POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!


  • Total voters
    0
  • Poll closed .

Ash Williams

Heisman
Aug 3, 2022
7,732
25,456
113
DON'T COME TO FLORIDA YOU LEFTIST *****!
 
Last edited:

BigBluefoot

All-American
Jul 4, 2025
1,159
5,572
113
??? "I oppose aggression." But you support us blowing up a country's air defenses, flying into it, dropping special forces, kidnapping their head of state, and killing everyone who gets in our way. Oh, and blowing up a TOMB just for fun while we're at it.

Explain.
"Head of state."
He lost the election in a landslide and then used his thugs to seize power. So, no....he's an illegitimate commie thug.
But "no kangz," amirite?
And yeah, blowing up one of your idols was pretty damn funny touch.
 
Last edited:

Marley2

All-Conference
Dec 30, 2024
680
3,578
93
I do get banned for mine. And as for the rest of it:

"I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational." - Charlie Kirk

Good Lord, he is making the most logical case possible here. Yes, freedom is going to carry some risk of murders and other crime.

So does communism and socialism and tyranny, albeit most deaths are then caused by the government.
 

BigBluefoot

All-American
Jul 4, 2025
1,159
5,572
113
Do you actually think our Founders would have supported a president being able to unilaterally just order an invasion of another country to kidnap and depose their head of state? NO ONE DOES. This isn't what America was supposed to be. That's inarguable.
Actually it's very arguable, and perfectly legal.
Lemme guess, we were supposed to endanger special operators lives by notifying people in the very same legislature whom literally called for sedition against the CIC amongst our troops a few weeks ago?
 

Fanon

Sophomore
Dec 16, 2025
564
197
43
Now show us in the quote where Kirk mentioned shootings and murders based on left wing political speech, the point you're flailing about trying to make.
Gun death are gun deaths. He's referring to his own shooting. Worth the price of the Second Amendment to him.
 

Fanon

Sophomore
Dec 16, 2025
564
197
43
Actually it's very arguable, and perfectly legal.
Lemme guess, we were supposed to endanger special operators lives by notifying people in the very same legislature whom literally called for sedition against the CIC amongst our troops a few weeks ago?
The president shouldn't be notifying or even asking for permission. They shouldn't be doing it at all. If Congress wants to declare war and invade someone they can get the votes to do so. Then the executive can execute that. Nothing else. For too long has the legislative branch abdicated its power. We are not a monarchy. Or as you so succinctly just posted, "no kangz."
 

TheFrontRunner

Hall of Famer
Jun 4, 2019
31,059
218,674
113
Edited this post to something different cause it had already been posted, shut up @ScrewDuke1 and don't say anything about a silver medal haha:

It's past midnight...it is Jan. 6th, the darkest day in our history. I pray for all of you as you try to deal with the memories and the fear you felt that day. Don't worry, Eric Swalwell is on it.










And don't forget, that AOC thinks some MFer has a dick so big he can rape her from another building haha

 
Last edited:

Ash Williams

Heisman
Aug 3, 2022
7,732
25,456
113
Good Lord, he is making the most logical case possible here. Yes, freedom is going to carry some risk of murders and other crime.

So does communism and socialism and tyranny, albeit most deaths are then caused by the government.
His argument is contrived (fake), emotional, and childish. It shows a stunted intellect and a desire to manipulate. You'd be best to ignore this fool.
 

sefus12

Heisman
Dec 22, 2007
6,907
18,506
103
Looks like Massachushits has finally just said screw it and decided to limit how much a person can drive.

The leftist politicians want to try and force commuters to use the public transit system (both buses and trains). The problem is that it’s even less efficient to use public transit for most cities/towns outside of the immediate downtown area than the horrible traffic is. So essentially this would try and get people who are already mad about sitting in traffic for an hour to go 8 miles each way from work to extend that commute to 1.5 hours while taking three buses and a train, and that’s not even taking into account the fact that the Boston train systems are insanely unreliable at best.

It’s hard to understand how stupid politicians can be until you live in a place like MA. I can promise you it’s THAT bad.
 

Marley2

All-Conference
Dec 30, 2024
680
3,578
93
O
His argument is contrived (fake), emotional, and childish. It shows a stunted intellect and a desire to manipulate. You'd be best to ignore this fool.
Oh, he's on ignore. Occasionally I hit show ignored content to mock them for a page worth of idiocy.

Other than that, I'm not reading all of the preposterous words those fools type.
 

TheFrontRunner

Hall of Famer
Jun 4, 2019
31,059
218,674
113
Miller vs Tapper haha.

I just love the response. Miller: "Damn straight we did!! We're not going to let tin-pot communist dictators send rap*sts into our country, send drugs into our country, send weapons into our country, and we're not going to let a country fall into the hands of our adversaries. "









"We will conduct ourselves as a super power"









On Greenland:




"Greenland should be part of the US. That is the formal position of the US government!"

"Greenland has a population of 30,000 people. By what right does DENMARK assert control over Greenland? What is their basis of having Greenland as a colony?"

"NOBODY will fight the US militarily over Greenland."






 

BigBluefoot

All-American
Jul 4, 2025
1,159
5,572
113
The president shouldn't be notifying or even asking for permission. They shouldn't be doing it at all. If Congress wants to declare war and invade someone they can get the votes to do so. Then the executive can execute that. Nothing else. For too long has the legislative branch abdicated its power. We are not a monarchy. Or as you so succinctly just posted, "no kangz."
The problem here at its core is, you can't discern a military action from a state of war
, because it's not convenient for an argument that originates from dishonesty. Don't lecture us on separation of powers when you have legislatures openly calling for sedition, and UNELECTED robed judicial tyrants continually undermining things like immigration which are clearly the domain of the executive branch.
 

Fanon

Sophomore
Dec 16, 2025
564
197
43
The problem here at its core is, you can't discern a military action from a state of war
, because it's not convenient for an argument that originates from dishonesty. Don't lecture us on separation of powers when you have legislatures openly calling for sedition, and UNELECTED robed judicial tyrants continually undermining things like immigration which are clearly the domain of the executive branch.
A 'special' military action. Or as Fox News said, an "extraordinary military action." :ROFLMAO:

You and I both know the Founders wouldn't abide that chicanery.
 
Last edited: