wrestlers prefer the smaller place they don't pay the rent!When is Pat Kraft going to wise up and hold all the wrestling matches at BJC. Obviously the matches always sellout.
wrestlers prefer the smaller place they don't pay the rent!When is Pat Kraft going to wise up and hold all the wrestling matches at BJC. Obviously the matches always sellout.
well the bucks did make one point,they only have one guy on there team that would start for PSU!
B1* title just another career achievement for the hawks to not be at the top of. Might be Zain or Mitch that breaks it ultimately but the lions at the top I can forseeTo the extent people care about the Big Ten Tournament team standings.
I'd be OK if no team score were kept. Its only purpose is qualification for nationals.
no he went on vaca!Did the "Tan one" have a post match press conference?
...and we all know that anything that is definitely, probably the reason something happens then it most likely, absolutely was the cause.Yes but it seldom makes a difference. On the other board I did a pretty in depth analysis of the big tens since 2015 and only in 2022 when Michigan won by 1.5 points could you say definitively the byes probably made a difference.
82% of the time......and we all know that anything that is definitely, probably the reason something happens then it most likely, absolutely was the cause.
FIFYIn other words how do you win 5 natty's (One of them being on one leg) and zero hodges.
Cael= ConanYou would think Cael would want to take everything from Iowa.
Regarding tOSU having 3 starters out for the dual, a little bit of simple math is in order. If those 3 missing starters had wrestled, they would have had to score three tech falls to win the dual. The score would have been 20-20 and I think tOSU would have won by criteria.
What are the odds that would have happened?
My favorite of all the matches I've seen in person . I have seen maybe 8-10 and the 2024 big tens.Yea it was like Rocco didn't want to go neutral in the first period after the take down , he was on his feet most of the ride out.
PSU kicked the snot out of OSU. There may have been a handful of really tight matches, but there is a reason Penn State won all of those matches and it isn't because they were lucky. Moreso because they are better.Just finished up watching neb/indiana. I don’t dislike Nebraska but NOT fond of Manning so I was rooting against Nebraska. First match 5-0 ind than a total butt kicking by Nebraska. A lot of matches that were close almost an upset for Indiana. End of match I’m thinking even no some matches were close that was a butt kickin by Nebraska. I looked at the score and was thinking PSU beat OSU by more than Nebraska over Indiana.
If you look at most likely scenarios say that at 149 Van Ness wins by decision, Duke loses by decision, and Haines wins by decision now tOSU has 9 points instead of 5. Penn State would then in turn have 26. I guess 26-9 seems a lot better but is it really?Regarding tOSU having 3 starters out for the dual, a little bit of simple math is in order. If those 3 missing starters had wrestled, they would have had to score three tech falls to win the dual. The score would have been 20-20 and I think tOSU would have won by criteria.
What are the odds that would have happened?
OSU would have 8. However I hardly think it can be assumed OSU likely wins 157. Maybe a 50-50 toss-up, but OSU wasn't winning 157.If you look at most likely scenarios say that at 149 Van Ness wins by decision, Duke loses by decision, and Haines wins by decision now tOSU has 9 points instead of 5. Penn State would then in turn have 26. I guess 26-9 seems a lot better but is it really?
You're right for some reason I counted Mendez as 6. Maybe it just felt like a 6OSU would have 8. However I hardly think it can be assumed OSU likely wins 157. Maybe a 50-50 toss-up, but OSU wasn't winning 157.
OSU would have 8. However I hardly think it can be assumed OSU likely wins 157. Maybe a 50-50 toss-up, but OSU wasn't winning 157.
Unless you’re giving Cannon a major over Duke, it’s 8 points for tOSU. 26-8If you look at most likely scenarios say that at 149 Van Ness wins by decision, Duke loses by decision, and Haines wins by decision now tOSU has 9 points instead of 5. Penn State would then in turn have 26. I guess 26-9 seems a lot better but is it really?
Most likely Duke loses to Cannon?If you look at most likely scenarios say that at 149 Van Ness wins by decision, Duke loses by decision, and Haines wins by decision now tOSU has 9 points instead of 5. Penn State would then in turn have 26. I guess 26-9 seems a lot better but is it really?
in the best case for tOSU is what I should have said. They weren't winning at 149 or 174. Cannon and Duke would be pretty even and you can argue one way or the other but there would be no bonus.Most likely Duke loses to Cannon?
Everybody complains when Rocco wins a low scoring match against other top level guys. Since his win over Ferrari he has wrestled different, looser, not as defensive guys getting to his legs and causing a scramble losing some and wrestling back and wining. What is odd about trying to become a better all around wrestler in every position.Rocco's match was the definition of odd. However, the amount of times Dylan Fishback has been taken down 2 times or more in a match can probably be counted on one hand (maybe slight over exaggeration but McEnelly went to SV against him twice this year after a 1-1 match) That's the main reason I was worried, Fishback isn't super offensive but his bread and butter is usually when he can do it, he wins the match because his defense is elite.
