Toggle sidebar

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • Total voters
    0
  • Poll closed .
L

Lost In FL

Heisman
Oct 5, 2001
20,854
72,082
113
Fanon said:
? Throw him in jail. Lefties would love to see Clinton prosecuted. What're you on about?
Click to expand...
we know you're a liar and don't believe a word of what you typed. Where is all the "outrage"? No one is above the law, right?!?! where are all the lefties calling for justice? putting willie in jail?

lefties certainly do not want clinton prosecuted. what rubbish.

finally, why do losers get kicked off here and come back multiple times under socks? you should actually be able to answer that question LMAO. your "life" must suck so bad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BBlueD, Beatle Bum, warrior-cat and 8 others
L

Lost In FL

Heisman
Oct 5, 2001
20,854
72,082
113
Fanon said:
I’ve never said a single thing actually worthy of a ban. Half the posters here say worse than I do on the regular. I just get mass reported constantly because I’m the resident leftist. For example this last time I didn’t say a thing against the rules.
Click to expand...
LMAO you are the ...
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Kattonik, FireWentOut, Beatle Bum and 10 others
L

Lost In FL

Heisman
Oct 5, 2001
20,854
72,082
113


The accidental data that’s hard to ignore. Bret Weinstein’s analysis of the 80 Ivermectin Court cases reveals a mind blowing statistic.

In the 40 cases where Ivermectin was permitted 38 survived.
In the 40 cases where it was not 38 died.

Using a standard statistical formula the chances that Ivermectin had no impact are roughly 1 in 20 quadrillion.
As Weinstein put it - ‘like guessing a random 15 digit number on your first try’ Yet we were denied this treatment.
This is one of the biggest medical tragedies in modern history!!
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: Kattonik, exemjr_uk, FireWentOut and 10 others
B

bigblueinsanity (the real)

All-American
Jul 6, 2025
1,786
5,818
113
Lost In FL said:


The accidental data that’s hard to ignore. Bret Weinstein’s analysis of the 80 Ivermectin Court cases reveals a mind blowing statistic.

In the 40 cases where Ivermectin was permitted 38 survived.
In the 40 cases where it was not 38 died.

Using a standard statistical formula the chances that Ivermectin had no impact are roughly 1 in 20 quadrillion.
As Weinstein put it - ‘like guessing a random 15 digit number on your first try’ Yet we were denied this treatment.
This is one of the biggest medical tragedies in modern history!!
Click to expand...


Regardless of patient case outcome, there was literally zero logical argument against giving a covid patient ivermectin. None.

I actually dont buy the argument that it worked vs covid. I think at best it was a placebo effect. However even if If it didn't work, there was zero downside to trying it. It isnt like it would make covid worse.

Literally the only reason it, and other similar treatments, got so much heat was because they had to make sure nothing could threaten that eua.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tls, Beatle Bum, warrior-cat and 5 others
L

Lost In FL

Heisman
Oct 5, 2001
20,854
72,082
113
bigblueinsanity (the real) said:
Regardless of patient case outcome, there was literally zero logical argument against giving a covid patient ivermectin. None.

I actually dont buy the argument that it worked vs covid. I think at best it was a placebo effect. However even if If it didn't work, there was zero downside to trying it. It isnt like it would make covid worse.

Literally the only reason it, and other similar treatments, got so much heat was because they had to make sure nothing could threaten that eua.
Click to expand...
you're wrong brother. I am literally here to tell you it works. Had covid twice, didn't have ivermectin with one and did with the other. one week and felt miserable for a couple weeks vs one day and i felt incredible the next day. I know it is only one case, but i have several friends that used iv and they were 100% a day later.

There was NO COVID CRISIS. It was manufactured fear porn.

and there was a HUGE reason not to allow use of iv ... patents. pfizer and others had these products they wanted to push and experiment with and couldnt force without the EUA/EAU. If iv was allowed, then there was, again, NO COVID CRISIS, no emergency.

and weak-willed people/lemmings played along and wanted to remove many of us from society. I will never forget what "democracy" looks like ... mob rule.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BBlueD, Kattonik, tls and 7 others
notFromhere

notFromhere

Heisman
Sep 7, 2016
22,007
65,898
113
  • Like
  • Angry
Reactions: exemjr_uk, paulcalhoun_rivals397471, warrior-cat and 1 other person
notFromhere

notFromhere

Heisman
Sep 7, 2016
22,007
65,898
113
Bear down, Chicago Bears!
Make every play clear the way to victory.
Bear down, Chicago Bears! Put up a fight with a might so fearlessly....
You're the pride and joy of Illinois (Indiana)!? Chicago Bears, bear down!
 
  • Like
Reactions: ScrewDuke1 and Simple Man
SDC337

SDC337

All-American
Feb 14, 2021
918
5,691
93
TheFrontRunner said:
On the Somalis...










On the Dems love of mutilating kids:

Click to expand...


THis is essentially what I was going to post after reading that.

