Record Prediction Thread

ctt8410

All-Conference
Dec 4, 2003
6,845
3,872
0
This is a big year for Frank Haith. After consecutive years with no postseason, the 9-man senior class of 2016 is no longer a valid excuse. He's got a senior point guard that he recruited out of high school, a senior big that fills up the box score, and a host of complementary pieces that he selected. This is now unquestionably Frank Haith's team.



So where do we find improvement for a team that graduated their leading scorer, leading rebounder, and leading 3-point shooter? The first step is a full healthy season from DaQuan Jeffries. On a per-minute basis Jeffries was the best player on the team last year, but he played just 549 minutes out of a possible 1255 last year. And his replacements were... not great. By most metrics, Tulsa would have won an additional 2 games last year if DaQuan Jeffries had played the same number of minutes as Junior Etou.

The next area is, perhaps paradoxically, the outside shooting. Henderson was a great 3-point shooter, but he was a volume shooter. I've got 5 guys on this team projected to shoot better than Henderson's 37.2% mark. Individually none of them will match Henderson's 196 attempts, but collectively they will and I think they'll make more. College basketball has increasingly become a shooter's game in the past few years and, despite never finishing better than 178th in 3PT%, Tulsa has consistently finished in the top half of the NCAA in 3-point attempts under Haith.



The final piece of the puzzle is depth. We know by now that Haith is going to play 10 guys, whether or not some of those guys actually earn minutes. This one requires a leap of faith on the newcomers. Simon Falokun already looks like an impact player. Jeriah Horne will be one. Moore? Barnes? Hewitt? Those guys need to step up.

So what's the record prediction?



One way to solve your early season issues is to just show up to play in the first game of the season. The other way is to schedule some of the worst teams that division 1 has to offer. The first 4 games are true cupcakes. Worse than Jacksonville State. Worse than Lamar. Truly bad teams. The first true test is November 22nd. Nevada has struggled in exhibitions and this will be their first game outside of Reno. They're also the #1 projected offense in the country according to KenPom. But the real key to the nonconference schedule and the ability to build a resume is the 3-game stretch in early December. Utah and KState are winnable games and likely tier 1 opponents. Oklahoma State is likely tier 2. If we want to make the case for an at-large in March, we could really use 2 of those 3 in December. Otherwise, it's an uphill battle. 23 wins with this schedule is probably on the wrong side of the bubble without some marquee wins.
 
  • Like
Reactions: quincy101

nevadanatural

All-American
Dec 3, 2003
13,337
7,770
113
It looks like, from your minutes projection, you anticipate a starting lineup of Taplin, Scott, Horne, Jeffries, and Igbanu. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Moore replace Scott or Horne in that lineup as with his shooting and height he could fill either spot. No matter which of those six start it should be a competitive lineup with the best on our schedule.

If I was going to pick the wins from least likely to sure thing Nevada would be at the top. I hope we can pull off the upset because, with a decent conference campaign, it might be a difference maker come selection Sunday. Ok, record predictions, I’ll take a win over Utah or K-State and predict 11-2 OOC. I think we beat Houston at home and Temple away, 13-5 conference for an overall 24-7 (26-8 after tourney games) and at large bid. I may be overly confident and way off but I don’t see the conference slate being as intimidating as last year. I’m looking forward to seeing how we compete against UNR on the 22nd but not enough to risk a victorious Nevada crowd so this will be the first Vegas tourney I’ll be watching from my living room.
 

Tulsa_

Senior
Dec 4, 2003
2,329
853
113
I would take 23 + 2 AAC tourney wins...

Means we are top 3-4 in the league. Not 9th.
 

Barlass

Senior
Mar 1, 2004
2,861
635
0
I'm a little worried about that Cal Baptist game at noon on a Friday. That team won a ton of games at the D2 level last year.
 

Weatherdemon

All-American
Staff member
Sep 11, 2001
22,074
6,734
113
23-11 seems reasonable.
I expect a couple upsets in the those predicted losses and hope we avoid any of our own.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ctt8410

lawpoke87

Heisman
Dec 17, 2002
166,364
20,402
82
The roster and schedule set up nicely for a great season and possibly a tourney run. Our two best players are Seniors. One of which is a PG. D1 experience at all positions. I’m with Nevada as far as predictions.
 

cmullinsTU

All-American
Dec 19, 2006
10,137
8,196
78
I’m with @TulsaFan01, we are going UNDEFEATED!!!

But end up with 4 blue bloods as 1 seeds, so we end up a 2 seed, Haith loses in the 2nd round. Aston demands we fire Haith.
 

quincy101

All-Conference
Nov 3, 2007
1,961
1,210
113
I'm looking forward to beating Houston twice, tourney too.(sorry CTT). Zane Gray,Jr. is gone, isn't he?
 

I.I.

Heisman
Dec 4, 2003
20,963
16,015
113
Two concerns.....3 point shooting and rebounding. Both were suspect in exhibition. We need a huge development from a player we didn't expect.

Haith doesn't usually start the best 5 players...never has.. We have had some odd starters (Brown against South Carolina may have been the worst example)

I'm just hoping for no rampant substitution until up by 20. Really like Simon. Scott is going to be a lot better. No bad losses is my goal.