Toggle sidebar

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • Total voters
    0
  • Poll closed .
V

vhcat1970

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2025
1,882
1,328
113
TeamAmerica said:
The problem with that is if you took a poll of UK fans 80% would say fund basketball over football.
Click to expand...
I know. Way more fired up about a practice hoops game than a real football game.

Which is why we continue to short shrift FB. It's killing the goose for the golden egg. Not at all smart by the fans and the admin that gives them what they want. Sad. I mean do we have the dumbest fans in major college sports? How can they not see this long-term, ongoing problem?
 
  • Like
Reactions: TeamAmerica
notFromhere

notFromhere

Heisman
Sep 7, 2016
21,022
63,049
113
HymanKaplan said:
I've made my preference known. I think we need a OC head coach, preferably one with a QB's coach background. A good play designer, that can find ways to exploit a defense, even when you're perhaps a little over-matched. Someone that knows how to take what the defense is giving you, and is not afraid to continue exploiting that, until the defense is forced to change, then you attack what they just conceded. It sounds simplistic, but it's not really rocket science, now is it?

I think that is what frustrates me the MOST about Stoops and Hamden. We get a groove running the ball, we're moving the chains, and then, for no good reason, we decide to get fancy, and boom, it's second and 10, and we're already behind the 8-ball. Even though the opposing defense had not adjusted yet to STOP the run. It's like Hamden gets BORED, and wants to play with a different toy, just because.
Click to expand...

EXACTLY.

LACK.OF.DISCIPLINE.

You take what the defense is giving you until the defense stops giving you that. Then you take what they expose on the change. You can't be too system dependent, but you also can't break discipline when the defense hasn't changed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheFrontRunner, ScrewDuke1, Simple Man and 4 others
notFromhere

notFromhere

Heisman
Sep 7, 2016
21,022
63,049
113
If you read aboutthe industry of shots and what constitutes an "effective" one is, they spell it out point blank- an effective shot is one that causes an immune response. If you don't have an immune response then you didn't get an effective shot. Might as well have been putting saline in your arm, if there's no immune response.

No injection site pain? No flu like symptoms? Well, then guess what? Your shot didn't do anything it was supposed to do and therefore was inneffective/of no value to you.

If you could read the number of articles and studies I read pre, during, and post-plandemic, you'd see that physicians complained for years about the effectiveness of the flu shots BECAUSE there was no immune response among those getting them. At best, one proponent of the yearly flu shots said they were 25% effective in a good year when they correctly predicted the right strains that would be prevalent. The years they did not accurately predict the strains, they were less than 9% (and according to the data he was being generous).

The "protection" they offer is questionable at best. There is ONLY correlation and no proof of causation. There have been no pbjective, scientific studies that prove they work.

If someone hadn't deleted my long-winded and detailed posts about thos during the plandemic, I could refer you to them and the links I provided to the studies, the cdc data, and the articles in AP and other news groups addressing it. It's up to you to do that for yourself now. Not that you'd believe it even if a Pfizer CEO told it to you directly, because it's clear that's not possible for most people.

You choose what you want to believe and act accordingly. At least you were given the information. That's all anyone can do.

Btw- list for me the studies that prove they prevent the flu. Should be tons out there that don't disregard data, that are true double blind tests against inert placebos. Since 1986 there should be endless studies of that sort
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: Lost In FL, berniecarbo and Joe-King
J

Joe-King

All-Conference
Sep 18, 2025
279
1,925
93
Demorats keep saying it's the GOP keeping the shutdown going. Can somebody please tell them all 53 GOP senators voted YES. It takes 60 votes to pass which means 7 demorats have to vote for it to pass, they will not. Oh, BTW the bill that's up for vote is the one Schumer wrote in September of last year, the very same.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vhcat1970, Col. Angus, Tinker Dan and 5 others
Monday Nitro

Monday Nitro

All-Conference
Jul 3, 2025
763
1,712
92
What a petulant little child. This guy couldn't even interview at a Hyundai dealership and get the job. (Unless they wanted to spy on him).

