POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!


  • Total voters
    0
  • Poll closed .

warrior-cat

Hall of Famer
Oct 22, 2004
191,082
153,181
113
What's logical about this when he started with the falsehood that she's a non-citizen?

"She’s a democrat, which means she’s a partisan. That’s self-explanatory. Good grief man, you’ve got to learn to read.
All he did here is state the obvious. How does that make him logical?

I haven’t made any mistake. The inherent implication here is that she should renounce her foreign citizenship.

Say she's a non-citizen isn't a mistake? That's logical? He can imply whatever, but that doesn't make it logical that she renounce her Lebanon citizenship? What's the logical legal basis for that?

As for a nativist, OF COURSE I AM. I want this country to be for Americans and our kids. We’re not a global economic zone.

So no immigration is logical when all but native Indians are descend from immigrants? What's the logic in that?

You are boomerized
"boomerized isn't even a word, so I guess that makes it logical Got it.
I
beyond much hope, I’m afraid. I know you’ve had it pounded into your head that being America first is nativist, or racist, or something.

Show where this supposed conclusion about me is logical. It's a rant not logic.

All I can tell you is: it turns out you were lied to and that you’re horrifically wrong."

He has no idea wth he's talking about, but it's logic to you. What it is is emotion. Sad.
I got stoned and I missed it, I got stoned and I missed it. I got stoned and it went right by eye eye.
 

Anon1751658263

All-Conference
Jul 4, 2025
831
3,787
93
Tell him the same thing when any friends family moves away.
Or when little Johnny's father was taken away for 4 years, held in solitary confinement, and denied medical treatment because he walked into the capital to protest one day. Funny how selective a Karen's feigned moral indignation is.
Leftists are as see through as jelly fish.
 

LineSkiCat14

Heisman
Aug 5, 2015
37,871
58,837
113
Thanks. Have you ever spoken with them about the non-assimilation issue of recent immigrants?

I haven't really. I try not to bring up politics. I should ask one day. But just from being around the one a lot, I can safely say that he's at worst, a moderate. These guys aren't likely going to be Trump fans, but they're against a lot of what the left stands for now. And I'd be surprised to hear them say they are "OK" with with mass illegal immigration.. but of course, I won't put words in their mouth. I dont really know.

What I do know, is just how different those Muslims are compared to the new ones I'm seeing.
 

tls

Heisman
Nov 7, 2007
7,749
14,279
81
They tell so many lies that nobody can properly rebut them. At least this is a start.

You guys on here who are big democrats (and you know who you are) ought to be at least a little bit smart enough to know that when you see the same old pieces of DC **** going after somebody like Hegseth, it’s not because he’s a crook like them.


Martha Raddatz .. The face that launched a thousand quips
 

HeismanWinner

All-Conference
Sep 12, 2025
818
2,495
93
Have you guys ever read how much of the Civil Rights Movement was pure theater? I learned about eight years ago how bogus the Rosa Parks story was as she was a secretary for the NAACP (which was created by Henry Moskowitz and Julius Rosenthal) who rode around for two weeks trying to make something happen as they already had the boycott pamphlets printed and had a previous woman who actually experienced it but she a pregnant unwed mother so they didn't want her for the movement. Back then, they had a flexible section for black/white so if more whites came, they would move the section back a row. Parks is in the middle and waits until eventually it gets full and refuses to move back a row and then sets off what we now know.

MLK's "I have a Dream" speech was crafted and outlined by his lawyer Clarence Jones and Stanley Levison (a former member of the Communist Party which JFK allegedly wanred King about). Feds spied on him like crazy as we know which is how we know of the surveillance of his orgies and the letter Hoover sent threatening him to leave public life via suicide.

But the James Earl Ray, lone gunman story-- I never heard this portion

  • Ray's "confession" was coerced: He pled guilty in '69 to dodge the chair, but recanted within days, claiming his lawyer Percy Foreman and the FBI twisted his arm with threats of a rigged trial. No cross-examination, no real defense—boom, case "closed." Ray spent the rest of his life yelling he was framed, and even the HSCA (1979) couldn't ignore the farce. Smells like the same rush job they pulled on Oswald.

