I'm sure there will be numerous articles about how he's maybe the GOAT. For me, he's a very good coach but not the GOAT.
He had a great team that stayed together for more than a decade with Duncan/Parker/Ginobilli and he won a lot with them. Also had David Robinson before and during Duncan's career.
But the last 6 years of his tenure, the most wins they had was 34. Spoelstra, as one example, continued to win at Miami when LeBron left. How come Pop couldn't continue to win with new players? In those last few seasons, several years they didn't win 30 games. That just doesn't make a strong case that Pop was the GOAT to me.
Give him great players and he won a lot. Many coaches have done that. When he had less talent, he did what almost every other coach does - lose a lot. How does that make him one of the all-time greats?
He had a great team that stayed together for more than a decade with Duncan/Parker/Ginobilli and he won a lot with them. Also had David Robinson before and during Duncan's career.
But the last 6 years of his tenure, the most wins they had was 34. Spoelstra, as one example, continued to win at Miami when LeBron left. How come Pop couldn't continue to win with new players? In those last few seasons, several years they didn't win 30 games. That just doesn't make a strong case that Pop was the GOAT to me.
Give him great players and he won a lot. Many coaches have done that. When he had less talent, he did what almost every other coach does - lose a lot. How does that make him one of the all-time greats?