Our ridiculously unrealistic path to #9

WACB

All-Conference
Nov 16, 2009
9,316
1,250
0
Based on various computer ranking systems:


Jeff Sagarin PREDICTOR
----------------------
(16) 64 Saint Mary's-Cal.
(8) 32 Purdue
(4) 16 Notre Dame
(2) 8 Utah
(1) 4 Arizona
(1) 2 Wisconsin


kenpom.com
----------------------
(16) 64 South Carolina
(8) 32 Maryland
(4) 16 Notre Dame
(2) 8 Utah
(1) 4 Wisconsin
(1) 2 Arizona


Massey Ratings
----------------------
(16) 64 Kansas St
(8) 32 LSU
(4) 16 UNC***
(2) 8 Kansas
(1) 4 Duke
(1) 2 Virginia


RPI
----------------------
(16) 64 Harvard
(8) 32 Buffalo
(4) 16 Louisville
(2) 8 Gonzaga
(1) 4 Villanova
(1) 2 Kansas


BPI
----------------------
(16) 64 Illinois State
(8) 32 Iowa
(4) 16 Ohio State
(2) 8 Kansas
(1) 4 Arizona
(1) 2 Wisconsin


Which one would you want?
 

*dezyDECO*

All-Conference
Nov 9, 2014
7,658
2,469
62
I'll take the RPI:



RPI
----------------------
(16) 64 Harvard
(8) 32 Buffalo
(4) 16 Louisville
(2) 8 Gonzaga
(1) 4 Villanova
(1) 2 Kansas

KU in the Title Game, without Alexander... seems like easy pickin's!
 

WACB

All-Conference
Nov 16, 2009
9,316
1,250
0
Originally posted by Prime MF:

Kenpom and Massey are wrong, at large teams don't get 16 seeds.
That's what makes it ridiculously unrealistic. I just looked at the top 64 teams.
 

FiveStarCat

All-American
Oct 3, 2009
10,758
5,580
0
This is roughly the way it should be. "Geography" (in quotes because what the NCAA really means when they say that is "money") is skewing the bracket balance in a way that is unfair to the Midwest.
 
Nov 15, 2008
38,645
57,515
0
South Carolina? Pomeroy has been smoking rock again.


 
Nov 15, 2008
38,645
57,515
0
Originally posted by Big_Blue79:
^ ah yes, the old "algorithm doing drugs." Mmm... computer code drugs.
To suggest South Carolina will win the SEC Tournament as the 11th seed and grab the automatic berth...yeah I would like to see the size of the rock those coders burnt before they input those variables.