  • Ballistics don't match—wrong gun, wrong shooter: The .30-06 Remington "found" next to the boarding house? FBI tests were inconclusive; it didn't definitively match the fatal bullet. Later probes (like Judge Joe Brown's on the appeals) pointed to two rifles involved, and Ray's fingerprints weren't even on the scope or bag properly. If Ray fired from that tiny bathroom window 200+ yards away, why's the physics off? Echoes of the JFK "magic bullet" nonsense—trajectory screams a second shooter from the bushes or a nearby building, covered up by Memphis PD (who had undercover assets on site).

  • The "Raoul" ghost and Ray's impossible timeline: Ray swore a mystery handler "Raoul" (or Raul) recruited him for a smuggling gig that morphed into the hit, then vanished him post-assassination. Raoul's name pops up in FBI agent Donald Wilson's seized papers from Ray's Mustang (hidden for 30 years, then "discovered" in '98), linking to mob and CIA-adjacent figures. Ray's brothers and Jowers backed it. But Raoul? Never found, description morphs every retelling. Ray, a Missouri con with no sharpshooting chops, suddenly globe-trots to Europe on a fake passport? Funded how? Smells like fed-planted misdirection to muddy the waters.

  • Motive? Ray was a racist drifter, not a King-obsessed assassin: Official line: Ray hated civil rights, supported Wallace. But he had zero personal beef with MLK—why Memphis, why that day? HSCA admitted he likely killed for a bounty (maybe $50K from St. Louis racists or mob), but traced no payout. Ray's own cellmate spilled to feds about an "assassination plot" chat, but it got buried. Compare to Oswald: no motive, just a convenient "lone nut" to shut down the real trail.

  • The bundle drop and planted evidence: That rifle-and-stuff bundle "dropped" in the bushes? Eyewitnesses saw multiple men fleeing the scene, not one. Landlady Bessie Brewer ID'd "John Willard" (Ray's alias) as shorter, younger—not matching Ray's mug. FBI "enhanced" photos and fingerprints to fit, but independents called fraud. And the Mustang? Abandoned with Ray's prints nowhere key—except where it suited the script.

Um you read this and you can't help but notice a few things regarding a recent assassination.
 
Last edited:

JumperJack.

Heisman
Jul 11, 2025
1,803
12,033
113
While I want to be clear that the moral underpinning of the Civil Rights Movement was correct, the tactics used by some of the leaders of that movement were anything but authentic. There’s a reason the U.S. government associated some of them with communists.

And there’s a reason these same tactics haven’t changed a lot: they have little to do with racial equality and a lot to do with redistribution of property.
 

TheFrontRunner

Hall of Famer
Jun 4, 2019
30,762
215,633
113



RNC CHAIR JOE GRUTERS: "Ballot stubs must match, and incomplete ballots cannot be counted."




 

notFromhere

Heisman
Sep 7, 2016
21,736
64,883
113
Have you guys ever read how much of the Civil Rights Movement was pure theater? I learned about eight years ago how bogus the Rosa Parks story was as she was a secretary for the NAACP (which was created by Henry Moskowitz and Julius Rosenthal) who rode around for two weeks trying to make something happen as they already had the boycott pamphlets printed and had a previous woman who actually experienced it but she a pregnant unwed mother so they didn't her for the movement. Back then, they had a flexible section for black/white so if more whites came, they would move the section back a row. Parks is in the middle and waits until eventually it gets full and refuses to move back a row.

Yep. From a friend of a friend whose family babysat MLKj kids when he was in KY.

MLK's "I have a Dream" speech was crafted and outlined by his lawyer Clarence Jones and Stanley Levison (a former member of the Communist Party which JFK allegedly wanred King about).

All except the "content of character" rather than "color of skin" which I think wasn't supposed to be in the speech but was added by MLKj.

...
But the James Earl Ray, lone gunman story-- I never heard this portion

  • Ray's "confession" was coerced: He pled guilty in '69 to dodge the chair, but recanted within days, claiming his lawyer Percy Foreman and the FBI twisted his arm with threats of a rigged trial. No cross-examination, no real defense—boom, case "closed." Ray spent the rest of his life yelling he was framed, and even the HSCA (1979) couldn't ignore the farce. Smells like the same rush job they pulled on Oswald.

  • Ballistics don't match—wrong gun, wrong shooter: The .30-06 Remington "found" next to the boarding house? FBI tests were inconclusive; it didn't definitively match the fatal bullet. Later probes (like Judge Joe Brown's on the appeals) pointed to two rifles involved, and Ray's fingerprints weren't even on the scope or bag properly. If Ray fired from that tiny bathroom window 200+ yards away, why's the physics off? Echoes of the JFK "magic bullet" nonsense—trajectory screams a second shooter from the bushes or a nearby building, covered up by Memphis PD (who had undercover assets on site).

  • The "Raoul" ghost and Ray's impossible timeline: Ray swore a mystery handler "Raoul" (or Raul) recruited him for a smuggling gig that morphed into the hit, then vanished him post-assassination. Raoul's name pops up in FBI agent Donald Wilson's seized papers from Ray's Mustang (hidden for 30 years, then "discovered" in '98), linking to mob and CIA-adjacent figures. Ray's brothers and Jowers backed it. But Raoul? Never found, description morphs every retelling. Ray, a Missouri con with no sharpshooting chops, suddenly globe-trots to Europe on a fake passport? Funded how? Smells like fed-planted misdirection to muddy the waters.

  • Motive? Ray was a racist drifter, not a King-obsessed assassin: Official line: Ray hated civil rights, supported Wallace. But he had zero personal beef with MLK—why Memphis, why that day? HSCA admitted he likely killed for a bounty (maybe $50K from St. Louis racists or mob), but traced no payout. Ray's own cellmate spilled to feds about an "assassination plot" chat, but it got buried. Compare to Oswald: no motive, just a convenient "lone nut" to shut down the real trail.

  • The bundle drop and planted evidence: That rifle-and-stuff bundle "dropped" in the bushes? Eyewitnesses saw multiple men fleeing the scene, not one. Landlady Bessie Brewer ID'd "John Willard" (Ray's alias) as shorter, younger—not matching Ray's mug. FBI "enhanced" photos and fingerprints to fit, but independents called fraud. And the Mustang? Abandoned with Ray's prints nowhere key—except where it suited the script.

Um you read this and you can't help but notice a few things regarding a recent assassination.

I heard portions of this over the years, but never seriously considered Ray the actual shooter. After what they did to the Kennedy boys, I never believed anything "official" when these things happened.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HeismanWinner

notFromhere

Heisman
Sep 7, 2016
21,736
64,883
113
This pi$$es me off. Am I wrong to be pissed off about this? Wtf

UK applied for a trademark on STEIN'S "Feed the Studs" phrase! Not Stein. UK applied for it. I think he should sue them for it, as he used this phrase for years before they even thought about putting their greedy little mitts on it.

I'm really angry about this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FireWentOut

notFromhere

Heisman
Sep 7, 2016
21,736
64,883
113
"Try not to be as weird and gay" - Gavin Newsom



He just admits outright that anything he's going to say is just for appearances. "We don't talk enough about _ X ___ ."

Meaning precisely- "We don't care enough about the people who are affected by _ X ___ , but we need to APPEAR to care about it."

He's a complete piece a work. Everything he says needs a truth translator and subtitles for the liberalism impaired.
 

TheFrontRunner

Hall of Famer
Jun 4, 2019
30,762
215,633
113
"NO ONE asked Trump to take up this task. Our region is far from the headlands. But when the president saw the opportunity to contribute to peace, he immediately took it."

Odd thing for Trump to do, considering he is a Nazi and worse than and Hitler and all.





"The biggest vote of thanks goes to President Donald Trump!"

"Trump is pragmatic!"

"NO ONE asked Trump to take up this task. Our region is far from the headlands. But when the president saw the opportunity to contribute to peace, he immediately took it."

"This conflict has lasted for 30 YEARS."
 

UKbrassowTipIn93

All-Conference
Jul 3, 2025
807
4,548
93
Have you guys ever read how much of the Civil Rights Movement was pure theater? I learned about eight years ago how bogus the Rosa Parks story was as she was a secretary for the NAACP (which was created by Henry Moskowitz and Julius Rosenthal) who rode around for two weeks trying to make something happen as they already had the boycott pamphlets printed and had a previous woman who actually experienced it but she a pregnant unwed mother so they didn't want her for the movement. Back then, they had a flexible section for black/white so if more whites came, they would move the section back a row. Parks is in the middle and waits until eventually it gets full and refuses to move back a row and then sets off what we now know.

MLK's "I have a Dream" speech was crafted and outlined by his lawyer Clarence Jones and Stanley Levison (a former member of the Communist Party which JFK allegedly wanred King about). Feds spied on him like crazy as we know which is how we know of the surveillance of his orgies and the letter Hoover sent threatening him to leave public life via suicide.

But the James Earl Ray, lone gunman story-- I never heard this portion

  • Ray's "confession" was coerced: He pled guilty in '69 to dodge the chair, but recanted within days, claiming his lawyer Percy Foreman and the FBI twisted his arm with threats of a rigged trial. No cross-examination, no real defense—boom, case "closed." Ray spent the rest of his life yelling he was framed, and even the HSCA (1979) couldn't ignore the farce. Smells like the same rush job they pulled on Oswald.

  • Ballistics don't match—wrong gun, wrong shooter: The .30-06 Remington "found" next to the boarding house? FBI tests were inconclusive; it didn't definitively match the fatal bullet. Later probes (like Judge Joe Brown's on the appeals) pointed to two rifles involved, and Ray's fingerprints weren't even on the scope or bag properly. If Ray fired from that tiny bathroom window 200+ yards away, why's the physics off? Echoes of the JFK "magic bullet" nonsense—trajectory screams a second shooter from the bushes or a nearby building, covered up by Memphis PD (who had undercover assets on site).

  • The "Raoul" ghost and Ray's impossible timeline: Ray swore a mystery handler "Raoul" (or Raul) recruited him for a smuggling gig that morphed into the hit, then vanished him post-assassination. Raoul's name pops up in FBI agent Donald Wilson's seized papers from Ray's Mustang (hidden for 30 years, then "discovered" in '98), linking to mob and CIA-adjacent figures. Ray's brothers and Jowers backed it. But Raoul? Never found, description morphs every retelling. Ray, a Missouri con with no sharpshooting chops, suddenly globe-trots to Europe on a fake passport? Funded how? Smells like fed-planted misdirection to muddy the waters.

  • Motive? Ray was a racist drifter, not a King-obsessed assassin: Official line: Ray hated civil rights, supported Wallace. But he had zero personal beef with MLK—why Memphis, why that day? HSCA admitted he likely killed for a bounty (maybe $50K from St. Louis racists or mob), but traced no payout. Ray's own cellmate spilled to feds about an "assassination plot" chat, but it got buried. Compare to Oswald: no motive, just a convenient "lone nut" to shut down the real trail.

  • The bundle drop and planted evidence: That rifle-and-stuff bundle "dropped" in the bushes? Eyewitnesses saw multiple men fleeing the scene, not one. Landlady Bessie Brewer ID'd "John Willard" (Ray's alias) as shorter, younger—not matching Ray's mug. FBI "enhanced" photos and fingerprints to fit, but independents called fraud. And the Mustang? Abandoned with Ray's prints nowhere key—except where it suited the script.

Um you read this and you can't help but notice a few things regarding a recent assassination.
Speaking of a recent assassination, if Republicans lose the midterms give a ton of thanks to lunatic grifter candace owens, who is claiming the entity that most single handedly elected Trump, TPUSA, is who also killed him.

Weird how every single week she goes on about all this new evidence she has...if she has it why doesn't she just release it all at once?

When is israel going to kill fuentes? Seems like a much bigger threat to them. Anywho hes even said he thinks owens is a disgusting money leech off the assassination.

Like, you guys get the feds, etc have tons more evidence on the leftist tranny? Right? They arent letting any of it out bc they cant run the risk of mistrial bc of a partial jury.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: vhcat1970

TheFrontRunner

Hall of Famer
Jun 4, 2019
30,762
215,633
113
Patel and Bongino said they didn't gather any new info, they used the evidence the FBI already had but hadn't acted upon to catch the J6 Bomber:




"We did not discover any new information...we reexamined every piece of evidence, sifted through all the data, something that the prior administration refused and failed to do!"

"As a result of that, we generated numerous investigative leads, executed multiple legal process with their U.S. attorney partners and came to this conclusion today."


















"This wasn't a new tip! It wasn't new evidence. It was the hard work of President Trump's administration."
 

Classy_Bowls

All-American
Aug 29, 2024
931
7,353
93
Remember when Tcurtis said that because Tyler Robinson family was conservative then that meant Kirk shooter was MAGA

Jan 6th family are democrat donors