THen the have the audacity to call you "racist" for noticing. The betrayal of the Left to this country is really unfathomable, incalculable. There's no going forward until these people fix themselves. Get over yourselves, you know nothing ingrates. Your maliciously inculcated white guilt is a con; you are exploited, racist and self-loathing, useful idiots.

This works out to be a theft of about $6000 per tax-paying household in Minnesota A large part of the reason life has gotten so hard for productive people is that the government has facilitated the active theft of their money in exchange for votes, even going so far as to import people from incompatible cultures so as to harvest their votes It is a complete betrayal, bordering on treason

 
  • Angry
  • Like
Reactions: sefus12, Kattonik, exemjr_uk and 10 others
warrior-cat

warrior-cat

Hall of Famer
Oct 22, 2004
191,256
154,150
113
notFromhere said:
How do people say with a straight face that "ACA subsidies" don't increase health insurance rates" but then somehow think that "tariffs flow through and are paid by the consumer on the back end"? As if somehow the govt paying part of something doesn't increase the retail value of what the people are selling that is subsidized? It takes a special kind of stupid to think that a corporate business or govt that knows how much it's customers can afford would just not charge more when they are getting help paying their bills.

Higher education skyrocketing in costs, while standards of admission were lowered, and state schools began buying up land, swelling with unnecessary and bureaucratic jobs, and delivering degrees for which there are no jobs was ALL done on the backs of the Stafford loan program.

They knew what families were willing and able to pay. So they began to increase costs as soon as the loan programs were helping school to be more affordable. Aks a liberal if govt subsidies actually helped decrease costs of a college degree... or health care costs... or health insurance costs... or lowered taxes... increased wages... or ....
Click to expand...
Plus, the degrees they are delivering are worthless and graded on a money curve. If they want more people, they will make it easier to pass basket weaving 101.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: exemjr_uk, paulcalhoun_rivals397471, ScrewDuke1 and 3 others
warrior-cat

warrior-cat

Hall of Famer
Oct 22, 2004
191,256
154,150
113
notFromhere said:
So you won't be taking accountability serious anytime soon then... ok.

What did you say that got you banned? Give us a quote so we can all decide for ourselves. I'm actually pretty impartial when it comes to judging things.
Click to expand...
Yeah, generally I don't care what people post. If you are too thinned skinned, don't come here and read.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vhcat1970, Kattonik, ScrewDuke1 and 3 others
warrior-cat

warrior-cat

Hall of Famer
Oct 22, 2004
191,256
154,150
113
notFromhere said:
The ONLY reason the USA exists is because a once unified group of slightly differing biblical beliefs ALL wanted the religious freedom to worship the God of the Bible as they saw fit. That's why they settled and survived here. That's why they were able to defeat a world power to become and stay a nation (2x) and why they have continued to exist as a unification of states until now.

It wasnt the Boston Tea party. It wasn't crossing the Delaware. It wasn't George Washington or Thomas Jefferson. It was a convention of states with a biblical understanding of creation and God-given rights, with only limited govt as a necessity rather than the ideal (which would be God as King) --- everyone respecting each other's rights. They knew then that once enough greedy people came into positions of authority this country would fall, and did their best to prevent it for as long as possible.

Vivek is a product of relative morality and modern platitudes without any substance. I don't think I'd trust him to be able to work a shift at McDs. I don't dislike him, but have no idea why he thinks people should trust him to run anything governmental. Totally see how he could be a software or social media developer though. He seems like a sailboat with a fancy sail and no captain/rudder
Click to expand...
While agree with your biblical references above concerning the country I also agree with the assertion that we are a nation of ideals and if you want to be an American you must come here legally (obey the law) and declare your loyalty to this country, flag, and the ideals that make us who we are. You don't have to denounce your old country, but you must make this one your top choice when it comes to loyalties. I have had soldiers who came from Cuba and eastern bloc countries who loved this country and served in our military and would give their lives for this country (Ideal).
 
  • Like
Reactions: vhcat1970, Kattonik, paulcalhoun_rivals397471 and 1 other person
warrior-cat

warrior-cat

Hall of Famer
Oct 22, 2004
191,256
154,150
113
Lost In FL said:


The accidental data that’s hard to ignore. Bret Weinstein’s analysis of the 80 Ivermectin Court cases reveals a mind blowing statistic.

In the 40 cases where Ivermectin was permitted 38 survived.
In the 40 cases where it was not 38 died.

Using a standard statistical formula the chances that Ivermectin had no impact are roughly 1 in 20 quadrillion.
As Weinstein put it - ‘like guessing a random 15 digit number on your first try’ Yet we were denied this treatment.
This is one of the biggest medical tragedies in modern history!!
Click to expand...

Like I said the other day, they (the left) want us to die. Who were the ones most affected? 60's and older who are our SS recipients (largest portion) which means, they kill 2 birds with one stone. Lower the number of people in the world and keep more taxpayer dollars for themselves.

Conspiratorial? Yeah maybe. OTOH...
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: Kattonik, ScrewDuke1, Beatle Bum and 3 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom