This is for every idiot here who called what happened a murder. You know who you are.
I posted that earlier, and it illustrates my other point that you are "debating" people who are completely incapable of it (incompetence) or just completely dishonest (insincere, the ideology must survive above all else).
It's one the thing when it's just nameless avatars on the internet, but something else entirely when it's people in power and/or influence in media, losers like Frey and Kimble, promulgating this mass delusion for power and money.
He came around from the other side and you have to wonder how aware she was of him. Nevertheless, she backed up first and had to have seen him when she started forward.
Speaking of the devils; ole Fanon there tried to make the (regurgitated of course) "argument" that what other reason could she possibly have for backing up other than wanting to avoid the officer!!!???!!!???
Do you people even drive? Have you ever driven an SUV? She is in the middle of the road, perpendicular to it. She needs to back up because she doesn't have the turning radius to escape without doing so.
Which is all beside the point anyway (a straw man). Her intent doesn't matter; what matters is did the officer have reasonable fear of death or serious bodily injury, which of course he does. When "your" eyes (sambowie) tell you he doesn't, then you know for complete certainty that you've been had. They got you; you're their automaton. You are brainwashed.
Last edited: