Toggle sidebar

Palmquist

N

NightKnight

All-Conference
Jul 21, 2008
3,272
1,721
68
My rough estimate on Palmquist from 3:
Early in shot clock , stepping into the shot: 45%
Late in shot clock: 32%
Play run for Oskar: 35% (small sample)
Corner 3: 35%
Open floor 3: 40%

Our guards haven't always put him in the best shooting position, but if you're a bench guy getting less than 8 minutes per game, you can't expect too much tailoring to suit you. I don't see how he will get much better this year. I think he can change some of his approach to defending bigger players and improve that way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUPete
cubuffsdoug_rivals

cubuffsdoug_rivals

Heisman
Apr 8, 2002
15,876
28,117
113
RUJMM78 said:
The disadvantage was that Spencer was the only somewhat consistent 3 point scoring threat on the court last season.
Click to expand...
Much of that had to do with the fact that Rutgers ran more plays for Spencer. Others were lucky to get a play (3pt) called for them.
 
NewJerseyHawk

NewJerseyHawk

Heisman
Jan 11, 2007
24,773
39,628
113
The faster our guard push the ball after securing the rebound, there are shots available early in the shot clock with Palmquist, Griffiths running to an open spot from 3.

The question is going to be is RU willing to play defense for 25 to 30 seconds and then take an early transition 3, only to have to play more defense for another 25 to 30 seconds?? Only if you have improved the backcourt, the footspeed and can apply pressure to the opposing guards.

I am not advocating playing like Iowa, but Iowa was or has been able to assign just 1 ballhawk (Joe Toussaint as an example) on the lead guard and speed up their opposition. That led to other Iowa players getting into more shot attempts.

The ideal situation is you have 10 to 11 very good players like Michigan State, with 4 to 5 of them, being plus defenders on the ball. They provide the most consistent example of how they generate turnovers or pressure on the ball and then get secondary shots in transition.

Palmquist (maybe Chol), Griffiths along with Hyatt getting a lot of 3s, is a signal that we can get cheap baskets before a defense gets set. The guard play supplements and expands the limitations of the forwards from having to generate their own offense off the dribble. Palmquist needs to defend and rebound better, to allow his shooting to help RU. We can't have a situation where Palmquist missing shots AND doesn't play good enough defense, results in an overall complete negative player across the board.....

RU had too many net-negative players on last year's roster, where if those players missed shots or didn't score enough, those players couldn't generate defensive pressure to do anything else well. Palmquist has enough time in the system to improve defensively now, it's up to him (and Hyatt more specifically), to find ways to improve on defense. Hyatt does rebound, Palmquist needs to step it up too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU84
N

NickRU714

Heisman
Aug 18, 2009
14,320
13,139
113
High Quality H2O said:
Would missing more 3s help us last year?
Click to expand...

I think it's a higher level argument.
We need to not put ourself in a situation where we need to limit 3s because shooting more is a disadvantage.

Luckily it seems we've built the roster differently (prioritizing offense a bit more) going forward with Fernandes, Griffith, Bailey, likely Harper.

I can already hear the football arguments "We can't pass more. We have to rely on the run because that's the stronger unit. Passing more will just be worse."
The solution is to build the roster (and system) such that we attempt to avoid this situation unless as a last resort.
 
M

MLBash93

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2012
1,507
2,175
113
NickRU714 said:
I think it's a higher level argument.
We need to not put ourself in a situation where we need to limit 3s because shooting more is a disadvantage.

Luckily it seems we've built the roster differently (prioritizing offense a bit more) going forward with Fernandes, Griffith, Bailey, likely Harper.

I can already hear the football arguments "We can't pass more. We have to rely on the run because that's the stronger unit. Passing more will just be worse."
The solution is to build the roster (and system) such that we attempt to avoid this situation unless as a last resort.
Click to expand...
Fernades won't be here with the other 3 in 2024-25
 
H

High Quality H2O

All-Conference
May 7, 2022
1,391
2,185
57
NickRU714 said:
I think it's a higher level argument.
We need to not put ourself in a situation where we need to limit 3s because shooting more is a disadvantage.

Luckily it seems we've built the roster differently (prioritizing offense a bit more) going forward with Fernandes, Griffith, Bailey, likely Harper.

I can already hear the football arguments "We can't pass more. We have to rely on the run because that's the stronger unit. Passing more will just be worse."
The solution is to build the roster (and system) such that we attempt to avoid this situation unless as a last resort.
Click to expand...
Well I agree, it would be an advantage to have a roster with more 3 point shooting ability, provided they can D up.

However last year we didn’t have many of those folks. And some with glaring issues shooting.

Hence… me being a smart ***. I couldn’t resist that one.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: NickRU714
You must log in or register to reply here.
The Knight Report

Latest

  1. 01 The Knight Report Football ESPN FPI projects Rutgers Football's 2026 schedule - Week Three
  2. 02 The Knight Report Join The Knight Report TODAY for $1 and get 50% off!
  3. 03 The Knight Report Basketball Recruiting Four-Star, Top 100 Recruit Recaps Rutgers Basketball Official Visit
  4. 04 The Knight Report Greg Schiano Previews Howard / Rutgers + Final Thoughts on USC - TKR Pod
  5. 05 The Knight Report Everything Rutgers Football HC Greg Schiano said ahead of Howard game week
Top Bottom