***Political Thread*** (Massive merge)

Status
Not open for further replies.

qwesley

New member
Feb 5, 2003
17,606
3,810
0
Originally posted by Big_Blue79:

And no f'ing way you guys believe there are no moderate Muslims fighting against terrorist organizations, right? You have to know that's just a ridiculous assertion. I simply cannot believe that living, breathing people actually believe that there is a dearth of moderate Muslims taking action, speaking out, etc... when we live in an age of Google and access to news from around the world. But that's just me talking after doing < 5 minutes of simple searching.
Pakistan is the shining example of your simplistic skewed rationalization.

This post was edited on 2/11 10:50 AM by qwesley
 

warrior-cat

Well-known member
Oct 22, 2004
190,055
4,586
113
Originally posted by Big_Blue79:
"I am extremely skeptical that calling terrorists Islamic extremists (or Islamic terrorists or whatever) will push moderate Muslims to "take a stand and stop the madness." I think it would have the opposite (if any) effect. Most violence committed by these terrorist groups is against other Muslims. So how is the president saying "Islamic terrorists" the tipping point? Hey, I know you raped and tortured and killed, but NOW I AM READY TO FIGHT BECAUSE PRESIDENT OBAMA CALLED THEM ISLAMIC EXTREMISTS! The argument is not at all compelling. And again, it plays right into the what ISIL and al-Qaeda want. They want it to be the West against Islam."
As I said and you have kind of prove my point. The only time these "moderate muslims" take a stand is when it is being done to them. Outside of that, they sing in the streets when it happens to us.

The president calling them "Islamic Terrorist" is not the tipping point but, it goes a long way in facing the facts for what they are.
 

qwesley

New member
Feb 5, 2003
17,606
3,810
0
40% of British Muslims would prefer Sharia Law for their country.
45% of British Muslims believe that 9/11 was conspiracy b/w the US and Israel

Those are the ones not living in the more fundamentalist ME.
 

qwesley

New member
Feb 5, 2003
17,606
3,810
0
Article from Forbes on the possible effect ending long-term unemployment insurance had on the data (similar to the energy policy):
Unemployment Is Dropping, Thanks To A Republican Policy In January, in his annual State of the Union address, President Obama bragged that "our economy is growing and creating jobs at the fastest pace since 1999." It's great news, to be sure. But according to a new paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research, the recent improvement in the labor market may be due to a policy change that Obama adamantly opposed: ending extended unemployment benefits.[/I]
This post was edited on 2/11 12:01 PM by qwesley

forbes
 

qwesley

New member
Feb 5, 2003
17,606
3,810
0
Originally posted by Mojocat:
if only the shooter had been a conservative, the truth could've been told. Somethings never change......
Like the guy who killed people at the DC family group because he was mad at Chick Fil-A and the OWS guys that were caught planning to blow up bridges and the GOP convention, he will be forgotten very quickly.

This post was edited on 2/11 1:34 PM by qwesley
 

JHB4UK

New member
May 29, 2001
31,836
2,637
0
Originally posted by Deeeefense:
Well I guess that proves what we all have been suspecting - Rachel Maddow, the Huffington Post and Bill Nye the Science Guy hate Muslims!

Neil deGrasse Tyson? Seriously?
Facts are facts on how such tragedies are treated by the media. When James Holmes shot up the Colorado theater a national media member's first reaction was to do a name search of local Tea Party members to find a match. And then even worst was the leap to judgement, instantly, after the Gabby Giffords mass shooting.

Tea Parties!
Palin's gunsights!
 

qwesley

New member
Feb 5, 2003
17,606
3,810
0
Originally posted by JHB4UK: Facts are facts on how such tragedies are treated by the media. When James Holmes shot up the Colorado theater a national media member's first reaction was to do a name search of local Tea Party members to find a match. And then even worst was the leap to judgement, instantly, after the Gabby Giffords mass shooting.

Tea Parties!
Palin's gunsights!
Yesterday, after we find out the UNC shooter was a liberal atheist and had several run-ins about parking with the victims, their friend goes on CNN and blames the shooting on Fox and Bobby Jindal hate toward Muslims. Ishitunot.

