RBG..

[roadtrasheer]

Is getting sick again ....i respect her as a person & dont want her to die , but she needs to find a rocking chair.

 

[DvlDog4WVU]

Is getting sick again ....i respect her as a person & dont want her to die , but she needs to find a rocking chair.

Ok, don’t take this the wrong way. I respect the hell out of RBG, and I don’t want to see her croak.

However, that being said, if she did, I’d be so excited to watch the left melt down when Trump gets to pick her replacement. I wonder how many references to Merrick Garland we’d hear. It would legit likely turn into an open assault on Washington by the left. Couldn’t happen at a better time than an election year either. Shewwwww.

 

[op2]

Yes but that is only going to make it that much worse for the Right when the tables are turned, which they eventually will be because they always are.

A Democrat POTUS nominated Merrick Garland but a Republican Senate kept him out because there was a POTUS election about a year away. So what do you think is going to happen the next time a Republican POTUS nominates someone for the SCOTUS with a POTUS election about a year away and the Dems happen to have control of the Senate at the time?

There is no long term gain for either side in that tactic but it degrades politics even more than it already is.

 

[dave]

Yes but that is only going to make it that much worse for the Right when the tables are turned, which they eventually will be because they always are.

A Democrat POTUS nominated Merrick Garland but a Republican Senate kept him out because there was a POTUS election about a year away. So what do you think is going to happen the next time a Republican POTUS nominates someone for the SCOTUS with a POTUS election about a year away and the Dems happen to have control of the Senate at the time?

There is no long term gain for either side in that tactic but it degrades politics even more than it already is.

If you have control of the senate you have the power to push through what you want.

 

[atlkvb]

Yes but that is only going to make it that much worse for the Right when the tables are turned, which they eventually will be because they always are.

A Democrat POTUS nominated Merrick Garland but a Republican Senate kept him out because there was a POTUS election about a year away. So what do you think is going to happen the next time a Republican POTUS nominates someone for the SCOTUS with a POTUS election about a year away and the Dems happen to have control of the Senate at the time?

There is no long term gain for either side in that tactic but it degrades politics even more than it already is.

What makes you think Democrats will ever hold a majority again after this collusion, stormy, extortion, fake impeachment fiasco?

I doubt they can get elected Dog catcher once this farce is over.

 

[Airport]

Yes but that is only going to make it that much worse for the Right when the tables are turned, which they eventually will be because they always are.

A Democrat POTUS nominated Merrick Garland but a Republican Senate kept him out because there was a POTUS election about a year away. So what do you think is going to happen the next time a Republican POTUS nominates someone for the SCOTUS with a POTUS election about a year away and the Dems happen to have control of the Senate at the time?

There is no long term gain for either side in that tactic but it degrades politics even more than it already is.

McConnell will say that because of the disengenous crap that the dem senators pulled, we aren't going to wait till after the next election. Good is all I would say.

 

[Airport]

Is getting sick again ....i respect her as a person & dont want her to die , but she needs to find a rocking chair.

They will rool her into chambers even if she's on life support.

 

[op2]

What makes you think Democrats will ever hold a majority again after this collusion, stormy, extortion, fake impeachment fiasco?

I doubt they can get elected Dog catcher once this farce is over.

I didn't say it will be in the next election. I don't know when it will be. But I know it will happen. And so does everybody else, although some pretend otherwise.

 

[moe]

Yes but that is only going to make it that much worse for the Right when the tables are turned, which they eventually will be because they always are.

A Democrat POTUS nominated Merrick Garland but a Republican Senate kept him out because there was a POTUS election about a year away. So what do you think is going to happen the next time a Republican POTUS nominates someone for the SCOTUS with a POTUS election about a year away and the Dems happen to have control of the Senate at the time?

There is no long term gain for either side in that tactic but it degrades politics even more than it already is.

Could be a clean sweep in a year.

 

[atlkvb]

I didn't say it will be in the next election. I don't know when it will be. But I know it will happen. And so does everybody else, although some pretend otherwise.

I think the Democrat party as it exists today is finished. It will turn into something else, or split into various factions even more radical than today's kook fringe wackos.

 

[Gunny46]

 

[Gunny46]

Ok, don’t take this the wrong way. I respect the hell out of RBG, and I don’t want to see her croak.

However, that being said, if she did, I’d be so excited to watch the left melt down when Trump gets to pick her replacement. I wonder how many references to Merrick Garland we’d hear. It would legit likely turn into an open assault on Washington by the left. Couldn’t happen at a better time than an election year either. Shewwwww.

She's 86. Replacing a women with another women sounds fair right ?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sc...ential-nominee-profile-amy-coney-barrett/amp/
Potential nominee profile: Amy Coney Barrett

 

[Shirley Knott]

What makes you think Democrats will ever hold a majority again after this collusion, stormy, extortion, fake impeachment fiasco?

I doubt they can get elected Dog catcher once this farce is over.

I wouldn't want them chasing my dog......Couldn't catch him in 3 years so opened impeachment inquiry on him.....poor puppy.

 

[DvlDog4WVU]

She's 86. Replacing a women with another women sounds fair right ?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sc...ential-nominee-profile-amy-coney-barrett/amp/
Potential nominee profile: Amy Coney Barrett

The lunacy that would occur over ACB, bye bye independent centrist women, DNC.

 

[Airport]

He should have been on there instead of the wise latina fat ***.

 

[Gunny46]

He should have been on there instead of the wise latina fat ***.

65 with type 1 diabetes. 2nd term ?

 

[Keyser76]

Lol, fill every Supreme court judge seat with a trump pick, how long that gonna prevent the future? ya'll gots big problems going forward. And none of them good ol boys gonna actually have to worry bout trump and his rubes once they on the bench, ya'll crack me up.

 

[Gunny46]

Lol, fill every Supreme court judge seat with a trump pick, how long that gonna prevent the future? ya'll gots big problems going forward. And none of them good ol boys gonna actually have to worry bout trump and his rubes once they on the bench, ya'll crack me up.

Drunk Keyser's greatest hits volume 2.

 

[30CAT]

Drunk Keyser's greatest hits volume 2.

That is freaking hilarious! Especially when someone says: "What the F$%^ are you doing? The limbo?" [laughing]

 

[atlkvb]

Lol, fill every Supreme court judge seat with a trump pick, how long that gonna prevent the future? ya'll gots big problems going forward. And none of them good ol boys gonna actually have to worry bout trump and his rubes once they on the bench, ya'll crack me up.

Hey Keyser heard from someone who cleans the White House lavatories that Trump blows up the place when he takes a dump in one of the sh*tters. Maybe Dems can impeach him for leaving really stinky dumps for the WH latrene crew to clean up?

"Rank climate change for the WH header" [eyeroll]