POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat_rivals185207
- Start date
He probably doesn’t want to get shot by some nut job from his own party
Libs find the weirdest, dumbest things to criticize their political opponents for:
I can't believe NBC is actually doing some reporting on the border
Absolutely. Never let a Liberal fool you. They are globalists, all of them.......And the rich ones make more and more money the more idiots they can get to carry out their agenda.
I see continuing news reports of tsa and air traffic people calling out. In sure that's union driven bs to put pressure on pubs to fold.
They should all just be fired
They should all just be fired
Holy Ronald Reagan, Batman!
Wow
Support for ICE is happening
Support for ICE is happening
Yes, a Lib hedging answer to a question is typical understandable by them.
Long story short: In the first century, the “Synagogue of Satan” had reference to Jews who persecuted Christians that had been born Jews. (Converted from Judaism to Christianity).
Revelation is an “end times” prophecy. That means that in our day (the end), the “Synagogue of Satan” includes people who profess to be Christians but aren’t really. (They persecute actual Christians)
Probably good to remember that only a relatively small group survive all this and the majority of all religion worldwide is about to be destroyed by the UN.
Heh heh. Only in the old country, I tell ya.
Putting the hammer down on Jasmine Crockett 
Can't wait to see the lib spin on how our President accomplished this peace deal, AND bringing hostages home.
Last edited:
Read about a couple of great loony liberal conspiracy theories this morning.
Trump and MAGA is secretly funding Hamas and they are being used by Trump so can win the Nobel Peace Prize.
Border crossing are down to all time low right only because immigrants have figured out America is now a s__thole under Trump and they don't even want to live here anymore.
Trump and MAGA is secretly funding Hamas and they are being used by Trump so can win the Nobel Peace Prize.
Border crossing are down to all time low right only because immigrants have figured out America is now a s__thole under Trump and they don't even want to live here anymore.
If you're habitually calling out sick when you aren't, you should be fired imo.
Yeah, I remember when President Reagan put hammer down on ATCs
Trump just said “Nancy doesnt look too good, I’m not sure what happened to Nancy.”
He’s having the time of his life…..and he deserves it.
He’s having the time of his life…..and he deserves it.
Trump and Vance on Schumer's statement:
Kind of like Jay Cutler did to be a starter again in Chicago? He became a better game manager until he decided to regress into his former catastrophe. These guys are what they are by now. Winston only has so much of an upside in Cindy's offense. It's not built for his type of play, and everything in the NFL is built on thin margins.
Is the Cincy offense too dependent on a pocket passer? Yes, it probably is.
But that's a totally different question, and it's not really possible to retool the entire offense right now. The roster size alone doesn't allow that. A college roster might given that it can have 2x the personnel.
Flacco makes the most sense, even if he too winds up injured in the process. Russel Wilson, if he wasn't also in the same mold as Browning, might be better, but he didn't prove that last season. That **** is hard. Putting it all together is hard. I can see why the coach isn't letting go of his offense, though. They were 2 plays or 2 penalties from winning a SB with it.
In his mind they're probably thinking "we just need to win enough games to get us into the playoffs with a healthy Joe Burrow, and keep getting good reps in the offense we need to almost win a SB.
I don't play fantasy football, though, so how well I know football probably doesn't matter much.
As I said a week ago about a different foot in mouth episode by a liberal dolt.....just when you think liberals have exhausted all of their BS rhetoric, along comes another shining star. Unbelievable.
So get a real judge to issue a cease and desist or gag order on politicians encouraging these felonies under threat of direct prosecution if they continue. If they really want to stop it.
If those things are actually felonies, then why haven't they arrested the people who are behind sanctuary cities? What the **** are they waiting for? Issue ACTUAL subpoenas and arrest them either when they show up or when they don't. NOT this congressional grandstanding bull****, but real criminal court or military court subpoenas for real and public proceedings.
I'm beyond tired of the theatrical bull****. F****** DO something of legitimate legal value in this regard for this country and end the useless back and forth. If there are ckear felonies, prosecute them. I don't want to see another congressional hearing
Count Chuckula has always been evil. Glad he's finally going on the record with it.
Unfortunately, I know that spot very well.
My friend wrote or is writing a book or a chalter of it about that very question. I was helping him edit it here and there until I got too busy. Do you want the long version or the short of it?
I've tried to cut down some of it into chunks without losing the reasoning as to why it points to whom it points. I think he won't mind (mea culpa if not)-
"
How we identify to which community this points is through the mention of "ten days" "that ye may be tried."
For such a trial period to be mentioned in this context it must be severe, as no other community has a tribulation period mentioned. The only one that has a very clear prophetic period of "ten days" or ten actual years of the most dire persecution comes under Diocletian in the 4th century. Here a very clear 10 year reign of terror is to be found.
Along with that mention of a tribulation is a mention of the "synagogue of Satan" and people "claiming to be Judeans" but "they are not." The language used refers to faithful believers in Christ as "Judeans," which makes sense from John's perspective being a "Judean" himself. The timing of the persecution is critical in determining who these false Judeans were.
It is mentioned before the persecution, which comes before Christianity becomes the official religion of Rome (303-313AD). So it can't (or doesn't seem) refer to those Romans who pretended to be Christians (after 323AD), but still were clinging to pagan customs, gods, and practices. It must instead refer to those who, like their predecessors, condemned Christ, and hunted his followers down far and wide."
"... We have to look at the words of Jesus referring to Satan and the devil for greatest clarity..."
He lists
Matthew 16 and 23 (child of hell), Mark 4, John 8 (murderer, father of lies),
"....Jesus is equating the desires and acts of Satan with those who emulate them. Because of their actions they are called sons or children of the devil. The devil in these verses snatches the Word of truth from them, whether that word is a commandment, a good work, some bit of wisdom, or anything that gives glory to God or reveals His existence to them."
He goes into the evidence of this and follows it up with-
"..... they used the secular authorities against Christians. When it is said that Diocletian surrounded himself with those who hated Christians, it should be readily apparent to whom that refers."
Then he goes on to talk about the Herodian Dynasty being one of mixed Judean, Roman, and Edomite lineage.... Herod being someone that was also clearly not considered "Judean" by John the Baptist or anyone considered a follower of Christ in the New Testament. More of a "false Judean"
If you didn't really want an answer, lol, sorry
Yes! Those are "fishing spots" where a nearby cold spring keeps your beer ICE cold and NO ONE is going to disturb your peace
So what's the rod for then? Disguise why you're really there?