nothing outcome.

And U of L tried it BOTH ways: Petrino got 100% and Pitino got 0%. It’s why I continue to maintain that Pitino gave U of L one helluva gift walking away from his lawsuit.

As I understand, BTW, the Master got a huge ovation at the arena this afternoon…
 

2330859

All-American
Nov 28, 2002
12,145
9,804
0
Zipp ….. good observation, and it was a very interesting one. If one is confined to listening to the media, it would appear the majority of this UL community hated Pitino and blamed him and Jurich for McGee’s behavior.

Not so sure about what the majority of Jefferson Co thinks about those events, but I believe the vast majority of UL fans who were responsible for supporting this Basketball Program for the decades leading up to this decline, did not want either Jurich or Pitino to leave UL, and I suspect that most would embrace both returning back, to repair the damage that Postel, Schnatter and Grissom initiated.

Kansas, LSU, Auburn and other Universities under NCAA investigation are demonstrating their ability to self determine their own future, and immune to those who have their own agenda. Auburn had no compunction when they turned a deaf ear to those in the media who argued against hiring Bruce Pearl.
 

ulcards1

Senior
Aug 1, 2002
2,275
814
113
Again, Pitino walked away from his lawsuit against us because he wasn't going to win.
It was no gift.
 

zipp_rivals

Heisman
Jun 26, 2001
92,957
11,953
0
Again, Pitino walked away from his lawsuit against us because he wasn't going to win.
It was no gift.
It absolutely was a gift. Kevin Ollie just proved that again. Pitino had no serious charges leveled against him, and was fired early and without due process anyway. His decision saved U of L millions...
 

PushupMan

All-American
May 29, 2001
168,541
8,794
93
Except for lack of institutional control in strippergate case and conspiring with Adidas to pay a player $100K, Pitino had no serious charges against him.

Pitino walked away from that case because he was guilty of all of that, and he feared what damage it would cause to his future NCAA coaching prospects to have all of his actions drug out into a court of law and examined closely.
 

zipp_rivals

Heisman
Jun 26, 2001
92,957
11,953
0
Except for lack of institutional control in strippergate case and conspiring with Adidas to pay a player $100K, Pitino had no serious charges against him.

Pitino walked away from that case because he was guilty of all of that, and he feared what damage it would cause to his future NCAA coaching prospects to have all of his actions drug out into a court of law and examined closely.
NCAA said Pitino had no complicity in either situation. Plausible deniability is not an issue unless the failure to know is by design. Pitino’s wasn’t. He was purposely being excluded by adidas operatives.

It’s true he dropped his suit to open up coaching opportunities for himself. He dropped it over the advice of counsel. I wanted him to take clowns to the cleaners. Damn shame the way it turned out.

Pitino’s involvement was vetted by the FBI and the NCAA. It’s laughable suggesting the same inept group that failed magnificently in their pursuit of Doc Ramsey was gonna do a better job…
 
Last edited:

Morgantown Card

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2007
9,551
3,399
0
Again, Pitino walked away from his lawsuit against us because he wasn't going to win.
It was no gift.

Did you see them nasty, ugly, ******, stank trick-*** ho's? Didn't Antonio Blakeney say they looked "nasty, like they had diseases"? If Rick was gonna buy ho's, he would have flown in some ho's from Vegas, not these nasty tricks.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Rollem Cards