Swalwell demands 2028 Dem candidates vow to destroy Trump's White House ballroom project​

California Democrat wants future presidential nominees to destroy $250M addition on day one​

 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: gollumcat, notFromhere, Lost In FL and 1 other person
L

Lost In FL

Heisman
Oct 5, 2001
20,194
69,086
113
MiloJanus said:
Trump is probably the most intriguing international figure since Jesus was invented. The absolute and total devotion people show to him is legendary. If he could get it up (we all know he can’t ) and plowed lost in FL’s wife, he’d become a legend on this board. Warriorcat would jerk off even more to him, if that’s even possible. And the fckrunner would lose his mind. And I can’t even speculate on how out of his mind Hyman would be. Dude would edge himself for a year.
Click to expand...
awww poor miloanus. does it still bother you that your wife and her boyfriend get lost in calling my name when she takes it like a warrior right in frontrunner of you? when her i've asked them to stop and be easier on her hy***, ... you know, that thing... well, you probably don't know...but she can splain it to you
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: HymanKaplan, Joe-King, TheFrontRunner and 2 others
L

Lost In FL

Heisman
Oct 5, 2001
20,194
69,086
113
berniecarbo said:
Psychotherapist Reveals the Politically Incorrect Reason Why the Silly "No Kings" Rallies Mostly Consisted of 'Educated' White Women (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Cullen Linebarger
Click to expand...
From Coffee & Covid on 18 Oct ...
I do think they should be more specific. For one thing, surely not all kings are bad. If we depose the Burger King, who will stop the Hamburglar? Personally, I could live without Stephen King, but I also say “live and let live.” Good luck to him, I say. Let him babble about his loony liberal ideas and abuse adjectives all he wants. Don’t cancel him, for Pete Buttigieg’s sake.

Having invested more time than I care to admit studying this silly protest, investigating George Soros’s funding trail, wondering about foreign coordination, and so on, I’ve come to understand one thing. “No Kings” is not a normal protest. There’s no particular policy or position they oppose or want changed. It’s just a big tent for anyone who doesn’t like Trump to enjoy a day of raging against the Trump machine.

It’s the All-Protest! Come one, come all! Every progressive complaint welcome!

No Kings is less like a protest and more like an emotional clearinghouse for generalized Trump resentment. There’s no legislative demand, no policy plank, not even a unifying grievance beyond “Trump = bad.” It’s the political version of primal scream therapy — catharsis through ‘collective activism.’

In other words, it’s group therapy cosplaying as democracy. They should call it a mental health session. Instead of protest signs, they should hand out clipboards, mood surveys, and those folding paper crowns that Burger King gives out for kids’ fast-food birthday parties.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: berniecarbo, Joe-King and Simple Man
L

Lost In FL

Heisman
Oct 5, 2001
20,194
69,086
113
Here is the whole article. Great read. Some Epstein news that i hadn't heard previously as well.

enjoy
www.coffeeandcovid.com

☕️ YOUR MOMMA ☙ Saturday, October 18, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠

It’s No Kings day; amorphous protests; Epstein fallout topples UK royalty; Russiagate links emerge; Bolton indicted; Smartmatic hit for bribery; Admin goes full Coffee & Covid, mocking wokescolds.
www.coffeeandcovid.com www.coffeeandcovid.com
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joe-King, berniecarbo, ScrewDuke1 and 1 other person
M

Marley2

All-Conference
Dec 30, 2024
491
2,694
93
notFromhere said:
The CDC flu data shows that the flu shot and resulting shedding is more than likely the cause of many "flu" cases. The spikes also tend to occur after jab campaigns get underway, and would likely be seen initially after health care providers get their mandated ones, which is occurring from this past week over the next two weeks. If it's read carefully, you can see increases in cases with the exact strains they put in them.
Click to expand...


Flu shot info.
Sources:
[1]cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.10…
[2]pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC34…
[3]pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29525279/
[4]medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
[5] a.co/d/0DwP3Ux
[6
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joe-King and Simple Man
M

Marley2

All-Conference
Dec 30, 2024
491
2,694
93
vhcat1970 said:
Tell me the absurdity. The only really low number(s) came during covid. Various years have different dominant flu strains that result in varying death numbers.

I'm not going down that rat hole. You can't even show what "real" studies are.
Click to expand...

Just posted some. If I knew how to attach twitter posts on here, I would. But, if you're truly curious, check out Alex berenson post about 3 or 4 days ago, with a subtweet with scientific sources linked.

Or Don't, and keep taking that rubbish yearly. IDC. lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joe-King, notFromhere, ScrewDuke1 and 1 other person
AustinTXCat

AustinTXCat

Hall of Famer
Jan 7, 2003
52,923
312,538
113
She also banned Burkha's

 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: vhcat1970, colonelcat78, Col. Angus and 11 others
M

Marley2

All-Conference
Dec 30, 2024
491
2,694
93
vhcat1970 said:
Thanks. You'd have to show the comparison in numbers of deaths to population for me to know that. I read like 7M covid deaths 2020-2022.

I was a kid so don't know/recall. Regardless, why do I need to tell you anything? If you have the answer, why not just please state it?
Click to expand...


Here you go. Basically covid had about 2.4 the deaths.

Comparison of Deaths per Capita: COVID-19 vs. 1957 Asian Flu PandemicTo compare the global death tolls per capita between the COVID-19 pandemic (2019–ongoing) and the 1957–1958 Asian Flu pandemic (caused by the H2N2 influenza virus), we use confirmed or estimated excess deaths divided by the relevant world population. Note that both pandemics have some uncertainty in totals due to underreporting, varying definitions of "excess" deaths, and historical data limitations. COVID-19 figures are confirmed deaths as of October 2025, while Asian Flu estimates are based on excess mortality models from historical records.Key DataPandemicTime PeriodEstimated/Confirmed Global DeathsRelevant World PopulationDeaths per Capita1957 Asian Flu1957–19591.1 million (excess deaths from respiratory causes; range: 0.7–1.5 million)2.85 billion (mid-1957)~39 per 100,000 (or 0.039%)COVID-192019–20257.1 million (confirmed; true toll likely higher, e.g., 18–28 million excess all-cause deaths in some estimates)7.8 billion (mid-2020)~91 per 100,000 (or 0.091%)Explanation and ComparisonDeaths per Capita Calculation:For the Asian Flu: ( \frac{1,100,000}{2,850,000,000} \approx 0.000386 ), or 38.6 per 100,000 people. This uses the 1957 world population, as the pandemic peaked that year.For COVID-19: ( \frac{7,100,000}{7,800,000,000} \approx 0.00091 ), or 91 per 100,000 people. This uses the 2020 world population, when the pandemic began and most deaths occurred (though the global population has grown to ~8.1 billion by 2025, the per capita rate would be slightly lower if using that figure).Direct Comparison: COVID-19 has caused roughly 2.4 times more deaths per capita than the Asian Flu, based on confirmed/excess figures. If using higher excess death estimates for COVID-19 (e.g., up to 28 million), the ratio rises to ~10 times higher. The Asian Flu was milder in case-fatality rate but struck a smaller, younger global population; COVID-19's impact was amplified by an older demographic and comorbidities in many regions.Contextual Factors:Scale and Severity: The Asian Flu killed ~1–2% of those infected and spread rapidly via air and sea travel, but vaccines were developed mid-outbreak. COVID-19 had a lower initial case-fatality rate (~1–3%) but overwhelmed healthcare systems due to its duration and variants.Data Notes: Asian Flu estimates come from modeled excess respiratory deaths (1957–1959 period). COVID-19 uses WHO-confirmed deaths as of October 15, 2025; excess all-cause estimates are higher but not universally agreed upon.Limitations: Per capita doesn't account for age-adjusted rates (Asian Flu hit younger people harder) or regional variations (e.g., higher COVID-19 rates in Europe/Latin America).This comparison highlights how population growth and improved surveillance inflate absolute numbers today, but per capita metrics reveal relative lethality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Simple Man and Joe-King
notFromhere

notFromhere

Heisman
Sep 7, 2016
21,022
63,049
113
Marley2 said:
Yes, you could. It was airborne. If you share an hvac system, you could have sat in your apartment the entire time and still got it. Good lord.
Click to expand...

This is the paradox.

Q- How does a virus survive sunlight and oxidation/ozone long enough to get into someone's house and make them sick?
A- It can't.

Q- What can cause the same symptoms as covid but can't be destroyed by sunlight nor oxidation/ozone?
A- Aerosolized metals/metal dust can cause the exact same symptoms as covid. Specifically barium, strontium, and aluminum that was showing up in random air quality testing from before Trump became president. It was widespread by the end of 2019.

You're 100% correct. People were getting sick with the same symptoms while in their homes and not having any contact with people, even while NOT sharing an HVAC system. I only know of a few that didn't get it while doing so. Some of those people had expensive air filtration systems and/or filters in place.

The truth is that we don't really know who actually HAD "covid" because the pcr protocol we used for 2 years was completely useless. The peer review showed definitively that the cycle rate alone was so high that the error rate for false positives was nearly 100% and the error rate for false negatives was around 75%, but the test ALSO could not distinguish BETWEEN coronaviruses. You could have had the common "cold" and barely a sniffle and tested positive.

Having the symptoms they say were due to covid is not the same thing as proving someone had covid. Using a testing protocol so flawed, you also cannot prove by it that someone had covid. Getting really sick and nearly dying because of delayed and poor treatment protocols, also does not prove you had covid.

These are all correlations but it may also be possible someone has had a "flu" or a chemical/metals poisoning incident.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vhcat1970, ScrewDuke1, Simple Man and 3 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom