I just don't understand it. We beat UF by a ton, then lost by a ton, and lost a closely contested game on Sunday. UF is the #3 RPI team, they were playing at home. If UK was a national seed last week, then they should be a national seed this week barring a bad performance in Hoover.
I wonder if the fact that LSU swept MSU had anything to do with us dropping. It may be that they really feel that only two SEC teams will be national seeds.
Here is the thing with Stanford... they will be playing 3 more games guaranteed. All of those games are against Washington State (103rd in RPI). They are projected to win all of those games on the road. IMO, this shouldn't move the needle a whole lot for them.
On the other hand, UK will first face a team ranked 34th in RPI. If they win that they are likely to face the 8th best RPI team. They win again and they are likely facing another top 25 RPI team (possibly LSU again). So, IMO, UK has a lot more of a chance to move the needle and improve their resume compared to Stanford.
However, this all comes down to whether or not the committee wants to put in 3 SEC teams or 2, and whether they want another western team to be a national seed. The problem for UK is that right now that is the most fair top 8 possible. 2 Pac 12, 2 Big 12, 2 SEC, and 2 ACC. I think the committee would have a hard time changing that up. As for UK, if we beat LSU one or two more times I don't know how in the hell they get the nod over us when we beat them heads up the majority of the time.