POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!


  • Total voters
    0
  • Poll closed .

Joe-King

All-Conference
Sep 18, 2025
723
4,098
93
 

notFromhere

Heisman
Sep 7, 2016
21,910
65,459
113


The Maronites are the Lebanese, Christian sect that once controlled that country, but had to flee once the Muslims gained control of it. If there isn't another Maronite sect. Wild how things come full circle or history repeats itself. There he is in Australia and has to confront what his people left behind in Lebanon.

We should learn the lesson before we are in his shoes.

We cannot ignore it because we haven't the time, or it's inconvenient, or because it's too hard to look at things that don't agree with what we've been told for decades. The political parties have sold us out as they have people across the world. We have been sent scurrying this way and that to approve of whatever actions they desire to take, while the truth has been hidden.

We do have enemies. Both without and within. Soon enough they will have us fighting each other.
 

UKbrassowTipIn93

All-Conference
Jul 3, 2025
883
4,755
93
Heard Erika was married before. Can't find that being true- just photoshoots with ex boyfriends.

Didn't know she was on Bravo's Summer House dating show which filmed in 2018 and aired early 2019.

Yeah the Bravo show was no secret, it was pretty out in the open and she spoke about it in a doc when kirk was still alive. Im not sure the point here
 

Anon1751658263

All-Conference
Jul 4, 2025
929
4,194
93
Lol. Only the anger you bring to it. I have put nothing into it.




Another nice fallacy. Do you even know what a golden calf is?



Might have started with this. Thanks. Lol



What is the structural integrity of a 767 flying at 540mph under 2000 ft? Just curious



So you admit it's merely your belief. Also a good start. I'm not talking about "beliefs" in my post. I'm talking about physics.

What happens when a plane wrapped in thin metal hits layers of 1) steel 2) concrete and steel, and 3) columns of steel that are holding up a 110 story building designed to withstand such an impact? It's a simple question. Relatively speaking it's roughly like a tin foil airplane hitting a wrought iron fence.



Nope. You didnt actually read my initial post. It addressed that interior support beams seen in the rubble were neither deformed nor melted, but cut. You seem obsessed with questions I asked for some reason.



Am I? How much thermal expansion occurred during the impact and explosion? Please tell us so we can consider it. How much sagging was there? I'm sure engineers never consider such things.



Lmao. Where did you read that? Marvel or DC? Edgar Rice Burroughs?




Of course. Controlled demolitions only take out one floor and then gravity does the rest. Everything just pancakes after that. Tell us more.



Yeah, buildings pancake and go straight down against their entire physics. They're designed to fall like that. Every floor isn't designed to hold all the weight above it.

Steel girders stacked and welded one on top of the other don't resist the stress and bend. They compress like pancakes. Concrete pulverizes in mid air rather than breaking into chunks. That's why controlled demolition of 110 story buildings is unnecessary.

(See, I can be facetious, too.)



I asked questions. You made the ridiculous assumptions. No one was talking to you even. Yet here you are addressing questions that clearly should never be allowed to be asked and are in your belief- ludicrous.

So why does it trigger you? What do you worship that these questions are so dangerous to your beliefs, and need to be shouted down? Was your golden calf comment projection?

I have no need for it be nor care if it wasn't as the official story indicates. In any of the situations I mentioned. I mourn only the loss of life and decry the lack of transparency, the destruction of evidence, and the denial of care in investigating the incidents. If the investigations were on the up-n-up, there would be NOTHING hidden from the public or destroyed before it could even be studied.

I wish more people cared about that.
I'm the one triggered? Wow. And yes, I know precisely what the words I used ( golden calf) mean. I'm beginning to think you dont. Let me help: It means in this context that I offended something (an idea) you revere. I'm sitting here trying to figure out why you are asking about the structural integrity of the non-stationary object instead of the structural integrity of the main subject here. (The building) It's almost like you are attempting to use my words in a totally wrong context in order to give the optics of sounding intelligence. It wouldn't matter if the moving object was made of balsa wood and huge. 400,000 lbs at a high rate of velocity into an immovable object causes bad things to happen whether or not you want to accept it or not. P =m*v
 
Last edited: