Yes, it fascinates me and I use it a lot right now BUT I expect it to keep getting better rather rapidly.Wondering if anybody here has tried it? I just subscribed so I could get the new GPT 4 model that came out. Apparently it scored 90th percentile in a variety of tests including the Bar exam, college entrance exams, etc. I suspect the world's going to become VERY different in a few years...
You could probably ask it to write it at a 10th grade level or whatever grade your student is in
Have it on good authority that AI would NOT elect to onside kick up two scores in the second half.
7th but reads at a 3rd. That's way too much forward thinking for my batch. Had a kid smoking a weed vape in class yesterday. We aren't even allowed to search a bag or make a student go into a classroom.
Yep, and it's not going to slow down. Microsoft just yesterday released integration into all of their office apps. I'm already rethinking a lot of what my career goals were. Everything is going to have to be condensed and I'm probably going to have to take more risks than I otherwise would. I don't think there's going to be jobs at all in 10 years... The progress of AI is going to be as massive a change as civilization has ever seen.
TLO verses New Jersey says you can search a bag in school. Your school district should ask chat gpt to explain that case.
Facts. China has a Tik Tok for its kids in China that is educational. The CCP tik tok in America is making our kids dumb as hell.
I remember reading something about this that TikTok in China and America are totally different. China is trying to destroy our attention spans so we get dumber, can't focus, and don't know what to do when sh(*t hits the fan. I'm also say another news article but can't find it where they did a study with high school and college kids. They don't understand why China is such a problem because all they care about is that they can continue to use TikTok.
I know you all think I “hate” teachers…. But I fully support the idea of you smacking the **** out of those types of dipshits. They should be kicked out of school if they prove they don’t want to be there, and given mandatory labor jobs to earn food and shelter.
This. While teachers annoy the f@ck out of me concerning a few topics, I REALLY feel for them when it comes to discipline in the school. Which doesn't exist. Morons in charge need to realize the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Agree. Trades need to be taught. I have a REALLY good group of kids this year but there are about 15-20 kids on campus that need to be removed and sent to a remote setting.
Too many administrators that like their cushy high paying jobs and wont have backbone and wont back the teachers, plus make teachers job harder by mandating things to justify their administrator role and salary.
Fools rush in where wise men fear to tread. But there’s investors to worry about so they’re gonna rush products out and not worry about anything going wrong until after it goes wrong.
I think Google, Facebook, and Microsoft were playing it safe and felt people weren't ready for this type of generative AI, but once OpenAI exploded in popularity they had no choice but to release there own versions even though they aren't ready.
Yeah I have a few friends whose main jobs is preparing fancy excel sheets and powerpoint presentations are very worried about this.
When Google bought an AI company maybe 10 years ago, I think it is called DeepMind (?). I remember reading that Google agreed to safeguards over the havoc that AI can (and now probably will) wreak. Facebook said no to those safeguards and their offer was consequently rejected-- at that time, Facebook had a mantra "move quickly and break things" that was their approach to technology (which explains their major f-ups in allowing bots to distribute fake news).
The genie is out of the bottle and it can't be put back in. It was probably inevitable, the technology is too capable to be fully controlled. In a sense, it was inevitable too. Very smart AI experts in the 90's were predicting that the ability of computers to match human intelligence would arrive by the 2020s. The only thing they were wrong about is that we'd need supercomputers in order to do it. Part of it was their assumptions were wrong. Turns out, higher order reasoning requires perhaps 1000-100000 times less of the computational requirements we had originally assumed.
