It's close but I think I've got to go with 'approving' sexual relationship between 13 year old son and teacher. But, damn, the moron in Cincy who neglected to keep her child from getting into the gorilla cage gave it a helluva shot.
Neglecting your child and having them potentially be torn apart limb by limb vs. allowing them to have sex prematurely....
....and you think allowing them to have sex is worse?
I think it's more worse for the parents to impregnate a 13 year old gorilla.
Willy, I agree, especially if it's the mom that got the gorilla pregnant. But I wonder, who would pay the child support?
Well, if she wears a strap on loaded with warm gorilla *****, then she could definitely pull it off.
Zoo will prolly care for the kid.
Let's see when I was 13 I was in the 7th grade. As I recall I had a smokin' hot English teacher named Ms. Reed who wore some very short skirts to school. If my dad would have given me the okay to get busy with her, I would have voted for him as parent of the century and bought him some new fishing tackle. But then again at age 13 I was thinking more about learning how to put good wood on a dang curve ball in little league instead of thinking about putting good wood to Ms. Reed.
I have no issues with Cincinnati Zoo mom. They said it took about 5 to 10 seconds for the kid to get into the gorilla exhibit. Anyone on here that has or used to have a 4 year old, and says they never took their eyes off them for 10 seconds, is a liar. It's the most overblown story of the year so far. The Prosecutor is not going to file charges. The family has already refused to accept private money donations. And they've already said they will not seek money from the Zoo.
In spite of the socially accepted differences based on gender....the parents that allowed their teenager to have a sexual relationship with a woman twice his age are by far the worst parents. If the teen had been a girl and the teacher a man, those parents would have knocked Cincinnati Zoo mom out of the headlines by now.