Petrino Timeline

docholiday51

Heisman
Oct 19, 2001
22,011
26,718
0
The fact that Petrino (because of his long history of a lack of ethics) and Pitino(in view of his more recent history)are at UL says all that needs to be said about UL's football and basketball programs. Only UNC has done more to tarnish college athletics in the recent past,win at all costs,do whatever it takes to win and rules or ethical behavior be damned that is the state of the programs at UL.If they are fine with it so am I they are still nothing more than a second rate program trying to convince the world that they are something that they will never be.
 

rockycard

Heisman
Jan 8, 2007
129,782
10,816
0
The fact that Petrino (because of his long history of a lack of ethics) and Pitino(in view of his more recent history)are at UL says all that needs to be said about UL's football and basketball programs. Only UNC has done more to tarnish college athletics in the recent past,win at all costs,do whatever it takes to win and rules or ethical behavior be damned that is the state of the programs at UL.If they are fine with it so am I they are still nothing more than a second rate program trying to convince the world that they are something that they will never be.
Second rate programs usually aren't ranked in all of the major sports, but I guess that isn't a factor in your outlook.
 

docholiday51

Heisman
Oct 19, 2001
22,011
26,718
0
Second rate programs usually aren't ranked in all of the major sports, but I guess that isn't a factor in your outlook.
We agree on that point,rankings are one thing,UL's situation with these two(Petrino and Pitino) is a whole other matter or issue.
 

adkinsrg

Redshirt
Apr 28, 2005
43
13
0
I think some day UK will climb to some level of respectability in footall. Until then, in an effort to take this thread seriously, someone please post Petrino's TIMELINE of victories against UK
 

jauk11

Heisman
Dec 6, 2006
60,631
18,638
0
Second rate programs usually aren't ranked in all of the major sports, but I guess that isn't a factor in your outlook.

Yeah, Card fans should have a lot of experience with that over the years.

What are you doing on our board?
 
Sep 2, 2002
5,770
5,586
113
EVERY year? This too will pass, my son.

Oh wait, you are the Father, well, uh, gee------

Anyway I think we have a bowl game this year AND a very good year next year-------without the stench of BP and probably with a win over him.

I hope you're right, I'd love it if Stoops works out here. He's going to have to show a lot better coaching than he has so far though.
 
Oct 1, 2001
5,199
1,898
0
You need to get a life and move on. I am not going to defend Bobby's early moves up through the ARK mass except to say that their is 2 sides to the Falcon deal. The Falcons owner promised total control over the players. Bobby wanted to make changes the owner said no and went back on his word. At that point he Ark needed a coach and he went back to college which was a better fit.

Since WKU hired him he has kept his word. He never promised to stay at WKU and agreeded to a contract that gave WKU most of his salary back when he left. He also left most of his staff, the core of his offense and his OC Jeff Brohm to keep them moving forward and they have done well.

At UL he has been a different coach in dealing with the media and players. The teams academics have stayed strong and the team is doing well. His contract has a buyout so he won't be leaving. He the biggest local Petrino critics will say this.

The twitter thing is a lot over nothing. If you really believe a HC in the middle of AUgust camp is sending out tweets and likes I have a bridge to sell you. Most coaches have staff that maintain those accounts.
Either a young staffer made a mistake or somebody else did it. Either way it is not a big deal.
Spoken eloquently with blinders on to justify Mr. Petrino's history as a football coach. You wanted to win and you have due to his considerable ability to succeed. There is nothing more to discuss.
 

jasonukfan

Redshirt
Jun 24, 2003
1
0
0
A lot of folks wanted success regardless of what it took to achieve it. We had a taste with Brooks and folks wanted more. He went one way and UK went another, but I think the styles that each coach has fits their respective universities better than what a lot of UK fans were wanting (I.e. BP).
That was ONLY because they were being incorrectly informed that all of Barnhart's targets were saying no, and they were panicking. At that time, most didn't know that the search had already landed on Mark Stoops.
 

NewEraCATS

All-Conference
Sep 16, 2015
1,914
2,677
113
As yall should know, at UofLol, as long as you get the W, they will overlook just about anything. He has taken them back to the top 25 again.
 

jauk11

Heisman
Dec 6, 2006
60,631
18,638
0
Posting on a message board. Do you only want to hear from people that think like you?

Second rate programs? Maybe you are thinking of your other adulterer (and abortionist) sport. And the Minardi Hall affair might not be over with yet, although the NCAA seldom gets it right.
 

Blueaz

Heisman
Jul 7, 2009
27,964
30,092
113
Does anyone think that there is a group of UK fans that lurk the UL board and post every time UK, a UK player or UK coach is mentioned?

They have about half of their first dozen threads concerning something to do with UK... I wonder how many UK fans are in those threads.

But, UK is the one school they claim is irrelevant to them...
 

katfanuno

All-Conference
Apr 15, 2008
1,634
1,035
113
I wouldn't take petrino and his filth for any wins. He is where he belongs, with the other filth at city college. Lying, Prostitutes and abortion, sounds pretty thuggish to me. You can have all of it tard fans. Enjoy :)
 

STUCKNBIG10

All-Conference
Aug 30, 2006
7,302
2,861
0
Does anyone think that there is a group of UK fans that lurk the UL board and post every time UK, a UK player or UK coach is mentioned?

They have about half of their first dozen threads concerning something to do with UK... I wonder how many UK fans are in those threads.

But, UK is the one school they claim is irrelevant to them...

No, they wouldn't allow it. They allow zero difference in opinion on the two UL boards (Scout and rivals). UK fans get zero tolerance, and even UL fans that have dared to question the scandal and the associated coaches and AD, get vilified and labeled as trolls or closet UK fans. For this reason, I find it highly amusing to see rockycard ask a UK fan if he only wanted to hear opinions like his. I find this board to be much more tolerant of UL fans and differing opinions that theirs boards are for us. If not, then Wildcard and steelers and all of those guys who constantly throw flames would never be allowed to continue posting here.
 

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
39,890
60,246
113
Today Malcolm McClain, or whoever the lastest 680 instigator is named, said that Bobby P has proven he can beat better teams with less talent.

When?
 

ukalum1988

Heisman
Dec 21, 2014
12,146
31,384
113
That was ONLY because they were being incorrectly informed that all of Barnhart's targets were saying no, and they were panicking. At that time, most didn't know that the search had already landed on Mark Stoops.
Hey Jason, welcome to the board!! Good to see you over here!
 

ULoverUK

Freshman
Jun 18, 2001
2,383
84
0
I think a lot forget Bobby at UL so far has yet to beat Clemson or Florida St. His best win has been beating a depleted Notre Dame team. I know former players pushed for his hire here but I'm glad UK passed.

Woah...hold on there. Yes he has yet to beat Clemson or FSU but both Clemson games were a nail biter and Clemson just about shiatt their pants. One FSU game was almost an upset but last years game at FSU got away from them late. That same "depleted Notre Dame team" as you state that UofL beat went on to beat LSU in a bowl game 2 games later. All that, with playing with a young O-line that Strong had not built depth on and a bunch of players not designed for Petrinos style of play. Everywhere he has played it was year 3 that was his best teams.
 

Blueaz

Heisman
Jul 7, 2009
27,964
30,092
113
Woah...hold on there. Yes he has yet to beat Clemson or FSU but both Clemson games were a nail biter and Clemson just about shiatt their pants. One FSU game was almost an upset but last years game at FSU got away from them late. That same "depleted Notre Dame team" as you state that UofL beat went on to beat LSU in a bowl game 2 games later. All that, with playing with a young O-line that Strong had not built depth on and a bunch of players not designed for Petrinos style of play. Everywhere he has played it was year 3 that was his best teams.
WKND
Does anyone think that there is a group of UK fans that lurk the UL board and post every time UK, a UK player or UK coach is mentioned?

They have about half of their first dozen threads concerning something to do with UK... I wonder how many UK fans are in those threads.

But, UK is the one school they claim is irrelevant to them...
 

ULoverUK

Freshman
Jun 18, 2001
2,383
84
0
"Does anyone think that there is a group of UK fans that lurk the UL board and post every time UK, a UK player or UK coach is mentioned?

They have about half of their first dozen threads concerning something to do with UK... I wonder how many UK fans are in those threads.

But, UK is the one school they claim is irrelevant to them..."

Actually this is a lie. Half of the first dozen posts do not involve UK. There are 3 on the entire page presently. A UK poster jvolk responds fairly frequently but not many UK posters reply on the football thread for obvious reasons. Come basketball season there are more UK fans that will post.
 

Kats23

All-American
Nov 21, 2007
8,681
5,908
63
Woah...hold on there. Yes he has yet to beat Clemson or FSU but both Clemson games were a nail biter and Clemson just about shiatt their pants. One FSU game was almost an upset but last years game at FSU got away from them late. That same "depleted Notre Dame team" as you state that UofL beat went on to beat LSU in a bowl game 2 games later. All that, with playing with a young O-line that Strong had not built depth on and a bunch of players not designed for Petrinos style of play. Everywhere he has played it was year 3 that was his best teams.

You can be happy he's your coach at UL. You can make all the excuses you want for how you almost beat this team or that team. But, the fact remains, his best win is against a ND team at the time was missing several key players. I don't follow ND, I don't know how healthy they got by bowl season but I know at the time, key guys were out against UL.

We'll see what happens this year. UL's success is going to come down to the QB play of Jackson and how consistent he can play. Petrino will probably beat UK again this year and all this talk will begin again but I'm glad UK passed even though I'm not 100% sold or happy with Stoops so far.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ok-cats-computer