RBG
- Thread starter TarHeelEer
- Start date
This thread is embarrassing. A bunch of old men ghoulishly hoping a woman will die for the faintest glimmer of hope that their government can tell women that they don’t know what to do with their bodies. I feel sorry for your wives. If only you’d expended this amount of energy trying to locate their clitoris.
So wrong. I want her to be dead for the sheer entertainment of another SCOTUS nomination hearing.
And now that I am clear about why I want her to die I dont even give a single fux what you think of it.
Well glad you cleared that up then. Wouldn’t want anybody to think you actually thought you had a moral ground you were standing on.
Its cute that you need to feel better about your moral high ground while you support the murder of helpless unborn babies.
So we are back on the “helpless unborn babies” train? Give me a warning next time, you’re giving me whiplash.
Good luck in your endeavors of repealing Roe V Wade, my dude. Hopefully all of you women’s reproductive experts learn a thing or two along the way.
It doesn't take an expert to know that if you don't want to get pregnant use protection or keep your legs closed.
I don’t think anybody would ever confuse you with an expert on a woman’s anatomy, Bubble Bobble.
If you say so. At least I'm not OK will murdering human beings for convenience. Now as far as RBG, I hope she recovers and has a long and healthy retirement.
If it's a struggle over what a woman is to do with her own body, why does the body of an innocent full term pre-born or newborn baby have to be killed in order to demonstrate that?
Last edited:
It was unread on my front page about halfway down. I have twitbot82 on ignore though. There are probably posts from when we were in the Big East on Page 3.
Hahahahahahaha. That’s rich! Coming from the guy who revives threads that are several months old when there is no gotcha.
WVU82's post prior was 10 hours 26 minutes old. I've seen posts revived that were months to years old, including from you. Just trying to Paul Harvey the situation.
Thread revivals are like forensic DNA evidence for non denial denials of previous posts from "selective memory" boasters & posters.
I guess we disagree on this. They are for boasting, and they are revived by people who have far too much time and care far too much about who says what on a board that most hang around for entertainment. That's my opinion anyway. I'll add that they are a damned nuisance as well. They fill up the front page with a bunch of gotcha or nanny-nanny-boo-boo junk that I have no interest in reading. It's not like someone couldn't just copy out the excerpt they wanted to call out, then post that in a new or existing thread to the same effect. Again, just my opinion.
I think it's rip-roarin' entertainment. One can always avoid reading them if they are that disturbing.
I wouldn't say they are disturbing, just not good reading IMHO. To each his own, but I already skip those if I notice the thread started months to years ago.
I read them if they interest me, or there's something new added that brings light to what was already posted... if not I'm like you and just move on to something else.
Not as much boasting as it is showing that other parties were completely wrong. KKKwrong still hasn't got the hang of that.
Nah, it usually takes about a minute to search for the thread I'm looking for.
You do realize that justice Bader said Roe v Wade was wrongly decided. It was a states issue
It has to be a states rights issues. Everyone is entitled to their own opinions but IMO ending a life of a child before it has a chance simply for reasons of birth control is a huge violation of human rights. Its not as if it is difficult to avoid pregnancy if someone doesn't want it. That's my opinion.