Like I've said many times. Most of Stoops' problems are a function of being a defensive-minded/DC coordinator HC at Kentucky. That, IMO, puts you behind the 8-ball from the start. Offense is exponentially more difficult to build and sustain than a defense. It makes sense then, that you need the guy that IS going to be here year in and year out, to be the lynchpin of that system.
I'm not saying you have to take a flyer on a radically different guy like Mumme (who DID know how to run an offense, but had none of the other skills a HC needs). It can be just about any system, as long as it is consistent, year after year after year.
It's a lot more important at a place like UK, than it is at powerhouse programs, where talent can sometimes overcome the need for in-house player development that is geared towards a system that they know will be the same in their junior year as it was when they first got here.
Just my 2 cents.
Our fanbase is sore as hell, watching what Cignetti is doing at IU, and thinking, "How can effing Indiana do it and we can't?"
Look at Cignetti's background, and which side of the ball he specializes in...
Look at Brohm/UL
Look at MOST coaches that have success at programs that are not "traditional" powers...
This is also why I don't agree with the Jon Sumrall worship. I don't think he'd be a good hire for Kentucky.