What's really cool about the Creator is that lack of need for belief in Him. He'd love it if you did believe and taught others through moral actions, but neither is necessary for Him to still provide the world what He does. In fact, He leaves just enough room for doubt for those who are looking to do so.
Rarely is anyone convinced logically that there is or isn't a designer and creator. It takes a person who values life and truth over many other things like money, physical pleasure, prestige, and/or power. There really aren't that many people that would set those things aside if it was required for faith. In many cases a person "walks away" from religion or a loosely formed belief in God because of a circumstance or a perceived slight.
I know someone whose uncle went to church, sung in the choir, and spent a lot of time and money there outside of services, but wasn't a believer. He "walked away" when something major happened to or within his family. In spite of all of the blessings he experienced his entire life, one event made him a virtual atheist (yet one who was angry presumably and later admittedly at God). It was only at the end of his life that he looked back and realized all the things that God had done for him and that these things in total were not all just coincidences. He was a different man by all accounts, even though it was for a very short time.
The fact is that he could see all along that God existed, but like many didn't want to, and took the first opportunity to turn aside from it publicly. It didn't hurt him that it was also a popular thing to do at the time. Yet he realized more and more as he saw the way the world was changing for the worse without God that he was wrong.
It's been very well stated in this thread that there is ZERO PROOF of abiogenesis. There is likewise ZERO PROOF of natural evolution of species one from another, as it has not been directly observed by anyone. There are theories and premises. There are observations. Some are objective but some are not. Objectivity requires more than one observer to verify both our observations and our conclusions, but mere number of observers doesn't guarantee objectivity.
Creation is no less scientific as a theory than abiogenesis. No less a theory in merit than evolution. Likewise the reverse is true. No one has witnessed something created from nothing, just as no one has witnessed life appearing from nothing. No one has witnessed a species evolving from another species, as well. Thousands of years of recorded history and no record of any of these things being directly observed by humans.
The scientific mind understands both theory and probability, chance and data. It doesn't exclude data, probability, nor observations, but considers all.
This is why there is a growing understanding of the infinitesimal times the infinitesimal times the infinitesmal (approaching infinity) likelihood of all that we see existing having come into original existence at the same time.
All of the many systems in the human body alone are so interdependent and accountable to each other that the likelihood of them having evolved and survived is infinitesimally small. The same can be said for any other animal, plant, or system of such. This entire planet is dependent on the rest of the planet and the solar system. Remove the water. Remove the sky. Remove the wind or tides. The trees. The animals. Slightly change the orbit relative to where it is now. Change the orbit of the moon. Place the solar system closer to another. Change the orbits and periods of the other planets. Darken the sun just a bit. Make the planet spin faster or slower. Remove an element or two. Vastly different outcomes and the very likely the collapse of the entire system.
The only other somewhat rational theory besides design/creation is that of evolution (which is also dependent on abiogenesis). Yet neither has been directly observed and recorded. There are only perceived, superficial similarities and stations between species.
