So thats what defense looks like??!! Great effort and hustle especially for an exhibition game. I thought our switching was phenomenal.
Night and day different from last season.
yes it’s an exhibition. But our rebounding weakness was evident in the exhibitions last year.
it’s a strength now.
Yep, a heel for us last year.Rebounding may have been the biggest difference with the defense tonight...when the Purdue missed a shot, the possession ended almost every time...
57 FG attempts, 7 offensive rebounds... so 1 offensive rebound for roughly every 8 possessions.
How many times last year did the team play pretty solid defense only to give up an off rebound for an eventual score by the opposition?
This team is very athletic and long, that is going to bother some teams. It almost reminds me of some old Pitino teams.So thats what defense looks like??!! Great effort and hustle especially for an exhibition game. I thought our switching was phenomenal.
Having guys like Mo D, Garrison, Aberdeen, etc.. they can switch and defend most players on the court. It’s why Garrison is better than most think. He is very good defending wings on the perimeter in switching situations.Jelly had a couple of great defensive sets on the mismatch with the point guard.
Purdue looked slow and out of shape by comparison. Kentucky's depth was a huge factor.This team is very athletic and long, that is going to bother some teams. It almost reminds me of some old Pitino teams.
Coach has our squad ready to go. Reminds me of Pitino’s old conditioning. Out work, out hustle and out grinding people will win you a lot of damn games.Purdue looked slow and out of shape by comparison. Kentucky's depth was a huge factor.
So thats what defense looks like??!! Great effort and hustle especially for an exhibition game. I thought our switching was phenomenal.
We did.I honestly thought that's where this team struggled a bit was switching off screens which put Purdue on the free throw line a lot more than they should’ve been. We bailed them out multiple times, in a tight game, that’s oftentimes the difference between winning or losing.
Good points all around, ILWildcat....Agreed. The defense is much better. Our rotations are solid with this group. The pick and roll killed us last season, as did the ball screens, back screens, even screens for guys to cut across the lane. I was especially impressed with Diaboute defending the big men on screens and in the lane. He was solid hedging on screens, helping stop dribble penetration, getting back to his man on the roll. There were only a few times their guys got good looks. But if you watched this Purdue team last year, you know that they destroyed multiple teams with pick and rolls and multiple screens all over the floor, and they did it over and over again. They were not running their offense like they did last spring, despite their best efforts. And they should be ahead of UK, given all their returning players.
I'm gonna say the defense will carry this team's this season, especially early on. And imagine this- this UK teams hasn't really had much chance to build chemistry on offense yet. The defense is in sync, no doubt, but the offense will get better.
I was laughing at Jimmy Dyke's comments at the end, as he was saying how much better Purdue will be if these teams meet again I was thinking...
Aren't we missing our starting pg?
Isn't this UK team just developing chemistry?
How much better will our offense get?
It's just a joke, really. UK was clearly better tonight and, given the returning players for Purdue who shouldn't have missed a beat and the fact that we were missing our starting pg, there is every reason to think UK will improve more over the season than Purdue.
Particularly noteworthy considering how early it is.So thats what defense looks like??!! Great effort and hustle especially for an exhibition game. I thought our switching was phenomenal.
Good statRebounding may have been the biggest difference with the defense tonight...when the Purdue missed a shot, the possession ended almost every time...
57 FG attempts, 7 offensive rebounds... so 1 offensive rebound for roughly every 8 possessions.
How many times last year did the team play pretty solid defense only to give up an off rebound for an eventual score by the opposition?
Good stat
Every single time Amari Williams went to the bench.Rebounding may have been the biggest difference with the defense tonight...when the Purdue missed a shot, the possession ended almost every time...
57 FG attempts, 7 offensive rebounds... so 1 offensive rebound for roughly every 8 possessions.
How many times last year did the team play pretty solid defense only to give up an off rebound for an eventual score by the opposition?