Yeah, that is not spending. Not in any twisted contortion of the collectivist mind.
OT: Voter ID
- Thread starter Scoop123
- Start date
Disagree and agree. Voting is already WAY too easy that it has somewhat lost its meaning. I agree with Voter ID.
Interesting.
soon it will just be done on an app. Just wait for the **** storm! Hahaha
Using an app would ACTUALLY result in disenfranchising more people than Voter ID ever would (which is a huge myth / scare tactic). Also would create even more ways to commit fraud, most likely.
Really. Where do you think the money that was going to be collected from them would have gone?
Unless you're implying the budget and spending are somehow not intertwined?
Like some have said, I am for ID to vote but most of the cheating by the libs is the mail in ballot, like probably 95% of it.
Here in crooked California I’ve gone to bed on election nights with republicans ahead by like 4-5% only to wake up to literally ALL of them being behind by the late night magical ballot dumps of “mail in “ ballots.
Here in CA it’s like 60-35 favoring libs and you’re telling me that magically 95% of mail in voters are all libs?
I prefer no mail in ballots and ID together. It’s no shock that the no voter ID and mail in states are won big by Libs
Of course, they don’t give a **** about cheating as long as it helps them.. or fraud for that matter… and so on
Here in crooked California I’ve gone to bed on election nights with republicans ahead by like 4-5% only to wake up to literally ALL of them being behind by the late night magical ballot dumps of “mail in “ ballots.
Here in CA it’s like 60-35 favoring libs and you’re telling me that magically 95% of mail in voters are all libs?
I prefer no mail in ballots and ID together. It’s no shock that the no voter ID and mail in states are won big by Libs
Of course, they don’t give a **** about cheating as long as it helps them.. or fraud for that matter… and so on
I would agree, but standing in line for hours to vote after work is not acceptable, IMO. If vote by mail is banned, there needs to be a quicker way to vote.
How do all these people go to the doctor or get medicine if they are too stupid to get an ID?
it was interesting when epstein was talking to bannon about subprime mortgages, and how clinton used carter's community reinvestment act to force banks to do predatory lending to make the housing bubble...which 0bama bailed out while he printed 17 trillion....that really put the US on shaky footing deficit spending.
Last edited:
I got my information from article I read on a Seattle news site that stated the employees of the Department of Licensing knowing were signing up unqualified people to vote. I am not up on immigration law as I was born in the US to US born citizens but can people with green cards or have another legal status such as student visas get a social security number? These residents would not be eligible to vote.
I have a friend who was an exchange student at my high school. This person liked it so well that they went to the University of Nebraska, got married, got a job, became a citizen, founded a company, built a building in downtown O and has a family living in Nebraska. I know for a fact this person had a job that would require at least a driver's license when we were in college. I worked the same job three summers. This was back in the seventies, and I don't think it was as big a deal.
The Left: “It’s time for a woman president”
Also the Left: “Women are too stupid to fill out basic forms”
Also the Left: “Women are too stupid to fill out basic forms”
Ha, you stole that from a tweet! Come on. That is ******* sad! Hahaha
This is a post board, what kind of a loser do you have to be to steal a joke???
With that said, I love the joke and I kind of love that you stole it and tried to pass it off as your own.
What is next? Drinking, creeping on girls half your age and not being able to have an adult relationship??? HAHAHA
Last edited:
Nice idea. But, good luck getting private industry to abide. There are multiple national holidays most don't get time off for. MLK day, President's day, Veteran's day, etc.
Yeah, I suppose since voting is not mandatory it would be hard to make private industry comply.
No way in Hades is California 60-35 Democrat.
I see it more as 55-45 Democrat. This is the California voting map from 2020 vs 2024.
If you're too lazy or inconvenienced to vote then you shouldn't vote
The federal government should always be invited into the states, not the other way around. They do not get to dictate how states run things outside of interstates and some civil rights. States can be degenerate and stupid and if they are it would take a will of god to get congress to agree on something like a civil rights bill, but otherwise, Washington needs to eff off.
Yes. And voting has never been “difficult”. In the not too distant past, a person’s vote meant something. You got 1 vote and you knew everyone else only got 1 vote (unless you lived in Chicago). Now that voting is “easier” it is much more corrupted and fraudulent.
Lifelong republican that switched to independent in 2017. I don’t consider myself left leaning, just right thinking, so maybe I am of no concern to the OP.
A driver’s license or state-issued ID should be required. And checks to match the database before vote is counted. But in my experience this has always been the case. I live in Colorado which now has mail-in ballots. It’s a nice system. You don’t get a ballot unless you are registered/verified ahead of time.
I was an election judge for my precinct in 2006. This was before the change to mail ballots and they had the voter machines. I served as an election judge to see how the process worked, and I thought it was all above board. But sub-optimum. In-person voting on one day has some major inherent flaws compared to mail-in ballots.
One drawback to that old system is that you could easily show up in the booth on Election Day and be confronted with issues you have no awareness of. With the mail-in ballots you can see what you are being asked to vote one and have 2-3 weeks to research the things you are unsure about.
A driver’s license or state-issued ID should be required. And checks to match the database before vote is counted. But in my experience this has always been the case. I live in Colorado which now has mail-in ballots. It’s a nice system. You don’t get a ballot unless you are registered/verified ahead of time.
I was an election judge for my precinct in 2006. This was before the change to mail ballots and they had the voter machines. I served as an election judge to see how the process worked, and I thought it was all above board. But sub-optimum. In-person voting on one day has some major inherent flaws compared to mail-in ballots.
One drawback to that old system is that you could easily show up in the booth on Election Day and be confronted with issues you have no awareness of. With the mail-in ballots you can see what you are being asked to vote one and have 2-3 weeks to research the things you are unsure about.
Husker 88, the map means nothing, The Blue area of the state has the much larger, dominant population compared to the Red area. The Blue has San Fransico, LA, San Diego and all along the coast. You can't go by the amount of area on the three West Coast states. Oregon the vast majority of the state is Red, but Portland and the Willamette Valley (the most populous area) are solid Blue. Eastern Oregon talks of seceding to Idaho. Washington is almost all Red except for King, Pierce, Kitsap and Snohomish counties (Seattle, Tacoma, Bremerton, and Everett) that has all the population, King County alone has more people than Nebraska. The Red area of Oregon and Washington are made up of high desert, mountains, wheat, cattle and ag lands. Isn't that true for Nebraska as well. I am no expert, but I bet Omaha and Lincoln are far Bluer than the rest of the state. Sometime in the future the Nebraska Legislature will probably be controlled by the Democrats as the Lincoln and Omaha grow and the rest of the state loses its population. I drive throughout Southeast and South-Central Nebraska every May. I do not see much growth, but I see it from Lincoln to Omaha.
If you were required to:
1) show an ID
2) pass a drug test
3) produce a W2
leftists would never win another election
1) show an ID
2) pass a drug test
3) produce a W2
leftists would never win another election
When will those of you on the left Admit you support a party that is corrupt and cheats in elections?
Your own leaders are lying to you about voter ID and I’m not sure many on the left care. Look at the New York communist, requiring multiple forms ID just to shovel snow. He must be racist and not want blacks and women to apply.
Do you get it yet? Since most of you won’t speak up about it we are left to assume you know they are cheating (and lying to you ) and do not care as long as they do not get caught.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/zohran-mamdani-gets-ruthlessly-mocked-222253867.html
Your own leaders are lying to you about voter ID and I’m not sure many on the left care. Look at the New York communist, requiring multiple forms ID just to shovel snow. He must be racist and not want blacks and women to apply.
Do you get it yet? Since most of you won’t speak up about it we are left to assume you know they are cheating (and lying to you ) and do not care as long as they do not get caught.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/zohran-mamdani-gets-ruthlessly-mocked-222253867.html
I believe it used to be in some states that in order to absentee vote you had to do so in front of a notary public. Now states like California they just mail out ballots to the last known address of all citizens of voting age