POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!


  • Total voters
    0
  • Poll closed .

notFromhere

Heisman
Sep 7, 2016
21,910
65,459
113
Lol. Wow what an angry and long screed.

Lol. Only the anger you bring to it. I have put nothing into it.


Clearly I questioned your golden calf.

Another nice fallacy. Do you even know what a golden calf is?

You're correct in that they were 767s and 1 hit each tower.

Might have started with this. Thanks. Lol

(It's been 24 years ok). Without sitting here and calculating the impact force of a 400,000 lbs 767 flying at I'm guessing is around 540 mph

What is the structural integrity of a 767 flying at 540mph under 2000 ft? Just curious

into a stationary object. I believe it's fair to assume it could compromise the structural integrity of 18- 24" structural I beams with the force of impact alone.

So you admit it's merely your belief. Also a good start. I'm not talking about "beliefs" in my post. I'm talking about physics.

What happens when a plane wrapped in thin metal hits layers of 1) steel 2) concrete and steel, and 3) columns of steel that are holding up a 110 story building designed to withstand such an impact? It's a simple question. Relatively speaking it's roughly like a tin foil airplane hitting a wrought iron fence.

Secondly, you seem fixated on the ignition of jet fuel not being able to melt the structural beams.

Nope. You didnt actually read my initial post. It addressed that interior support beams seen in the rubble were neither deformed nor melted, but cut. You seem obsessed with questions I asked for some reason.

But you are failing to consider the resulting thermal expansion and then sagging that would occur on an already compromised structure.

Am I? How much thermal expansion occurred during the impact and explosion? Please tell us so we can consider it. How much sagging was there? I'm sure engineers never consider such things.

It only takes one floor floor collapsing for the momentum to pancake the whole structure,

Lmao. Where did you read that? Marvel or DC? Edgar Rice Burroughs?


which appears to be what happened.

Of course. Controlled demolitions only take out one floor and then gravity does the rest. Everything just pancakes after that. Tell us more.

No, conspiratorial controlled demolition needed.

Yeah, buildings pancake and go straight down against their entire physics. They're designed to fall like that. Every floor isn't designed to hold all the weight above it.

Steel girders stacked and welded one on top of the other don't resist the stress and bend. They compress like pancakes. Concrete pulverizes in mid air rather than breaking into chunks. That's why controlled demolition of 110 story buildings is unnecessary.

(See, I can be facetious, too.)

But yeah, let's pretend I'm the one making the ridiculous assumption(s).

I asked questions. You made the ridiculous assumptions. No one was talking to you even. Yet here you are addressing questions that clearly should never be allowed to be asked and are in your belief- ludicrous.

So why does it trigger you? What do you worship that these questions are so dangerous to your beliefs, and need to be shouted down? Was your golden calf comment projection?

I have no need for it be nor care if it wasn't as the official story indicates. In any of the situations I mentioned. I mourn only the loss of life and decry the lack of transparency, the destruction of evidence, and the denial of care in investigating the incidents. If the investigations were on the up-n-up, there would be NOTHING hidden from the public or destroyed before it could even be studied.

I wish more people cared about that.
 
Last edited:

Blu-ish

All-Conference
Nov 10, 2019
968
2,026
93
I watched a documentary about Yakutsk in Siberia. The coldest city in the world. It was amazing how people survived the winters which lasts for 9 months. Cars have to be left running 24/7 which creates a bad smog. Kids go to school as long as the temperature is above -55. They have to get water by cutting ice from river flows. People usually take only 1 shower a week in an outside shower hut. Frozen fish is a staple. It went on and on. No thanks.
Why would anyone choose to live that life?
 

notFromhere

Heisman
Sep 7, 2016
21,910
65,459
113
I don’t get it. Why are people going after Erika Kirk.

I mean, I get that they’re hateful ******** who want to demean her husband by dragging a widow through the mud…but how does that help their cause?

There ARE hateful doing what you say.

There are also people who are asking legitimate questions about wth happened and why. I don't follow it all because of the nastiness and because I understand it won't matter what anyone finds out. Seriously shady sht though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joe-King

FireWentOut

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2025
449
1,773
93
I doubt anyone here needs to be reminded, but nevertheless…



👏🏻 That’s what i’ve been saying for years—no such thing as a “radicallized“ muslim—they are born into evil from evil—it’s in their dna. The quran is just an instructions manual.
True and true. The Quran is clear on the worth of a nonbeliever.

The difference between a moderate Muslim and a hardcore Muslim is that the hardcore Muslim wants to behead you while the moderate Muslim wants the hardcore Muslim to behead you so they don't have to.
 

FireWentOut

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2025
449
1,773
93

notFromhere

Heisman
Sep 7, 2016
21,910
65,459
113
I doubt anyone here needs to be reminded, but nevertheless…



"Radicalized" works both ways for those who want globalized control. It can deny the uselessness and usefulness of religions in eliminating both rights and opposition when it suits them. It's nazi type fascist propaganda and the germans/nazis were allied with the Ottomans and the Arabs successively. It can be used to both excuse and condemn who it wants when it wants.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joe-King

notFromhere

Heisman
Sep 7, 2016
21,910
65,459
113

notFromhere

Heisman
Sep 7, 2016
21,910
65,459
113
True and true. The Quran is clear on the worth of a nonbeliever.

The Koran and Talmud mirror each other in that way. Didnt the medieval Church have a similar perspective in some of their writings or decrees? Communists too for that matter.

The difference between a moderate Muslim and a hardcore Muslim is that the hardcore Muslim wants to behead you while the moderate Muslim wants the hardcore Muslim to behead you so they don't have to.

I think the difference is in numbers. The more of them, the fewer the moderates.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joe-King

berniecarbo

Heisman
Apr 29, 2020
5,001
28,470
113
True and true. The Quran is clear on the worth of a nonbeliever.

The difference between a moderate Muslim and a hardcore Muslim is that the hardcore Muslim wants to behead you while the moderate Muslim wants the hardcore Muslim to behead you so they don't have to.
I spent significant time in Turkey many years ago. I was waiting on a bus in downtown Izmir. I was wearing suede shoes. A street corner beggar came up and before I even knew what he was doing, he started shining my shoes. Another Turk ( who worked on the base) chased him away. Haven't thought about that in a while. Your post reminded me of it.
 

Joe-King

All-Conference
Sep 18, 2025
723
4,098
93
 

notFromhere

Heisman
Sep 7, 2016
21,910
65,459
113

Attachments

  • img_4_1765765074990.jpg
    img_4_1765765074990.jpg
    94.2 KB · Views: 4