PSU - That was ugly

GatoLouco

Sophomore
Nov 13, 2019
5,636
116
63
And it was beautiful.

Because good teams find ways to win.

Even if it’s winning ugly.
 

Hungry Jack

All-Conference
Nov 17, 2008
37,188
2,678
67
I love it. Team showed it has real gumption—not the ersatz kind.

My only regret is that Robbie Hummel was not there to see Martinelli use his right hand.
 

rwhitney014

Sophomore
Dec 5, 2007
5,246
180
27
Wins are always beautiful. Especially road wins and especially at the crypt in State College.
 

GOUNUII

Junior
Jan 4, 2004
6,418
238
63
I love it. Team showed it has real gumption—not the ersatz kind.

My only regret is that Robbie Hummel was not there to see Martinelli use his right hand.
Down 10 at the 15 minute mark of the 2nd half the Cats outscored PSU 31-17 the rest of the way.

That was impressive. A 3-1 start to conference play. Very impressive.

GOUNUII
 

The_Waterboy

Freshman
May 29, 2001
2,490
61
0
With Mickey Gilley's country western classic playing in the background...

"The girls all get prettier at closin' time!"
 

MCC_Cat

Junior
May 29, 2001
1,510
211
63
We had it in the bag when Preston hit both his FT's. Then I relaxed and knew the stars were aligned in our favor.
 

eastbaycat99

Sophomore
Mar 7, 2009
2,519
168
48
That was a critical win. I have been hoping against hope that they could reach the halfway point in conference play 5-5, which would be remarkable considering the first ten games include two with Purdue, two with the Illini, one at Wisconsin, one at Nebraska, and OSU and MSU at home. The second half of the season‘s schedule is a little more forgiving.
 

Secho99

Freshman
Dec 12, 2001
1,843
75
48
Best kind of win.

Make shots! (58% from 3, 63% from 2, 71% from the line)
What a weird box score. 18 turnovers, only 44 FG attempts, but we shoot 61% and score 76 points.

Ty Berry is 18-31 on 3s in his last 5 games, averaging 17 ppg in that span. That after scoring a total of 3 points the 2 games before that. He's up to 46% from 3 on the year. That's probably not sustainable, but him ending up 41-42% this year would be what we've been hoping for out of him.
 

CappyNU

Junior
Mar 2, 2004
5,167
346
83
We had the same offensive efficiency against MSU and PSU when you look at possessions that didn't end in a turnover - 1.46 PPP. The difference between scoring 88 points in a comfortable 65 possession win and scoring 76 points in a 70 possession game - 18 turnovers vs 5.
 

docrugby1

Senior
Jun 16, 2010
6,824
436
58
The game was physical and the refs let them play. Each team may have had some gripes but I enjoyed the contact and the refs approach
 

purplejustice

Redshirt
Jan 2, 2006
1,074
43
48
Team showed great poise to come back after falling behind by 10. They went on a 15-0 run. They are a gritty team that does not give up. My concern is the lack of depth in a long season. Is there anyone who can join the rotation even for 5 minutes a game?
 

Jonny2TheP

Junior
Dec 11, 2007
8,553
301
57
What a weird box score. 18 turnovers, only 44 FG attempts, but we shoot 61% and score 76 points.

Ty Berry is 18-31 on 3s in his last 5 games, averaging 17 ppg in that span. That after scoring a total of 3 points the 2 games before that. He's up to 46% from 3 on the year. That's probably not sustainable, but him ending up 41-42% this year would be what we've been hoping for out of him.
To have three legit scoring options outside of Buie is so big. Berry, Brooks (who has actually struggled the last month before tonight) and Langborg are all guys who can be legit scoring options on a given night. What a weapon to have for a playmaker like Buie.

It’s been awhile since we’ve had four different guys who can go for 20 on a given night. It allows for more margin for error from the others.

It also allows for us to win a road game on a night we had double the turnovers we typically have.
 

AdamOnFirst

All-Conference
Nov 29, 2021
9,719
1,365
113
The turnovers were just ridiculously absurd, but at least the defense improved greatly after a horrible first half there too.

I fundamentally do not understand why Collins stuck with the decision to use a lot of Barnheiser, Berry, and others (even Martinelli) to bring up the ball and initiate the offense against the press and trap. I understand the initial philosophy behind it, but Penn State was eating those guys alive and forcing way way too many turnovers when Boo wasn’t in control of things. I do not understand at all how they didn’t move away from that as the game went on, especially when they were having BB initiate the offense in the closing minutes, which caused even more turnovers.
 

GatoLouco

Sophomore
Nov 13, 2019
5,636
116
63
To have three legit scoring options outside of Buie is so big. Berry, Brooks (who has actually struggled the last month before tonight) and Langborg are all guys who can be legit scoring options on a given night. What a weapon to have for a playmaker like Buie.
That's what makes us a pretty good team. When you are actually playing the game with legit threats around you things are so much easier.

You can't easily see it from the stands but as one of those threats steps up, the other team, not even needing input from the coach, adapts. Think last night with Berry, he hits a few, the guy guarding him stops floating much on defense on the help side. It opens the game more for the other threats. More space to play, lesser defenders on them. Someone else steps us. And so on and so on. The blanket struggles to cover all threats.
 

SmellyCat

Junior
May 29, 2001
7,290
340
83
Exactly. Berry didn't get many open looks in the second half, which is when NU made their run with other threats. Just the threat of Berry hitting a three made NU better, and he didn't even have to hit any from that point!
 

Figrating

Redshirt
Dec 19, 2007
3,568
30
0
NU does drama. Looks like NU has momentum, is even favored and you tune in expecting to see NU set the pace, only to watch the first half of the PSU game, which was just absolutely discouraging in every way. It seemed like the TV was saying, "Turn me off!!! Turn me off!!!" Good thing we've been discouraged by the great NU teams in the past, so we knew to wait for the Cinderella ending. Huge W. Looks like NU has momentum.

SO impressed that NU just turned this game around - mostly the better players finding their games. The curse of PSU is lifted.

Seems like the press loves UW, likely picked by 6 or so, but NU could have one of their really good games and win it. You want some more drama there?
 

PurpleWhiteBoy

Redshirt
Feb 25, 2021
5,303
0
0
NU does drama. Looks like NU has momentum, is even favored and you tune in expecting to see NU set the pace, only to watch the first half of the PSU game, which was just absolutely discouraging in every way. It seemed like the TV was saying, "Turn me off!!! Turn me off!!!" Good thing we've been discouraged by the great NU teams in the past, so we knew to wait for the Cinderella ending. Huge W. Looks like NU has momentum.

SO impressed that NU just turned this game around - mostly the better players finding their games. The curse of PSU is lifted.

Seems like the press loves UW, likely picked by 6 or so, but NU could have one of their really good games and win it. You want some more drama there?
Honestly, I wasn't worried at halftime. Penn State lost their whole team this offseason and changed their playing style completely. All we had to do was re-gain our composure and drop a couple Nicholbombs.