Mine:
Aberdeen
Oweh
Noah
Mo
BG
Bench:
Jasper
Moreno
Jelavic
Chandler/Kam
Aberdeen
Oweh
Noah
Mo
BG
Bench:
Jasper
Moreno
Jelavic
Chandler/Kam
Who knows? I hope we get good news today on that front.U think lowe is out for some time?
I tend you to agree with you. I was expecting more, but it is difficult to really judge much in what appeared to be a half-speed, half-hearted scrimmage. Clearly, we will be a fine team, but I am not absolutely certain we will be better than last year's team ... when it was 100% healthy. I certainly hope so ...I was expecting to be a bit more happy with the tean as a whole, but im hoping its just jitter combined with scrimmage setting...
I don't see it either but beating a #1 is always nice.Can someone explain Purdues lofty preseason ranking? I don’t see it.
Sweet 16 team that brings back 4 starters including projected top PG in NCAA. Three of them will be seniors, and you have three rising sophomores whose roles and production should increase. Added some nice pieces, two veteran transfers who've produced at lower level who will only need to be called on as supporting pieces, and added a nice international guard. Are they truly number 1? Dunno, but that's what people are looking at.Can someone explain Purdues lofty preseason ranking? I don’t see it.
Thanks.Sweet 16 team that brings back 4 starters including projected top PG in NCAA. Three of them will be seniors, and you have three rising sophomores whose roles and production should increase. Added some nice pieces, two veteran transfers who've produced at lower level who will only need to be called on as supporting pieces, and added a nice international guard. Are they truly number 1? Dunno, but that's what people are looking at.
So you don't think they have any value? Its rare to have this high level of an exhibition game so determining its predictive value is hard. Im sure there will be plenty to take away from it, regardless of your irrelevant annoyance.The fact that people still take anything away from these scrimmages is annoying
Considering 38 of the 40 NCAA champions since the field expanded to 64 have consisted of at least three starters who returned from the prior season, Houston and Purdue would stand out as likely champions. The remaining two champs of those 40? They returned two starters each: 2012 Kentucky and 2015 Duke. Roster continuity matters. That’s why Purdue could be destined, but all rules are made to be broken eventually.Can someone explain Purdues lofty preseason ranking? I don’t see it.
I was referring to the blue/white game. The Purdue game will be different. But still not relevantSo you don't think they have any value? Its rare to have this high level of an exhibition game so determining its predictive value is hard. Im sure there will be plenty to take away from it, regardless of your irrelevant annoyance.
So yes this basic means #9 is not going to happen this incoming season because we are return one starter?Considering 38 of the 40 NCAA champions since the field expanded to 64 have consisted of at least three starters who returned from the prior season, Houston and Purdue would stand out as likely champions. The remaining two champs of those 40? They returned two starters each: 2012 Kentucky and 2015 Duke. Roster continuity matters. That’s why Purdue could be destined, but all rules are made to be broken eventually.
Statistically, you are correct, but nothing is impossible with talent, good coaching and a bit of luck. GO CATS !!!So yes this basic means #9 is not going to happen this incoming season because we are return one starter?
It isn’t necessarily whether we return starters but whether our starters are returnees. If we have Oweh and Garrison starting along with Noah or Chandler, we would meet the criteria. Only problem is those aren’t our best players from what I can tell. I don’t think it’s likely we win a title this year based on the data. I’d love to make a final four and be very good, but return much our core and be dominant next year.So yes this basic means #9 is not going to happen this incoming season because we are return one starter?
They will definitely be really good. However, they’ll get bounced by a superior athletic team, like always. They don’t have the athletic ability to win 6 straight NCAA tournament games IMHO.Can someone explain Purdues lofty preseason ranking? I don’t see it.
That may be true. However, the transfer portal has completely changed the game. Those stats are basically null and void now. JMO.Considering 38 of the 40 NCAA champions since the field expanded to 64 have consisted of at least three starters who returned from the prior season, Houston and Purdue would stand out as likely champions. The remaining two champs of those 40? They returned two starters each: 2012 Kentucky and 2015 Duke. Roster continuity matters. That’s why Purdue could be destined, but all rules are made to be broken eventually.
Plus they have size to match our size. They are legit.Sweet 16 team that brings back 4 starters including projected top PG in NCAA. Three of them will be seniors, and you have three rising sophomores whose roles and production should increase. Added some nice pieces, two veteran transfers who've produced at lower level who will only need to be called on as supporting pieces, and added a nice international guard. Are they truly number 1? Dunno, but that's what people are looking at.
Yes, only two 16 seeds upset 1 seeds happens after 2015It isn’t necessarily whether we return starters but whether our starters are returnees. If we have Oweh and Garrison starting along with Noah or Chandler, we would meet the criteria. Only problem is those aren’t our best players from what I can tell. I don’t think it’s likely we win a title this year based on the data. I’d love to make a final four and be very good, but return much our core and be dominant next year.
That said, it’s all math and that’s all it is. No 16 had beaten a one in the NCAAT until a few years ago and now it has happened twice.
TLDR - It’s very unlikely for us to end the season as champs based on the historical data, but I’d love to be wrong.
I feel like last years team was way ahead of this years team at this point. But hopefully this team has a higher ceiling.I tend you to agree with you. I was expecting more, but it is difficult to really judge much in what appeared to be a half-speed, half-hearted scrimmage. Clearly, we will be a fine team, but I am not absolutely certain we will be better than last year's team ... when it was 100% healthy. I certainly hope so ...
If Lowe dislocated his shoulder and it's the first time he's had it dislocated, then I think 4- 6 weeks might be a typical timetable. I'm frustrated just typing this.U think lowe is out for some time?
You should, they have TKR who will probably be an All-American, the best PG in college who could be NPOY, got Cluff in the portal to solidify their frontline, a four year starting shooter in Loyer. They got a highly regarded guard from Europe in Mayer.Can someone explain Purdues lofty preseason ranking? I don’t see it.
Collins was awful last night. Worst game Collins has ever played.Collins couldn't hit the broadside of a barn last night, like the shots were not even close to going in. Let the Mountain Mamba fire at will !!
Starting 5 (if Lowe is good to go)
Lowe
Oweh
Noah
Mo
Garrison
Since Lowe is hurt do you put Aberdeen at pg?Collins was awful last night. Worst game Collins has ever played.
How would this team fare against last year’s team ???Aberdeen
Oweh
Noah
MoD
BG
The same goes with the scrimmage against Purdue. The absolute horror this board will be if UK loses.... Its a SCRIMMAGE folks, relax enjoy the season... But I know I am talking to air.The fact that people still take anything away from these scrimmages is annoying
Should be fun seeing how well we contain Smith.
That's the best lineup at this point and we have horsepower coming off the bench imo.Starting line up against Purdue, take it to bank.
Aberdeen,
Oweh
Kam
Mo
BG
JJ will see a lot of time at PG off the bench.
Way too much depth on this team when all are healthy and this team should be much better defensively, imo.How would this team fare against last year’s team ???
Should be fun seeing how well we contain Smith.
Jamal Collins sucks.Collins was awful last night. Worst game Collins has ever played.