Sounds as reasonable as some arguments we see on here.
 

dezyDeco

New member
Nov 9, 2014
7,658
879
0
Originally posted by qwesley:

Originally posted by JHB4UK:
Facts are facts on how such tragedies are treated by the media. When James Holmes shot up the Colorado theater a national media member's first reaction was to do a name search of local Tea Party members to find a match. And then even worst was the leap to judgement, instantly, after the Gabby Giffords mass shooting.

Tea Parties!
Palin's gunsights!
Yesterday, after we find out the UNC shooter was a liberal atheist and had several run-ins about parking with the victims, their friend goes on CNN and blames the shooting on Fox and Bobby Jindal hate toward Muslims. Ishitunot.

Sounds as reasonable as some arguments we see on here.
As ridiculous as it is, it's actually more reasonable than most of the Lib-Dem arguments on here.
 

Big_Blue79

New member
Apr 2, 2004
52,487
846
0
Originally posted by qwesley:

Originally posted by P19978:

Originally posted by Big_Blue79:

Plenty to criticize the president for without reaching, imho.
Truer words were never spoken.
Yep, except he never does it. Ironic.
1. I have.
2. The entirety of my political expression does not consist of The Paddock. Nor are my posts here a comprehensive outlook of all things political. See 3.
3. Paddock skews heavily conservative, and I pick and choose the issues I discuss. So I could be the 1000th to argue with Deefense or CardKilla or whoever, or engage in selected discussions with the other 85%. I have neither the time nor the inclination to engage in every topic, sorry.
 

Big_Blue79

New member
Apr 2, 2004
52,487
846
0
Originally posted by warrior-cat:
Originally posted by Big_Blue79:
"I am extremely skeptical that calling terrorists Islamic extremists (or Islamic terrorists or whatever) will push moderate Muslims to "take a stand and stop the madness." I think it would have the opposite (if any) effect. Most violence committed by these terrorist groups is against other Muslims. So how is the president saying "Islamic terrorists" the tipping point? Hey, I know you raped and tortured and killed, but NOW I AM READY TO FIGHT BECAUSE PRESIDENT OBAMA CALLED THEM ISLAMIC EXTREMISTS! The argument is not at all compelling. And again, it plays right into the what ISIL and al-Qaeda want. They want it to be the West against Islam."
As I said and you have kind of prove my point. The only time these "moderate muslims" take a stand is when it is being done to them. Outside of that, they sing in the streets when it happens to us.

The president calling them "Islamic Terrorist" is not the tipping point but, it goes a long way in facing the facts for what they are.
~ 1.6 billion Muslims in the world. Maybe painting with such a broad brush isn't helpful. The reality is that there are way too many Muslims that are sympathetic towards terrorist groups. And there are also many (anywhere from the vast majority to a majority... give or take some because polls vary wildly by region, question, and when the survey is taken) that abhor and reject the hijacking of their religion. Similar to my disgust with groups like Westboro Baptist (not equating the two, so everyone calm down... I know how the Paddock works ;)). Speaking in these absolutes, besides being literally untrue, I'm just not sure how it's supposed to accomplish anything. It's great AM radio (and I guess Internet message board) fodder.

Again, I disagree that the president calling them Islamic terrorists does anything helpful. Okay, so you "fac[e] facts." Now what? "Hey, moderates, your religion is terrorism" doesn't seem like a great way to engage. Islamic is literally what the terrorists want to be perceived as, and it provides a facade (however fake) of legitimacy. Removing their attempted legitimacy and exposing them for the cowardly murderers that they are seems like a far better strategy. I really just don't understand the desire of so many to make this a religious war (a Crusdade?).
 

warrior-cat

Well-known member
Oct 22, 2004
190,055
4,586
113
Z
Originally posted by Big_Blue79:

Originally posted by warrior-cat:
Originally posted by Big_Blue79:
"I am extremely skeptical that calling terrorists Islamic extremists (or Islamic terrorists or whatever) will push moderate Muslims to "take a stand and stop the madness." I think it would have the opposite (if any) effect. Most violence committed by these terrorist groups is against other Muslims. So how is the president saying "Islamic terrorists" the tipping point? Hey, I know you raped and tortured and killed, but NOW I AM READY TO FIGHT BECAUSE PRESIDENT OBAMA CALLED THEM ISLAMIC EXTREMISTS! The argument is not at all compelling. And again, it plays right into the what ISIL and al-Qaeda want. They want it to be the West against Islam."
As I said and you have kind of prove my point. The only time these "moderate muslims" take a stand is when it is being done to them. Outside of that, they sing in the streets when it happens to us.

The president calling them "Islamic Terrorist" is not the tipping point but, it goes a long way in facing the facts for what they are.
~ 1.6 billion Muslims in the world. Maybe painting with such a broad brush isn't helpful. The reality is that there are way too many Muslims that are sympathetic towards terrorist groups. And there are also many (anywhere from the vast majority to a majority... give or take some because polls vary wildly by region, question, and when the survey is taken) that abhor and reject the hijacking of their religion. Similar to my disgust with groups like Westboro Baptist (not equating the two, so everyone calm down... I know how the Paddock works ;)). Speaking in these absolutes, besides being literally untrue, I'm just not sure how it's supposed to accomplish anything. It's great AM radio (and I guess Internet message board) fodder.

Again, I disagree that the president calling them Islamic terrorists does anything helpful. Okay, so you "fac[e] facts." Now what? "Hey, moderates, your religion is terrorism" doesn't seem like a great way to engage. Islamic is literally what the terrorists want to be perceived as, and it provides a facade (however fake) of legitimacy. Removing their attempted legitimacy and exposing them for the cowardly murderers that they are seems like a far better strategy. I really just don't understand the desire of so many to make this a religious war (a Crusdade?).
That strategy has failed and is making things worse. Yemen has helped prove that. How can anyone really defend Obama's position on this after that? Seriously, the only people who can are the koolaid drinkers and agenda driven lemmings. While our enemies around the world are terrorizing, raping, and killing people including American hostages, the clown in the white house is making silly videos trying to make fun of his critics while trying to save his legacy (Obamacare). These enemies are islamic and muslims so, call them what and who they are and deal with it. If you and Obama are afraid or in support of these idiots, step aside and let someone else lead.
 

Big_Blue79

New member
Apr 2, 2004
52,487
846
0
Originally posted by warrior-cat:

That strategy has failed and is making things worse. Yemen has helped prove that. How can anyone really defend Obama's position on this after that? Seriously, the only people who can are the koolaid drinkers and agenda driven lemmings. While our enemies around the world are terrorizing, raping, and killing people including American hostages, the clown in the white house is making silly videos trying to make fun of his critics while trying to save his legacy (Obamacare). These enemies are islamic and muslims so, call them what and who they are and deal with it. If you and Obama are afraid or in support of these idiots, step aside and let someone else lead.
IDGAF if it's Obama, Bush, Ronald Reagan's ghost, Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter, you, me, or The Gimp from Pulp Fiction, so save the "koolaid drinker" attack. I just want the best solution, period. So nice try.

And screw you for even insinuating I support terrorists, btw. I kept a civil tone and asked questions, you lobbed personal insults. Truly a warrior move. I'm done with this conversation.
 

warrior-cat

Well-known member
Oct 22, 2004
190,055
4,586
113
Originally posted by Big_Blue79:

Originally posted by warrior-cat:

That strategy has failed and is making things worse. Yemen has helped prove that. How can anyone really defend Obama's position on this after that? Seriously, the only people who can are the koolaid drinkers and agenda driven lemmings. While our enemies around the world are terrorizing, raping, and killing people including American hostages, the clown in the white house is making silly videos trying to make fun of his critics while trying to save his legacy (Obamacare). These enemies are islamic and muslims so, call them what and who they are and deal with it. If you and Obama are afraid or in support of these idiots, step aside and let someone else lead.
IDGAF if it's Obama, Bush, Ronald Reagan's ghost, Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter, you, me, or The Gimp from Pulp Fiction, so save the "koolaid drinker" attack. I just want the best solution, period. So nice try.

And screw you for even insinuating I support terrorists, btw. I kept a civil tone and asked questions, you lobbed personal insults. Truly a warrior move. I'm done with this conversation.
The best solution has not been tried yet imo. Strike a nerve did I? It was by design. I said if you or Obama were afraid or in support. I seriously question his motives concerning this and the welfare of this nation. To me, anyone who supports his position on this is either in line with his stance (which is completely wrong) or truly ignorant to what is going on and I don't mean that as an insult. That last part simply means that people really cannot see the harm in his strategy here. Again, appeasment never works in the real world.
 
Jan 28, 2007
20,400
984
0
Is there anything more pointless than arguing over whether the dude who shot the UNC students committed a hate crime? He's never going to step foot outside of prison for the rest of his life. In the words of Hillary Clinton, "what difference does it make" whether he killed them over parking or because they were Muslims.
 

warrior-cat

Well-known member
Oct 22, 2004
190,055
4,586
113
IDGAF if it's Obama, Bush, Ronald Reagan's ghost, Abraham Lincoln Vampire Huntet, you, me, or The Gimp from Pulp Fiction, so save the "koolaid drinker" attack. I just want the best solution, period. So nice try.

And screw you for even insinuating I support terrorists, btw. I kept a civil tone and asked questions, you lobbed personal insults. Truly a warrior move I'm done with this conversation.
After reflection and sobering up (one too many last night) I must apologize for insinuating you siding with terrorist. I do not believe you would and it was a stupid comment. I do however believe that Obama really does not have a clue as to how to proceed. I have very strong feelings for this country and fear for her status going forward. Mine is a position defensive in nature and somtimes comes on too strong.
 

qwesley

New member
Feb 5, 2003
17,606
3,810
0
Originally posted by WayneDougan:

Is there anything more pointless than arguing over whether the dude who shot the UNC students committed a hate crime? He's never going to step foot outside of prison for the rest of his life. In the words of Hillary Clinton, "what difference does it make" whether he killed them over parking or because they were Muslims.
To prove our xenophobia.
 

Bill Cosby

New member
May 1, 2008
29,258
4,225
0
Good to see the Secretaries of State of various states testifying to Congress that Obama's excutive dictate of amnesty will bring in a new era of unchecked voter fraud.



But, I'm sure again we'll hear from Defense and the rest of the lefty dipshits on here that voter fraud doesn't actually exist.
 

UKserialkiller

New member
Dec 13, 2009
34,297
35,841
0
Originally posted by bigblueinsanity:

Originally posted by Willy4UK:
Apparently, according to Facebook moms of America, the anti-christ the new leader of Greece.
Heh I saw the same stuff circulating. Whats it even based on?
I don't know the full scoop on it, but it has to with that leader meeting all the criteria for the anti-Christ. Christian moms are outraged!!!
 

Bill Cosby

New member
May 1, 2008
29,258
4,225
0
How is Tsipras any different than 90% of American liberals? Other than the fact that he leads Greece.
 

UKserialkiller

New member
Dec 13, 2009
34,297
35,841
0
Originally posted by Bill Cosby:

How is Tsipras any different than 90% of American liberals? Other than the fact that he leads Greece.
I have no clue. Don't know anything about him other than he is an Atheist and now is being hailed as the devil reincarnate.
 

qwesley

New member
Feb 5, 2003
17,606
3,810
0
smgdmfh....


WASHINGTON (AP) - Hormone treatment for gender reassignment has been approved for Chelsea Manning, the former intelligence analyst convicted of espionage for sending classified documents to the WikiLeaks website.
 

JHB4UK

New member
May 29, 2001
31,836
2,637
0
Originally posted by Bill Cosby:

Good to see the Secretaries of State of various states testifying to Congress that Obama's excutive dictate of amnesty will bring in a new era of unchecked voter fraud.



But, I'm sure again we'll hear from Defense and the rest of the lefty dipshits on here that voter fraud doesn't actually exist.
Don't forget the massive amounts of tax fraud Obama has unlocked for illegals! Now with Obama issued SS#'s, illegals can not only file taxes, THEY CAN FILE BACK TAXES AS WELL! And thanks to EITC welfare program, can get tens of thousands in free Obama money! Hell fire, this deal is so fracked up illegals are gonna be claiming their children back home in Mexico or Guatemala or El Salvadore as being US dependents.

All about creating a whole new class of dependent Democrat voters, since the ones already here are not behaving as they should at the polls all the time.
 

Bill Cosby

New member
May 1, 2008
29,258
4,225
0
That's not even tax fraud. That's perfectly legal.



