Penn St was considered in after beating Maryland.
Sorry but same record in conference and nearly same record overall. RU had better net and beat them twice. RU over PSU if tourney didn’t happen. Another BS subjective criteria by the selection committee.Penn St was considered in after beating Maryland.
If you don’t care to understand that’s up to you. Enjoy the rest of your thread.Sorry but same record in conference and nearly same record overall. RU had better net and beat them twice. RU over PSU if tourney didn’t happen. Another BS subjective criteria by the selection committee.
Sorry but same record in conference and nearly same record overall. RU had better net and beat them twice. RU over PSU if tourney didn’t happen. Another BS subjective criteria by the selection committee.
And then they disregarded how we played in non-conference without a couple of players who later returned and then cited our non-conference performance as poor. So if we just played like we did in the last month and Mag was still in the lineup, we would've made it? Based on the chairman's explanation it sure sounds like it because our bubble competitors weren't exactly kicking *** against top flight competition the last month.They told you why Rutgers didn't go
They literally took the resume and threw it in the trash and just focused on how we looked without a player
It would be interesting to know when they threw Rutgers resume in the trash. Maybe after Minnesota or northwestern.They told you why Rutgers didn't go
They literally took the resume and threw it in the trash and just focused on how we looked without a player
There's no way we would've been left out if we beat Purdue on Friday.It would be interesting to know when they threw Rutgers resume in the trash. Maybe after Minnesota or northwestern.
I am not sure if we would have gotten in if we beat purdue and then lost to Ohio state in the BIG tournament.
It was crazy that with our metrics, weak bubble and no bid thiefs we were still 2 spots away from Dayton ! In a normal year we would have been way way out with this committee
Next time an injury like this happens , feed the press BS. Dress the injured guy (mag) for the conference tournament and say he is available and will be playing in the NCAA tournament .And then they disregarded how we played in non-conference without a couple of players who later returned and then cited our non-conference performance as poor. So if we just played like we did in the last month and Mag was still in the lineup, we would've made it? Based on the chairman's explanation it sure sounds like it because our bubble competitors weren't exactly kicking *** against top flight competition the last month.
Possibility . I don’t think the committee was watching at that point . Beating purdue would have got them to notice us, yes . But if we laid an egg against Ohio state we still might have been outThere's no way we would've been left out if we beat Purdue on Friday.
There's no way we would've been left out if we beat Purdue on Friday.
I agree . They weren’t watching these games.Im actually not so sure anymore
He stepped on a guy's foot.Don't forget the reason why we lost that player in an NBA arena with a fresh coat of paint or different squares of wood floor for the B1G made playing conditions pretty slick in a "home game" on Feb 4th that should have been played at Jersey Mike's but forced upon us by our own conference? The Knicks played home games on Feb 2nd vs the Heat and Feb 4th, the same day as, vs the Clippers.
Im actually not so sure anymore
Huh. I think I’m raising a legitimate point. You can’t just point to the final game of the regular season as rationale. Please tell me where that’s flawed? It’s been reported that the tourneys weren’t factored in. If they weren’t then what were the resumes at the end of the year?If you don’t care to understand that’s up to you. Enjoy the rest of your thread.
They aren’t factored inHuh. I think I’m raising a legitimate point. You can’t just point to the final game of the regular season as rationale. Please tell me where that’s flawed? It’s been reported that the tourneys weren’t factored in. If they weren’t then what were the resumes at the end of the year?
Huh. I think I’m raising a legitimate point. You can’t just point to the final game of the regular season as rationale. Please tell me where that’s flawed? It’s been reported that the tourneys weren’t factored in. If they weren’t then what were the resumes at the end of the year?
They told you why Rutgers didn't go
They literally took the resume and threw it in the trash and just focused on how we looked without a player
8 days ago, higher net and beat them twice. Same conference record, no?When i have time I’ll dig up the exact resume as of 8 days ago. It was good enough for them to get in at the time
I thought I had heard non contactHe stepped on a guy's foot.