I am life long fan of college football. I understand a lot of the game well. I played up until JV and then focused on other sports. But I certainly don't know how the dynamics of the on field coaches goes at high level football since that is all closed off.
So here is my question. Our offensive line was not and has not been good. Simple as that. Yes, I know there are TEs and RBs also responsible for blocking blah blah blah. But the OL has still been the weakest unit on the team under Beamer.
Teasley was the coach during the worst part of SC's offensive line struggles. The line wasn't great under Adkins but it really struggled under Teasley. So that unit (OL) was his unit so to speak. But Beamer also brought back Shawn Elliott to be the TE Coach and the "run game coordinator." This is where it gets a little confusing to me. I think Elliott is a good coach. Could I be wrong? Certainly. But from what I have heard. SC had a pretty good offensive line when he coached O line under Spurrier. It certainly wasn't as bad as Teasley's offensive line. But even if you don't agree with the idea that Shawn Elliott was a good coach let's just play along for this argument and assume that he would be the best offensive line coach in the SEC if he was coaching it.
Because he was NOT the offensive line coach and, instead as the TE coach and "run game coordinator" would he be far enough away from the offensive line on daily practices and teaching that it could dramatically impact the performance of the OL? In my mind, because he is the "run game coordinator" it seems like he would be heavily involved in coaching the OL. But that is why I am asking the question. I don't know.
It does seem after Teasley was fired, the OL did improve a little even if it was nothing more than being able to snap the ball without getting a penalty.
So here is my question. Our offensive line was not and has not been good. Simple as that. Yes, I know there are TEs and RBs also responsible for blocking blah blah blah. But the OL has still been the weakest unit on the team under Beamer.
Teasley was the coach during the worst part of SC's offensive line struggles. The line wasn't great under Adkins but it really struggled under Teasley. So that unit (OL) was his unit so to speak. But Beamer also brought back Shawn Elliott to be the TE Coach and the "run game coordinator." This is where it gets a little confusing to me. I think Elliott is a good coach. Could I be wrong? Certainly. But from what I have heard. SC had a pretty good offensive line when he coached O line under Spurrier. It certainly wasn't as bad as Teasley's offensive line. But even if you don't agree with the idea that Shawn Elliott was a good coach let's just play along for this argument and assume that he would be the best offensive line coach in the SEC if he was coaching it.
Because he was NOT the offensive line coach and, instead as the TE coach and "run game coordinator" would he be far enough away from the offensive line on daily practices and teaching that it could dramatically impact the performance of the OL? In my mind, because he is the "run game coordinator" it seems like he would be heavily involved in coaching the OL. But that is why I am asking the question. I don't know.
It does seem after Teasley was fired, the OL did improve a little even if it was nothing more than being able to snap the ball without getting a penalty.