Edit: The tax filing part is perfectly legal. Who they claim as dependents may not be.
This post was edited on 2/13 8:58 AM by Bill Cosby
 

qwesley

New member
Feb 5, 2003
17,606
3,810
0
The Taliban, whom the WH has gone to great lengths to say are not a terrorist organization per se, bombed a Shiite mosque today in Pakistan killing 20+. Hopefully our non-labelling will win them over soon.
 

Catfan in Tn.

Well-known member
Mar 10, 2005
22,763
2,279
97
Howard Dean saying that he questions Scott Walker's ability to be President because he didn't graduate from College. He has proven he is more than qualified to be a Governor without a College Degree. It only disqualifies him from being President in the eyes of certain Democrats.
 

Bill Cosby

New member
May 1, 2008
29,258
4,225
0
I was thinking about that the other day.

Obama's only accomplishment was he went to a fancy college and law school. That was all he ever did other than getting elected to office.

He's been an utter failure as POTUS in every sense of the word. But by golly, he was the editor of the Havard Law Review.

Scott Walker on the other hand made something of himself in spite of not having a college degree.


I really hope if Walker is running for President, the left harps on how much of an idiot and a loser he is because he didn't go to a fancy college.
 

Deeeefense

Well-known member
Staff member
Aug 22, 2001
43,657
4,749
113
Originally posted by Catfan in Tn.:

Howard Dean saying that he questions Scott Walker's ability to be President because he didn't graduate from College. He has proven he is more than qualified to be a Governor without a College Degree. It only disqualifies him from being President in the eyes of certain Democrats.
I'm waiting for those that attacked the "community organizer" to start defending the "warranty salesman".
 

Catfan in Tn.

Well-known member
Mar 10, 2005
22,763
2,279
97
Joe Biden graduated from College. Anyone really think that makes him qualified to be President?
 

AustinTXCat

Well-known member
Jan 7, 2003
51,745
30,633
113
Originally posted by Catfan in Tn.:

Howard Dean saying that he questions Scott Walker's ability to be President because he didn't graduate from College. He has proven he is more than qualified to be a Governor without a College Degree. It only disqualifies him from being President in the eyes of certain Democrats.
I think the real issue with Scott Walker is not so much his lack of a bachelors degree, but rather how frequently he repeats his desire of returning to college for degree completion. Walker dropped out his senior year at Marquette. People grow tired of the rhetoric because numerous options exist and have been out there for many, many years. Coincidentally, Arnold Schwarzenegger completed his own undergrad degree via correspondence from University of Wisconsin-Stout in 1979.

To be fair, Walker is also a huge non-traditional education advocate, and has pushed distance learning initiatives through the University of Wisconsin system. He knows about available options, but appears too lazy to act, preferring instead to wait until the "right program comes along".
 

qwesley

New member
Feb 5, 2003
17,606
3,810
0
deeee showing his own hypocrisy whilst dogwhistling a false equivalent comp. (shocked face)

At least he has been minimized to these periodic one-liner + emoticon takes.
 

qwesley

New member
Feb 5, 2003
17,606
3,810
0
No reason for Walker not going back to get his degree over all these years. Fosho he will get plenty of vetting...WaPo had a long piece yesterday on his college years.

Just one of many pop-a-mole exercises we will see in the primary.
 

JHB4UK

New member
May 29, 2001
31,836
2,637
0
I was hired at my present employer 10 years ago this month, and said in the interview I fully intended on obtaining my MBA in the immediate future. Didn't happen, doesnt look like it will happen anytime soon. Hasn't harmed my career or progress here.

Life happens, Walker not finishing a few hours his last year in college to get a piece of paper is the biggest of no big deals

might help him connect and relate better with all the working class/middle class whites who were turned off by Romney but equally repulsed by the modern Democrat party, and sat at home in 2012. Certainly moreso than The Queen Of Learjets and Chauffeured SUV's.
 

Rex Kwon Do

Active member
Oct 15, 2005
7,492
1,707
83
Originally posted by Bill Cosby:

I really hope if Walker is running for President, the left harps on how much of an idiot and a loser he is because he didn't go to a fancy college.
You aren't going to have to hope, it's as sure as the sun rising going to be a thread they pile on with him. And it's going to be hilarious.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.