Yep, except he never does it. Ironic.Originally posted by P19978:
Truer words were never spoken.Originally posted by Big_Blue79:
Plenty to criticize the president for without reaching, imho.
Yep, except he never does it. Ironic.Originally posted by P19978:
Truer words were never spoken.Originally posted by Big_Blue79:
Plenty to criticize the president for without reaching, imho.
Originally posted by Big_Blue79:
And no f'ing way you guys believe there are no moderate Muslims fighting against terrorist organizations, right? You have to know that's just a ridiculous assertion. I simply cannot believe that living, breathing people actually believe that there is a dearth of moderate Muslims taking action, speaking out, etc... when we live in an age of Google and access to news from around the world. But that's just me talking after doing < 5 minutes of simple searching.
As I said and you have kind of prove my point. The only time these "moderate muslims" take a stand is when it is being done to them. Outside of that, they sing in the streets when it happens to us.Originally posted by Big_Blue79:
"I am extremely skeptical that calling terrorists Islamic extremists (or Islamic terrorists or whatever) will push moderate Muslims to "take a stand and stop the madness." I think it would have the opposite (if any) effect. Most violence committed by these terrorist groups is against other Muslims. So how is the president saying "Islamic terrorists" the tipping point? Hey, I know you raped and tortured and killed, but NOW I AM READY TO FIGHT BECAUSE PRESIDENT OBAMA CALLED THEM ISLAMIC EXTREMISTS! The argument is not at all compelling. And again, it plays right into the what ISIL and al-Qaeda want. They want it to be the West against Islam."
if only the shooter had been a conservative, the truth could've been told. Somethings never change......
Like the guy who killed people at the DC family group because he was mad at Chick Fil-A and the OWS guys that were caught planning to blow up bridges and the GOP convention, he will be forgotten very quickly.Originally posted by Mojocat:
if only the shooter had been a conservative, the truth could've been told. Somethings never change......
Well I guess that proves what we all have been suspecting - Rachel Maddow, the Huffington Post and Bill Nye the Science Guy hate Muslims!Originally posted by Mojocat:
if only the shooter had been a conservative, the truth could've been told. Somethings never change......
Facts are facts on how such tragedies are treated by the media. When James Holmes shot up the Colorado theater a national media member's first reaction was to do a name search of local Tea Party members to find a match. And then even worst was the leap to judgement, instantly, after the Gabby Giffords mass shooting.Originally posted by Deeeefense:
Well I guess that proves what we all have been suspecting - Rachel Maddow, the Huffington Post and Bill Nye the Science Guy hate Muslims!
Neil deGrasse Tyson? Seriously?![]()
Yesterday, after we find out the UNC shooter was a liberal atheist and had several run-ins about parking with the victims, their friend goes on CNN and blames the shooting on Fox and Bobby Jindal hate toward Muslims. Ishitunot.Originally posted by JHB4UK: Facts are facts on how such tragedies are treated by the media. When James Holmes shot up the Colorado theater a national media member's first reaction was to do a name search of local Tea Party members to find a match. And then even worst was the leap to judgement, instantly, after the Gabby Giffords mass shooting.
Tea Parties!
Palin's gunsights!
As ridiculous as it is, it's actually more reasonable than most of the Lib-Dem arguments on here.Originally posted by qwesley:
Yesterday, after we find out the UNC shooter was a liberal atheist and had several run-ins about parking with the victims, their friend goes on CNN and blames the shooting on Fox and Bobby Jindal hate toward Muslims. Ishitunot.Originally posted by JHB4UK:
Facts are facts on how such tragedies are treated by the media. When James Holmes shot up the Colorado theater a national media member's first reaction was to do a name search of local Tea Party members to find a match. And then even worst was the leap to judgement, instantly, after the Gabby Giffords mass shooting.
Tea Parties!
Palin's gunsights!
Sounds as reasonable as some arguments we see on here.
1. I have.Originally posted by qwesley:
Yep, except he never does it. Ironic.Originally posted by P19978:
Truer words were never spoken.Originally posted by Big_Blue79:
Plenty to criticize the president for without reaching, imho.
~ 1.6 billion Muslims in the world. Maybe painting with such a broad brush isn't helpful. The reality is that there are way too many Muslims that are sympathetic towards terrorist groups. And there are also many (anywhere from the vast majority to a majority... give or take some because polls vary wildly by region, question, and when the survey is taken) that abhor and reject the hijacking of their religion. Similar to my disgust with groups like Westboro Baptist (not equating the two, so everyone calm down... I know how the Paddock worksOriginally posted by warrior-cat:
As I said and you have kind of prove my point. The only time these "moderate muslims" take a stand is when it is being done to them. Outside of that, they sing in the streets when it happens to us.Originally posted by Big_Blue79:
"I am extremely skeptical that calling terrorists Islamic extremists (or Islamic terrorists or whatever) will push moderate Muslims to "take a stand and stop the madness." I think it would have the opposite (if any) effect. Most violence committed by these terrorist groups is against other Muslims. So how is the president saying "Islamic terrorists" the tipping point? Hey, I know you raped and tortured and killed, but NOW I AM READY TO FIGHT BECAUSE PRESIDENT OBAMA CALLED THEM ISLAMIC EXTREMISTS! The argument is not at all compelling. And again, it plays right into the what ISIL and al-Qaeda want. They want it to be the West against Islam."
The president calling them "Islamic Terrorist" is not the tipping point but, it goes a long way in facing the facts for what they are.
That strategy has failed and is making things worse. Yemen has helped prove that. How can anyone really defend Obama's position on this after that? Seriously, the only people who can are the koolaid drinkers and agenda driven lemmings. While our enemies around the world are terrorizing, raping, and killing people including American hostages, the clown in the white house is making silly videos trying to make fun of his critics while trying to save his legacy (Obamacare). These enemies are islamic and muslims so, call them what and who they are and deal with it. If you and Obama are afraid or in support of these idiots, step aside and let someone else lead.Originally posted by Big_Blue79:
~ 1.6 billion Muslims in the world. Maybe painting with such a broad brush isn't helpful. The reality is that there are way too many Muslims that are sympathetic towards terrorist groups. And there are also many (anywhere from the vast majority to a majority... give or take some because polls vary wildly by region, question, and when the survey is taken) that abhor and reject the hijacking of their religion. Similar to my disgust with groups like Westboro Baptist (not equating the two, so everyone calm down... I know how the Paddock worksOriginally posted by warrior-cat:
As I said and you have kind of prove my point. The only time these "moderate muslims" take a stand is when it is being done to them. Outside of that, they sing in the streets when it happens to us.Originally posted by Big_Blue79:
"I am extremely skeptical that calling terrorists Islamic extremists (or Islamic terrorists or whatever) will push moderate Muslims to "take a stand and stop the madness." I think it would have the opposite (if any) effect. Most violence committed by these terrorist groups is against other Muslims. So how is the president saying "Islamic terrorists" the tipping point? Hey, I know you raped and tortured and killed, but NOW I AM READY TO FIGHT BECAUSE PRESIDENT OBAMA CALLED THEM ISLAMIC EXTREMISTS! The argument is not at all compelling. And again, it plays right into the what ISIL and al-Qaeda want. They want it to be the West against Islam."
The president calling them "Islamic Terrorist" is not the tipping point but, it goes a long way in facing the facts for what they are.). Speaking in these absolutes, besides being literally untrue, I'm just not sure how it's supposed to accomplish anything. It's great AM radio (and I guess Internet message board) fodder.
Again, I disagree that the president calling them Islamic terrorists does anything helpful. Okay, so you "fac[e] facts." Now what? "Hey, moderates, your religion is terrorism" doesn't seem like a great way to engage. Islamic is literally what the terrorists want to be perceived as, and it provides a facade (however fake) of legitimacy. Removing their attempted legitimacy and exposing them for the cowardly murderers that they are seems like a far better strategy. I really just don't understand the desire of so many to make this a religious war (a Crusdade?).
IDGAF if it's Obama, Bush, Ronald Reagan's ghost, Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter, you, me, or The Gimp from Pulp Fiction, so save the "koolaid drinker" attack. I just want the best solution, period. So nice try.Originally posted by warrior-cat:
That strategy has failed and is making things worse. Yemen has helped prove that. How can anyone really defend Obama's position on this after that? Seriously, the only people who can are the koolaid drinkers and agenda driven lemmings. While our enemies around the world are terrorizing, raping, and killing people including American hostages, the clown in the white house is making silly videos trying to make fun of his critics while trying to save his legacy (Obamacare). These enemies are islamic and muslims so, call them what and who they are and deal with it. If you and Obama are afraid or in support of these idiots, step aside and let someone else lead.
