It was a "Unique Seeding Methodology" ...Slightly more complex than the NET Brilliant.
S Shatterthesky22 All-Conference Dec 8, 2018 1,802 1,571 0 Mar 18, 2019 #41 Voldukie said: It was a "Unique Seeding Methodology" ...Slightly more complex than the NET Click to expand... Brilliant.
Voldukie said: It was a "Unique Seeding Methodology" ...Slightly more complex than the NET Click to expand... Brilliant.
J JC CATS Heisman Jun 18, 2009 23,517 12,221 0 Mar 19, 2019 #42 DukefanKY said: That's a level of desperation and stupid that only that fanbase could come up with!! Click to expand... Did you read the comments? 0 people agreed with that stupidity
DukefanKY said: That's a level of desperation and stupid that only that fanbase could come up with!! Click to expand... Did you read the comments? 0 people agreed with that stupidity
J JC CATS Heisman Jun 18, 2009 23,517 12,221 0 Mar 19, 2019 #43 christophero said: Somebody replied with "good thing they didn't use the chain nets." Good one. Click to expand... Yeah, nobody took the guy serious... Reactions: christophero
christophero said: Somebody replied with "good thing they didn't use the chain nets." Good one. Click to expand... Yeah, nobody took the guy serious...
D dukephysics All-Conference Jul 27, 2016 1,109 1,365 0 Mar 19, 2019 #44 JC CATS said: Yeah, nobody took the guy serious... Click to expand... I think that guy was intentionally over the top and not actually serious. The guy last year, though, claiming the refs intentionally called fouls against KState so Kentucky would lose. I think he was serious - and he had *some* support. Reactions: JC CATS
JC CATS said: Yeah, nobody took the guy serious... Click to expand... I think that guy was intentionally over the top and not actually serious. The guy last year, though, claiming the refs intentionally called fouls against KState so Kentucky would lose. I think he was serious - and he had *some* support.