For Rocco to need 2 and to get it in basically 90 seconds is something else and in my opinion bodes well for March. His first period strategy on bottom ... let's just say I think the coaches will get that revised
OSU would have 8. However I hardly think it can be assumed OSU likely wins 157. Maybe a 50-50 toss-up, but OSU wasn't winning 157.
Given how Rocco has adjusted his offensive strategy his first season with the Penn State coaches, it shows he is coachable. The fact he transferred here without any apparent promises from Cael regarding being a starter shows his willingness to make the adjustments the coaches suggest. Given his athleticism and strength, I think he is going to be an absolute terror his last two seasons. Remember the Ryder leaving pearl clutching? Me neither, as Rocco's performance this season has left those pearls lying quietly in the dust : )Everybody complains when Rocco wins a low scoring match against other top level guys. Since his win over Ferrari he has wrestled different, looser, not as defensive guys getting to his legs and causing a scramble losing some and wrestling back and wining. What is odd about trying to become a better all around wrestler in every position.
Again I truly believe he is listening to the coaches and trying to change his strategy from pure defensive to a more offensive style.
We may see the same Rocco from two years ago in March but atleast we will know he has a good possibility of a come from behind win if need be.
Regarding Cannon, given how long he will have been out after his surgery doesn't bode well for him in the post season. Unlike someone like Carter, his strength is his offensive attack rate and not his defense and positioning. I very much doubt the version of Cannon we see at the NCAA tournament will be like the one prior to his injury. There is also no guarantee he will be healed up enough to wrestle, although I haven't heard any specifics on how his recovery is going. I do feel bad for him, though. He was having a phenomenal season, and injuries always suck.Agreed, VanNess and Haines were virtual locks (the chances that one or both scored bonus is pretty high) - to put those in the same category as 157 and say PSU likely loses 157 is somewhat absurd. There is zero evidence that Cannon likely beats Duke.
It was 6. Mendez forgot to belly tap at the end.You're right for some reason I counted Mendez as 6. Maybe it just felt like a 6
No, they lose on criteria. I think the criteria are:Regarding tOSU having 3 starters out for the dual, a little bit of simple math is in order. If those 3 missing starters had wrestled, they would have had to score three tech falls to win the dual. The score would have been 20-20 and I think tOSU would have won by criteria.
What are the odds that would have happened?
It starts with total number of bout victories. If that is tied, it goes next to (in order):No, they lose on criteria. I think the criteria are:
1. Match wins (still PSU 6-4)
2. Most pins (PSU 1-0)
3. Match points (probably tOSU if you’re giving them 3 TFs, but who knows).
I couldn't agree more. Rocco said in an interview he came to PSU to learn how to scramble and become more offensive. So far, so great! He doesn't have the scrambling part down but his offensive firepower has grown by leaps and bounds. He's just not confident enough in his scrambling to take more shots against top top competitors yet, but if he keeps working it hard, it will come. Very high on what he can accomplish.Given how Rocco has adjusted his offensive strategy his first season with the Penn State coaches, it shows he is coachable. The fact he transferred here without any apparent promises from Cael regarding being a starter shows his willingness to make the adjustments the coaches suggest. Given his athleticism and strength, I think he is going to be an absolute terror his last two seasons.
I remember telling my buddy before the match that pretty much everyone had this going to overtime lol. Boy was that the wrong call. Loved the crowd after that matchRocco's match was the definition of odd. However, the amount of times Dylan Fishback has been taken down 2 times or more in a match can probably be counted on one hand (maybe slight over exaggeration but McEnelly went to SV against him twice this year after a 1-1 match) That's the main reason I was worried, Fishback isn't super offensive but his bread and butter is usually when he can do it, he wins the match because his defense is elite.
For Rocco to need 2 and to get it in basically 90 seconds is something else and in my opinion bodes well for March. His first period strategy on bottom ... let's just say I think the coaches will get that revised
I will admit i was absolutely wrong about losing ryder and gaining roccoGiven how Rocco has adjusted his offensive strategy his first season with the Penn State coaches, it shows he is coachable. The fact he transferred here without any apparent promises from Cael regarding being a starter shows his willingness to make the adjustments the coaches suggest. Given his athleticism and strength, I think he is going to be an absolute terror his last two seasons. Remember the Ryder leaving pearl clutching? Me neither, as Rocco's performance this season has left those pearls lying quietly in the dust : )
Not the only one.I will admit i was absolutely wrong about losing ryder and gaining rocco