The best solution has not been tried yet imo. Strike a nerve did I? It was by design. I said if you or Obama were afraid or in support. I seriously question his motives concerning this and the welfare of this nation. To me, anyone who supports his position on this is either in line with his stance (which is completely wrong) or truly ignorant to what is going on and I don't mean that as an insult. That last part simply means that people really cannot see the harm in his strategy here. Again, appeasment never works in the real world.Originally posted by Big_Blue79:
IDGAF if it's Obama, Bush, Ronald Reagan's ghost, Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter, you, me, or The Gimp from Pulp Fiction, so save the "koolaid drinker" attack. I just want the best solution, period. So nice try.Originally posted by warrior-cat:
That strategy has failed and is making things worse. Yemen has helped prove that. How can anyone really defend Obama's position on this after that? Seriously, the only people who can are the koolaid drinkers and agenda driven lemmings. While our enemies around the world are terrorizing, raping, and killing people including American hostages, the clown in the white house is making silly videos trying to make fun of his critics while trying to save his legacy (Obamacare). These enemies are islamic and muslims so, call them what and who they are and deal with it. If you and Obama are afraid or in support of these idiots, step aside and let someone else lead.
And screw you for even insinuating I support terrorists, btw. I kept a civil tone and asked questions, you lobbed personal insults. Truly a warrior move. I'm done with this conversation.
Heh I saw the same stuff circulating. Whats it even based on?Originally posted by Willy4UK:
Apparently, according to Facebook moms of America, the anti-christ the new leader of Greece.
After reflection and sobering up (one too many last night) I must apologize for insinuating you siding with terrorist. I do not believe you would and it was a stupid comment. I do however believe that Obama really does not have a clue as to how to proceed. I have very strong feelings for this country and fear for her status going forward. Mine is a position defensive in nature and somtimes comes on too strong.IDGAF if it's Obama, Bush, Ronald Reagan's ghost, Abraham Lincoln Vampire Huntet, you, me, or The Gimp from Pulp Fiction, so save the "koolaid drinker" attack. I just want the best solution, period. So nice try.
And screw you for even insinuating I support terrorists, btw. I kept a civil tone and asked questions, you lobbed personal insults. Truly a warrior move I'm done with this conversation.
To prove our xenophobia.Originally posted by WayneDougan:
Is there anything more pointless than arguing over whether the dude who shot the UNC students committed a hate crime? He's never going to step foot outside of prison for the rest of his life. In the words of Hillary Clinton, "what difference does it make" whether he killed them over parking or because they were Muslims.
I don't know the full scoop on it, but it has to with that leader meeting all the criteria for the anti-Christ. Christian moms are outraged!!!Originally posted by bigblueinsanity:
Heh I saw the same stuff circulating. Whats it even based on?Originally posted by Willy4UK:
Apparently, according to Facebook moms of America, the anti-christ the new leader of Greece.
I have no clue. Don't know anything about him other than he is an Atheist and now is being hailed as the devil reincarnate.Originally posted by Bill Cosby:
How is Tsipras any different than 90% of American liberals? Other than the fact that he leads Greece.
Don't forget the massive amounts of tax fraud Obama has unlocked for illegals! Now with Obama issued SS#'s, illegals can not only file taxes, THEY CAN FILE BACK TAXES AS WELL! And thanks to EITC welfare program, can get tens of thousands in free Obama money! Hell fire, this deal is so fracked up illegals are gonna be claiming their children back home in Mexico or Guatemala or El Salvadore as being US dependents.Originally posted by Bill Cosby:
Good to see the Secretaries of State of various states testifying to Congress that Obama's excutive dictate of amnesty will bring in a new era of unchecked voter fraud.
But, I'm sure again we'll hear from Defense and the rest of the lefty dipshits on here that voter fraud doesn't actually exist.
I'm waiting for those that attacked the "community organizer" to start defending the "warranty salesman".Originally posted by Catfan in Tn.:
Howard Dean saying that he questions Scott Walker's ability to be President because he didn't graduate from College. He has proven he is more than qualified to be a Governor without a College Degree. It only disqualifies him from being President in the eyes of certain Democrats.
I think the real issue with Scott Walker is not so much his lack of a bachelors degree, but rather how frequently he repeats his desire of returning to college for degree completion. Walker dropped out his senior year at Marquette. People grow tired of the rhetoric because numerous options exist and have been out there for many, many years. Coincidentally, Arnold Schwarzenegger completed his own undergrad degree via correspondence from University of Wisconsin-Stout in 1979.Originally posted by Catfan in Tn.:
Howard Dean saying that he questions Scott Walker's ability to be President because he didn't graduate from College. He has proven he is more than qualified to be a Governor without a College Degree. It only disqualifies him from being President in the eyes of certain Democrats.
You aren't going to have to hope, it's as sure as the sun rising going to be a thread they pile on with him. And it's going to be hilarious.Originally posted by Bill Cosby:
I really hope if Walker is running for President, the left harps on how much of an idiot and a loser he is because he didn't go to a fancy college.